Physicists set strongest limit on mass of dark matter
Brown University physicists studied seven dwarf galaxies, circled in white (click to enlarge). Observations indicate the dwarf galaxies are full of dark matter because their stars’ motion cannot be fully explained by their mass alone, making them ideal places to search for dark matter annihilation signals. Credit: Koushiappas and Geringer-Sameth, Brown University
Brown University physicists have set the strongest limit for the mass of dark matter, the mysterious particles believed to make up nearly a quarter of the universe. The researchers report in Physical Review Letters that dark matter must have a mass greater than 40 giga-electron volts. The distinction is important because it casts doubt on recent results from underground experiments that have reported detecting dark matter.
If dark matter exists in the universe, scientists now have set the strongest limit to date on its mass.
In a paper to be published on Dec. 1 in Physical Review Letters (available in pdf), Brown University assistant professor Savvas Koushiappas and graduate student Alex Geringer-Sameth report that dark matter must have a mass greater than 40 giga-electron volts in dark-matter collisions involving heavy quarks. (The masses of elementary particles are regularly expressed in terms of electron volts.) Using publicly available data collected from an instrument on NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope and a novel statistical approach, the Brown pair constrained the mass of dark matter particles by calculating the rate at which the particles are thought to cancel each other out in galaxies that orbit the Milky Way galaxy.
"What we find is if a particle's mass is less than 40 GeV, then it cannot be the dark matter particle," Koushiappas said.
The observational measurements are important because they cast doubt on recent results from dark matter collaborations that have reported detecting the elusive particle in underground experiments. Those collaborations DAMA/LIBRA, CoGeNT and CRESST say they found dark matter with masses ranging from 7 to 12 GeV, less than the limit determined by the Brown physicists.
"If for the sake of argument a dark matter particle's mass is less than 40 GeV, it means the amount of dark matter in the universe today would be so much that the universe would not be expanding at the accelerated rate we observe," Koushiappas said, referring to the 2011 Nobel prize in physics that was awarded for the discovery that the expansion of the universe is accelerating.
Independently, the Fermi-LAT collaboration arrived at similar results, using a different methodology. The Brown and Fermi-LAT collaboration papers will be published in the same issue of Physical Review Letters.
Physicists believe everything that can be seen planets, stars, galaxies and all else makes up only 4 percent of the universe. Observations indicate that dark matter accounts for about 23 percent of the universe, while the remaining part is made up of dark energy, the force believed to cause the universe's accelerated expansion. The problem is dark matter and dark energy do not emit electromagnetic radiation like stars and planets; they can be "seen" only through their gravitational effects. Its shadowy profile and its heavy mass are the main reasons why dark matter is suspected to be a weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP), which makes it very difficult to study.
• PhysOrg.com iPhone / iPad Apps
• PhysOrg.com Audio Podcasts / iTunes
• PhysOrg.com Android apps
• PhysOrg.com Blackberry app
• Join PhysOrg.com on Facebook!
• Follow PhysOrg.com on Twitter!
• Join PhysOrg.com on Google+
What physicists do know is that when a WIMP and its anti-particle collide in a process known as annihilation, the debris spewed forth is comprised of heavy quarks and leptons. Physicists also know that when a quark and its anti-quark sibling annihilate, they produce a jet of particles that includes photons, or light.
Koushiappas and Geringer-Sameth in essence reversed the annihilation chain reaction. They set their sights on seven dwarf galaxies which observations show are full of dark matter because their stars' motion cannot be fully explained by their mass alone. These dwarf galaxies also are largely bereft of hydrogen gas and other common matter, meaning they offer a blank canvas to better observe dark matter and its effects. "There's a high signal-to-noise ratio. They're clean systems," Koushiappas said.
The pair analyzed gamma ray data collected over the last three years by the Fermi telescope to measure the number of photons in the dwarf galaxies. From the number of photons, the Brown researchers were able to determine the rate of quark production, which, in turn, allowed them to establish constraints on the mass of dark matter particles and the rate at which they annihilate.
