Largest global study on violence against women finds feminist movements hold the key to change

Oct 02, 2012

A new study on violence against women conducted over four decades and in 70 countries reveals the mobilization of feminist movements is more important for change than the wealth of nations, left-wing political parties, or the number of women politicians.

The study in the latest issue of (APSR), published by Cambridge University Press for the American Political Science Association (APSA), found that in feminist movements that were autonomous from political parties and the state, were able to articulate and organize around their top priorities as women, without having to answer to broader organizational concerns or men's needs. Mobilizing across countries, feminist movements urged governments to approve global and regional norms and agreements on .

Strong, autonomous feminist movements were the first to articulate the issue of and the key catalysts for government action, with other organisations sidelining issues perceived as being only important to women. Strong movements commanded public support and attention, and convinced the media the issues were important for public discussion. In countries that were slower to adopt policies on violence, feminist movements leveraged global and regional agreements to push for local policy change.

S. Laurel Weldon, co-author of the study, said: "Violence against women is a global problem. Research from North America, Europe, Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, and Asia has found astonishingly high rates of sexual assault, stalking, trafficking, violence in intimate relationships, and other violations of women's bodies and psyches. In Europe it is a bigger danger to women than cancer, with 45 per cent of European women experiencing some form of physical or . Rates are similar in North America, Australia and New Zealand and studies in Asia, Latin America and Africa show that violence towards women there is ubiquitous."

The scope of data for the study is unprecedented. The study includes every region of the world, varying degrees of democracy, rich and poor countries, and a variety of world religions – it encompasses 85 per cent of the world's population. Analysing the data took five years, which is why the most recent year covered is 2005.

Mala Htun, co-author of the study, adds: "Social movements shape public and government agendas and create the political will to address issues. Government action, in turn, sends a signal about national priorities and the meaning of citizenship. The roots of change of progressive social policies lie in civil society."

Explore further: Election surprises tend to erode trust in government

More information: 'The civic origins of progressive policy change: combatting violence against women in a global perspective, 1975-2005' is published in the latest issue of American Political Science Review and is available online at: journals.cambridge.org/psr

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Protests, democracy not always good for women's rights

Mar 25, 2011

Social movements, such as those currently gaining momentum in the Middle East and North Africa, can open the door for democracy, but that does not always benefit women's rights, says a Purdue University sociologist.

Study examines how women label abuse

Dec 12, 2007

U.S. social scientists have found women assaulted by those known to them are less likely to label the experience as abusive violence.

More than 1,100 rapes daily in DRCongo: study

May 11, 2011

More than 1,100 women are raped every day in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), making sexual violence against women 26 times more common than previously thought, a study concluded Wednesday.

How do women fend off domestic violence?

Feb 15, 2011

For many women in violent relationships, leaving is not an option. Yet a woman's arsenal of defenses for resisting violence critically depends on her position within the family and community, according to ...

Recommended for you

Election surprises tend to erode trust in government

18 hours ago

When asked who is going to win an election, people tend to predict their own candidate will come out on top. When that doesn't happen, according to a new study from the University of Georgia, these "surprised losers" often ...

Awarded a Pell Grant? Better double-check

Jul 23, 2014

(AP)—Potentially tens of thousands of students awarded a Pell Grant or other need-based federal aid for the coming school year could find it taken away because of a mistake in filling out the form.

Perthites wanted for study on the Aussie lingo

Jul 23, 2014

We all know that Australians speak English differently from the way it's spoken in the UK or the US, and many of us are aware that Perth people have a slightly different version of the language from, say, Melbournians - but ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

freethinking
1.7 / 5 (6) Oct 02, 2012
Yea the feminists, the ones in the bag so to speak for the Democrats, the same one that protected Bill Clinton, ones that support abortion of female babies, support anti family policies that increase poverty among women and children....

Yea... trust these feminists, they have no agenda other than the Progressive ones.
Emil W
3.7 / 5 (6) Oct 02, 2012
I've just got to ask, "freethinking", what does any of that paranoid, hateful and comically misguided rant have to do with the study of how violence against women may be reduced? I mean, leaving aside that your definition of feminists has no relation to any feminist I've met, it does not appear you have read more than exactly word of the article. Got any thoughts beside "FEMINISTS ARE THE DEVIL BLARG"? Or do you merely wish to discredit this fine scientific work on the grounds that those stupid whores won't go to bed with you?

This is my first comment, and probably last.
gmurphy
3.7 / 5 (3) Oct 03, 2012
@Emil, freethinking is an accomplished troll, he's got some industrial strength 'Glen Beck' category paranoia, he sees Communists, Progressives and Socialists everwhere, pay him no heed.