Systems biology meets epigenetics: A computational model explains epigenome dynamics during differentiation

Dec 04, 2012
Systems biology meets epigenetics: A computational model explains epigenome dynamics during differentiation

(Phys.org)—Scientists from the Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research and the Biozentrum of the University of Basel have published an important proof-of-principle study showing that a computational model can elucidate the interplay of transcription regulators and epigenome dynamics during differentiation. This is critical for a better understanding of the nature of different cell types and disease stages.

Epigenetics and are two disciplines that created a lot of excitement in the research community in the last decade. It is widely believed that an even bigger potential lies in the combination of both fields, yet experimental and have to join forces. Such collaboration has been successfully shaped in the framework of the systemsX.ch project Cell Plasticity. In the realm of epigenetics and systems biology the groups of Dirk Schübeler at the Friedrich Miescher Institute for (FMI) and of Erik van Nimwegen at the Biozentrum of the University of Basel have accomplished an important proof-of-principle study.

Interplay between chromatin structure and transcription factors

Three years ago, Cell Plasticity set out to elucidate the genome-wide epigenetic and transcriptional events that occur during using a systems biology approach. During differentiation, the process that leads from a to a mature cell, gene expression is adapted continuously. This regulation is coordinated by transcription factors together with dynamic changes in the local organization of chromatin. In the last couple of years, mapping of these chromatin changes such as or on a genome-wide scale has become possible. However, it is still unclear how chromatin modifications are targeted to specific loci in the DNA. What is clear is that the involves mutual feed-back mechanisms between transcription factors and chromatin structure: chromatin structures hinder or allow the binding of transcription factors on the one hand, and transcription factors can recruit proteins to the DNA that alter chromatin structure on the other hand. The interplay between these two mechanisms then determines the resulting gene expression patterns.

It is this process that was the focus of the study of Schübeler and van Nimwegen, which was published recently in Genome Research. Since there are between 1'500 and 2'000 transcription factors, the contribution of each to chromatin structure during differentiation cannot be tested experimentally. The scientists thus aimed to model the relationship between computationally predicted transcription factor binding sites and genome-wide changes in chromatin structure. In more general terms, they wanted to see if their computer model allows them to identify the transcription factors that lead to changes in the chromatin structure relevant for differentiation.

Exemplary collaboration

Indeed, in an exemplary collaboration where the van Nimwegen PhD student Phil Arnold developed the and Anne Schöler, graduate student in Schübeler's team, validated the results experimentally, the scientists identified several sequence motifs that regulate the dynamics of specific chromatin marks during neuronal differentiation, namely the motifs bound by REST and the SNAIL family of .

"These results are important for our systemsX.ch project because they prove that a systems approach to elucidate the genome-wide epigenetic and transcriptional events during differentiation is actually fruitful," comments Schübeler. And van Nimwegen complements that "This work is a perfect example of how a tight integration of computational work with follow-up experiments can lead to insights far beyond what these approaches could have accomplished by themselves."

The same approach is applied to other models of differentiation and disease within the Cell Plasticity network, which is headed by Susan Gasser, director of FMI, and includes colleagues at the FMI, the Biozentrum, the Department of Biomedicine, the University Hospital and Novartis, making Basel a hotspot for systems biological approaches in epigenetics.

Explore further: Team advances genome editing technique

More information: Arnold P, Schöler A, Pachkov M, Balwierz P, Jørgensen H, Stadler MB, van Nimwegen E, Schübeler D (2012) Modeling of epigenome dynamics identifies transcription factors that mediate Polycomb targeting, Genome Res. 2012 Sep

www.cellplasticity.org/
www.systemsx.ch/

Related Stories

The controlled cell

Sep 07, 2012

(Phys.org)—An interdisciplinary effort at the Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research (FMI) addressed the question of how mRNA content, which is translated into proteins, is regulated in the ...

Histone modifications control accessibility of DNA

Jul 14, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- n an advanced online publication in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology scientist from Dirk Schübeler's group from the Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research provide a geno ...

Signaling to chromatin

Jan 03, 2012

(Medical Xpress) -- Scientists from the Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research (FMI) in collaboration with their colleagues from the Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering of the ETH ...

On the move for repair

Apr 17, 2012

Scientists from the Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research have elucidated mechanisms that control DNA movement in the nucleus. They found that DNA with double-strand breaks moves more than undamaged ...

Recommended for you

Team advances genome editing technique

Oct 21, 2014

Customized genome editing – the ability to edit desired DNA sequences to add, delete, activate or suppress specific genes – has major potential for application in medicine, biotechnology, food and agriculture.

Studies steadily advance cellulosic ethanol prospects

Oct 20, 2014

At the Agricultural Research Service's Bioenergy Research Unit in Peoria, Illinois, field work and bench investigations keep ARS scientists on the scientific front lines of converting biomass into cellulosic ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

JVK
1 / 5 (2) Dec 05, 2012
Systems biology met epigenetics two decades ago and the model did not require computation. It required a common sense approach to nutrient chemical-dependent individual survival and pheromone-controlled reproduction.

Human Pheromones: Epigenetic Effects of Odors and Their Affects on Behavior
http://f1000.com/.../1092760

This model of systems biology represents the conservation of bottom-up organization and top-down activation via:
1.Nutrient-dependent stress-induced and social stress-induced intracellular changes in the homeostatic balance of microRNA(miRNA) and messenger RNA (mRNA);
2.Intermolecular changes in DNA (genes);
3.Non-random experience-dependent stochastic variations in de novo gene expression for odor receptors;
4.The required gene-cell-tissue-organ-organ system pathway that links sensory input directly to gene activation in neurosecretory cells of the brain;
5.The required reciprocity that links gene expression to behavior that alters gene expression