"This is the first time that we can exclude generic WIMP particles that could account for the abundance of dark matter in the universe," Koushiappas said.
Geringer-Sameth developed the statistical framework to analyze the data and then applied it to observations of the dwarf galaxies. "This is a very exciting time in the dark matter search, because many experimental tools are finally catching up to long-standing theories about what dark matter actually is," said Geringer-Sameth, from Croton-on-Hudson, N.Y. "We are starting to really put these theories to the test."
Journal reference:
Physical Review Letters
Provided by
Brown University
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Why does a boiled egg rotates while a raw egg doesn't?
2 hours ago
-
Lightning strike in mindair
2 hours ago
-
Why does light move?
4 hours ago
-
How to calculate the repulsion force between a permanent and an electromagnet?
5 hours ago
-
Why does light allow us to see things?
5 hours ago
-
Room temperature superconductivity
5 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon ...
May 25, 2012 |
4.3 / 5 (22) |
52
|
Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector
Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.
May 23, 2012 |
4 / 5 (7) |
18
|
Hawaii lab turns laser-powered bubbles into microrobots
(Phys.org) -- A team of scientists from the University of Hawaii are working on microrobots created from bubbles of air in a saline solution. The bubbles take on their title of robots as a laser ...
Sound increases the efficiency of boiling
Scientists at the Georgia Institute of Technology achieved a 17-percent increase in boiling efficiency by using an acoustic field to enhance heat transfer. The acoustic field does this by efficiently removing vapor bubbles ...
May 24, 2012 |
5 / 5 (2) |
2
Stunning image of smallest possible five-ringed structure
Scientists have created and imaged the smallest possible five-ringed structure about 100,000 times thinner than a human hair and you'll probably recognise its shape.
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
Nov 23, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (5)
unless......
http://www.presto...ndex.htm
Nov 23, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Nov 23, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
If DM is its own anti-particle, and it produces photons as part of its annihilation chain, then those photons should be clearly visible in the DM auras of colliding galaxies, has this been observed?
Is my logic incorrect?
Nov 23, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
So apparently the Hubbel constant is actually anti-gravity?
Nov 23, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
...If DM is its own anti-particle, and it produces photons as part of its annihilation chain
DM annihilates?
Nov 23, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
I guess equal energy photons could annihilate if they were 180 degrees out of phase.
Nov 23, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
$ units
2412 units, 71 prefixes, 33 nonlinear units
You have: 40 gigaelectronvolt / c^2
You want: protonmass
* 42.631561
Nov 23, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Just choose the right inertial frame of reference, and they'll have the same energy.
Nov 24, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
Not sure how they came up with a baseline for non-DM quark production and hence gamma rays, how did they know what was DM and what was something else?
I just dont think DM is particularly consistant with observations, at least not WIMPS. MACHOS dont seem quite so unlikely, but it still think its both just epicylces (bring on Copernicus 2.0).
Nov 24, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
http://www.presto...ndex.htm
Nov 24, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Nov 24, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (10)
The Cosmic Puzzle attracts Scientists, Amateurs, Philosophers and all mankind in search of divinity of the Human Being.
Debates are going on about awkward state of Cosmology groups
http://vidyardhic...pot.com/
Vidyardhi nanduri -
Nov 24, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
meaning, I guess, that the less mass the more DM?
Nov 24, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
What you may be seeing is large jets of positrons like those emitted from BHs. Positrons, being anti-matter, may very well be repulsive (anti-gravitational).
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
http://www.presto...ndex.htm
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
http://www.aether...ion3.gif
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
http://www.presto...ndex.htm
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
10% of the matter today is regular (like us) while 90% is "dark". In an infinite number of years 0% of matter will be regular while 100% will be dark.
Why infinite? Thermodynamics, it takes infinite space in order to reach absolute zero. The universe will forever be, but it never is as it is now. The universe is everchanging.
