Math model reveals insight into how first life forms were 'born'

Mar 11, 2013

An international team of physicists have revealed insights into how the very first life-forms made the jump from the non-living to the living world, by mathematically modelling biological states using energy waves called solitons.

"The model is alive: it oscillates when there isn't enough energy or matter, just like it's breathing. When matter and energy stops flowing through the system, it dies," explains Professor Nail Akhmediev from The Australian National University.

"If these processes happen in simple formations like solitons, we can imagine how the very first basic forms of life were 'born' in nature from non-living elements, such as hydrogen and oxygen."

Professor Akhmediev collaborated with Professor Helmut Brand of the in Germany and Professor Jose Soto-Crespo of the Instituto de Optica in Spain to develop the mathematical model, published in the latest edition of Physics Letters A.

Professor Akhmediev says the soliton model can help us understand basic .

"A soliton – which is a solitary energy wave that doesn't change shape over time – can be used as a model for life because it displays the simplest and most essential functions of life," he says.

"We can apply this model to such as the transport of nerve and muscle pulses, the processes that occur in , and similar phenomena. Having a better understanding of solitons will in turn help us understand how our bodies work.

"At a fundamental level, we are trying to understand how life may have appeared through very simple . Using this model is a powerful approach that will help in analysing more complex situations."

Explore further: Laser beams shed light on natures extreme events

More information: Research paper: Dissipative solitons with energy and matter flows: Fundamental building blocks for the world of living organisms, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960113001606

Related Stories

Laser beams shed light on natures extreme events

Jun 14, 2012

(Phys.org) -- 'Extreme’ events in nature, such as hurricanes, tsunamis and bushfires, may be more commonplace and predictable than you might think, according to scientists from The Australian National ...

Solitary waves induce waveguide that can split light beams

Mar 15, 2012

Researchers have designed the first theoretical model that describes the occurrence of multiple solitary optical waves, referred to as dark photovoltaic spatial solitons. The findings by Yuhong Zhang, a physicist from the ...

Making monster waves

Oct 19, 2009

Rogue waves -- giant waves that spring up suddenly and tower over the seas around them—have inspired physicists to look for an analogue in light. These high-intensity pulses can cross large distances without ...

Rogue wave recreated in laboratory tank

May 24, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- A team of researchers have used a mathematical equation to create a so called "rogue" wave; the giant kind that appear out of nowhere in the open ocean to topple ships and drown their crews. ...

Recommended for you

Engineers pioneer flat spray-on optical lens

21 hours ago

A University of British Columbia engineer and a team of U.S. researchers have made a breakthrough utilizing spray-on technology that could revolutionize the way optical lenses are made and used.

How do cold ions slide

May 23, 2013

Things not always run smoothly. It may happen, actually, that when an object slides on another, the advancement may occur through a 'stop and go' series in the characteristic manner which scientists call ...

User comments : 19

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

dogbert
2.1 / 5 (14) Mar 11, 2013
... we can imagine how the very first basic forms of life were 'born' in nature from non-living elements ...


We can imagine many things, even magic, and we can model our imaginings with computer programs. Playing games with computers does not mean we have any better idea about whatever we are imagining.
jdw
1.5 / 5 (8) Mar 11, 2013
"...we can imagine..."

And until we can create (or re-create), then that's all we can do, really. Do it already!

Let's see something alive happening afresh, without our already-alive contamination involved. That's all we need to see. Something alive, and I'd settle for something not even contained within a membrane. I'm not asking for a lot. A spark of 'life', even if it can't reproduce, would be more than we've managed to do to date.

Seriously, what's taking us so long, I wonder ?
Fabio P_
4.6 / 5 (11) Mar 11, 2013
@jdw: You're not making much sense. In order for the phenomenon to be observable, it needs to occur within controlled conditions, mostly because life is already established in nature and that would make the formation of a different organic chemistry ex-novo in the wild essentially impossible. As such, there will always be some degree of contamination. If you can settle for that - and I see no reason why you shouldn't - then there's plenty of published research out there on self-assembling and self-replicating molecules - organic or otherwise. This is just a modelling approach, and modelling is just as useful as observations most of the time. Try to think before you type anything next time.
dogbert
1.5 / 5 (8) Mar 11, 2013
... modelling is just as useful as observations most of the time.


