Protests, democracy not always good for women's rights

Social movements, such as those currently gaining momentum in the Middle East and North Africa, can open the door for democracy, but that does not always benefit women's rights, says a Purdue University sociologist.

"We call this the democracy paradox because history shows that during some postprotest periods, women's can disappear or return to the status quo," says Valentine Moghadam, director of women's studies and a professor of sociology who is an expert in social change and movements in the Middle East and North Africa. "Unless women and women's groups are visible during the negotiations and invited to be part of the new leadership, a nation's new sense of freedom may not be shared by all."

Moghadam, who focuses on issues related to gender, is the author of "Modernizing Women: Gender and Social Change in the Middle East" and "Globalizing Women: Transnational Feminist Networks." She says women's rights experienced a setback when the Communist era ended in Eastern Europe. Before the revolution, women were guaranteed seats in parliament. When the communist governments collapsed, women were not supported as candidates in the new democratic elections, and the proportion of female officials declined from an average of 30 percent to lows of 4 percent.

"This is a fear in Tunisia where women have strong rights, and they are fighting to keep those rights," she says.

Women may lose out in some cases of political transition, but not always, Moghadam says. Women's groups and rights emerged stronger after revolutions in Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Morocco, South Africa and . Today the presidents of Brazil and Argentina are women, and there is a very high representation of Argentine women in the country's parliament. In Morocco, an 11-year campaign by women's rights groups for reform of the country's very discriminatory family law succeeded in 2003, resulting in greater rights for within families.

Moghadam also says that women's issues played a role that led to the chain of events sparking the protests in Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen, Jordan, Iran and Libya. The 2002 Arab Human Development report included gender inequality as among the region's greatest problems.

"In general, people's grievances and frustration have been bubbling for the past decade because of the widening of social inequality, unemployment, persistence of poverty, suppression of any dissent and lack of social and economic justice," she says.

This build-up of frustration is fueling demonstrations and helps explain why protests are erupting in multiple areas, she says.

Explore further

More Is Needed than Quota Laws to Increase the Number of Women Legislators

Provided by Purdue University
Citation: Protests, democracy not always good for women's rights (2011, March 25) retrieved 15 September 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Mar 25, 2011
I see this as a differential equation. Representation in post-protest spots is a function of involvement both before and during the protests; risk your life more, get more kudos later. To make this causal relationship different for groups is discrimination and inequitable.

It would also be a disgrace to all the people who did risk their lives during the protests. Thus, to get the same they must do the same. I encourage the women and women's groups to not just be involved in the negotiations and leadership, but also in the catalysts beforehand.

Get involved in the riots!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more