Not at all. It is possible to model phenomena which do not and/or cannot exist.
Birger
5 / 5 (2) Mar 11, 2013
These are by definition very complex things, and modeling them in silico requires simplifying them to some degree.
Doing "the real thing" first requires avoiding contamination -a very big problem- and then running the experiment long enough for interesting things to happen. Finally, you must examine the outcome of the experiment without contaminating the sample.
I imagine the first attempts will be as frustrating as acheaving "break even" in fusion experiments.
natello
1.5 / 5 (8) Mar 11, 2013
modeling is just as useful as observations most of the time

Richard P. Feynman: "It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong"

Of course, at the moment, when you can make the money only with modeling instead of expensive and tedious experiments, then the mainstream physics parasites will adopt their religion to this situation immediately.
kochevnik
4 / 5 (4) Mar 11, 2013
... modelling is just as useful as observations most of the time.
Not at all. It is possible to model phenomena which do not and/or cannot exist.
Maths address questions of existence, dogbert. Pity you didn't know that
jdw
1 / 5 (8) Mar 11, 2013
In order for the phenomenon to be observable, it needs to occur within controlled conditions, mostly because life is already established in nature and that would make the formation of a different organic chemistry ex-novo in the wild essentially impossible.


That it occurred once is good enough for you, then? Good enough to validate your atheism, I see.

Just.Do.It. If it happened even once, it should be reproducible.

Try to think before you type anything next time.

Horse's neck.
Tausch
3 / 5 (2) Mar 11, 2013
Researchers propose new way to look at the dawn of life.
http://phys.org/n...ife.html

Don't get hung up on definitions or meaning of words.
The new approaches offers a better description to make 'life' more accessible to 'harder' branches of science.

Commendations go out to the researchers. I'm sure Sara Walker has made this ball roll.
natello
1 / 5 (6) Mar 11, 2013
Yep, we are all water surface solitons. Now you can read about it...;-) I had better idea with gamma ray solitons, which pose the physical model of evolution. The gamma ray bursts manage to travel somewhat mysteriously across the whole universe. In my opinion they're formed with swarm of gamma ray photons, which is rolling across cosmic space like the giant vortex ring. If it finds some gamma photons spreading in this path, it can simply swallow it and absorb into itself. The poorly oriented photons and quantum fluctuations of vacuum would decompose these solitons instead. So at the very end whole this cluster of photons is behaving like sparse organism, which collects the "food" from cosmic space and it's losing its "waste". The so-called freak waves in the oceans could be considered as a "living objects" from this perspective too. IMO this model is interesting, but can it really predict something new? I doubt it
natello
1 / 5 (6) Mar 11, 2013
BTW If I would say, we are all wave packets similar to solitons at the water surface, because this is simply the way, in which dense aether analogies work, I would be downvoted for it as a crackpot and accused from spreading of "water surface ducks" with no mercy.

But when the same says "an international team of physicists" who takes a money for it, then it's indeed OK. Despite it this analogy is really very lose, if not naive - the breathing mode of solitons doesn't imply, they're live in no mathematical way. We known about many living organisms, which simply don't breathe or oscillate under all circumstances.

So it's just very loose analogy and frankly it even doesn't explain, how the life was formed at all.
nigel_reading
1.8 / 5 (5) Mar 11, 2013
Asynsis? Life emergence as Solitons: self-organised critical phenomena @ the phase-transition, creative edge of chaos
The simplest soliton? A flame. Chemical oxidation at its most elemental. We are essentially, biochemical fire solitons.
Cosmomimetic Design in Nature, Consciousness & Culture - Asynsis Principle-Constructal Law Seminar: 
Shanghai University-Nantes L'ecole de Design wp.me/p1zCSP-2i via @ASYNSIS
natello
1.7 / 5 (6) Mar 11, 2013
The simplest soliton? A flame
Many chemical system do behave in quite intelligent way even without any oxidation. Try to imagine the way, in which bacteria are seeking for sugar concentration, while avoiding the obstacles. The massive particles do follow density gradient of vacuum (gravity field), while avoiding the places of radiation. They're collecting another massive objects from their environment, while dividing itself occasionally during explosions. The inorganic objects are more similar to primitive organisms, than it's apparent at the first sight.

In AWT we are living in hyperdimensional reality represented with many intersecting density gradients. So when you're walking along streets and deciding what to buy in shops, you're trying to find the most effective path through invisible energetic landscape like bacteria.
baudrunner
2.7 / 5 (3) Mar 11, 2013
The process that encourages the kind of bio-chemical activity that results in living entities should be examined. I theorize that we should look at lichen and similar, perhaps now extinct, life forms that occur around tidal areas. Lichen grow on rock, which contain catalytic elements, and are exposed to the dehydrating influence of sunlight, another catalyst. The tide comes in and covers a primeval "growth" with water, the universal solvent. This repetitive process may cause the formation of a membrane which encapsulates the chemicals in a closed system which subsequently evolve more complex reactions. This results ultimately in unicellular eukaryotic organisms.
Zep Tepi
5 / 5 (1) Mar 11, 2013
"Wave of Translation" ~John Scott Russel
Parsec
5 / 5 (8) Mar 11, 2013

Richard P. Feynman: "It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn't matter how smart you are. If it doesn't agree with experiment, it's wrong" Of course, at the moment, when you can make the money only with modeling instead of expensive and tedious experiments, then the mainstream physics parasites will adopt their religion to this situation immediately.


I for one am sick and tired of idiots like yourself that disparage working scientists because they earn a living wage. Preachers also earn a living wage. Are they religious parasites?

Most scientists could make a heck of a lot more money in finance or high tech than they do in research. That's the simple truth. We are all better off because they choose to do what they do, rather than just take home the big bucks their high IQ could otherwise earn them.
Tausch
not rated yet Mar 11, 2013
Yes. There can be no better transport for information.

And the only difference between the labels 'life' and 'death' is the translation information must perform to uphold the difference.

All humans will like this 'definition'. Until they know more.

Spot on, Zep.
Tausch
not rated yet Mar 11, 2013
Highest commendations go to the researchers.
Dovetailing into my research. Many Thanks.
jsdarkdestruction
5 / 5 (3) Mar 12, 2013
In order for the phenomenon to be observable, it needs to occur within controlled conditions, mostly because life is already established in nature and that would make the formation of a different organic chemistry ex-novo in the wild essentially impossible.


That it occurred once is good enough for you, then? Good enough to validate your atheism, I see.

Just.Do.It. If it happened even once, it should be reproducible.

Try to think before you type anything next time.

Horse's neck.

You are a horses ass, so dont talk.
The origins of life not being some magical creation event and it occuring as the result of natural processes and atheism ARE NOT the same thing. plenty of other religious types that arent young earth creationist accept it.

More news stories

Spheres can form squares

Everybody who has tried to stack oranges in a box knows that a regular packing of spheres in a flat layer naturally leads to a hexagonal pattern, where each sphere is surrounded by six neighbours in a honeycomb-like ...

A quantum simulator for magnetic materials

Physicists understand perfectly well why a fridge magnet sticks to certain metallic surfaces. But there are more exotic forms of magnetism whose properties remain unclear, despite decades of intense research. ...

Engineers pioneer flat spray-on optical lens

A University of British Columbia engineer and a team of U.S. researchers have made a breakthrough utilizing spray-on technology that could revolutionize the way optical lenses are made and used.

The long road to the 2000-watt society

The vision of a society in which each inhabitant of the earth manages to consume only 2000 watts has already been around for 15 years. During this time, there has been a steady increase in environmental awareness ...