Darkmatter is result of decay of matter and a derivative of growing space. As space grows there is more space for matter to release photons into. The more photons matter releases the less energy it has and more it decays (weakening of force). This decay is present and dark.
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (3)
And they know this from what experiment on "dark matter" particles?
For a form of matter that doesn't interact with normal matter electromagnetically, it is pure speculation to assume that its annihilation with its antiparticle will generate EM radiation. It just may as well generate dark energy for all we know, until we can actually unambiguously observe one in an experiment and test it.
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Experimentally when two opposite particles interact they burst into gamma radiation. But light is the electromagnetic force carrier.
What has been shown is that when an electromagnetic particle interacts with its opposite electromagnetic particle (an anti-particle) they annihilate and produce pure energy, light.
Assuming that a darkmatter particle will produce photons when it interacts with an antidarkmatter particle is just sloppy science.
If neither are electromagnetic in nature what electromagnetic force would they employ a photon (the em force carrier) to carry on for them.
Furthermore, darkmatter does not annihilate.
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Darkmatter doesn't have an antiparticle / or in other words / darkmatter is its own antiparticle.
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 25, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
http://www.presto...ndex.htm
Nov 26, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Nov 28, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
I'm sure spacetime suffered serious turbulence during the BB. I think of the BB as blowing smoke rings of spacetime in all directions, eventually leading to galaxies in areas of high energy density.
Nov 28, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
If you want to convince people, use the sequence of implications: Because A then B therefore C. Only such sequence of logics is falsifiable and we could discuss about it. You should always start with acceptable fact in the sequence of such logics.
If you say for example, the "BB are blowing rings of space-time in ALL directions", it has no relation to anything here, including the previous content of your post. It doesn't explain anything, it doesn't predict anything - it's just isolated idea without sense... Why should we bothered with it after then? You will be reported instead as a many other spammers here.
Nov 28, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Nov 28, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Nov 28, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Also a good point about ALL directions. If there are a finite number of galaxies then there must be a finite number of directions.
Nov 28, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Nov 28, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Yes even Einstein thought he made a mistake but he was wrong.
I understand GR predicts singularities in black holes. If my theory was dependent on that result it would be in big trouble.
Nov 28, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Nov 28, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Nov 28, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
They say its energy component is 25% of the energy in the U.
Nov 28, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
According to the article it is 23% of the universe. I am assuming they are talking about 23% of the matter in the universe, not the energy. It just seems that from what I have read we can only detect matter that has an energy component and can only detect energy that has a matter-like or particle component - such as in a photon or a nutrino. Could it simply be that dark matter no longer has an energetic component, therefore it does not react normally and remains undetectable via conventional means. Just as dark energy may not have a partical component and also remains undetectible via conventional means.
If this were the case for both then I'd suppose that black holes could be stripping all of the energy from matter, including particles. Black holes may simply be condensed dark matter.
Nov 28, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
If this were the case then black holes would in fact be radiating (particle-less) dark energy. But I suppose if this were so then the radiating dark energy should be detectible by its effect on other energetic sources passing by the dark energy emitter. Now, if this were the case, then black holes would be more massive than previously measured because the dark energy radiative effect (like a solar wind) would not ave been accounted for.
I imagine that a photon striped of its energy would be dark, just as light stripped of its particle would also be dark.
Nov 29, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
It's obvious by the article above that this is not settled science and a lot of resources are being expended on this learning curve. I posted a few ideas I had not seen brought up before to encourage discussion. As I had posted, I'm not a physicist, but I do have curiosity and I prefer that possibilities be discussed openly.
Dec 05, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Perhaps we should mention light is composed of photons. If a photon was stripped of its energy or light was stripped of its particles (photons) you certainly would have nothing.
Dec 06, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
The superstars preceding the stars of today were far more massive than their successors.
After going supernova and blowing off most of themselves into space to form next generation stellar nurseries, these monster blackholes could still be greater than 1000 solar masses. The upper limit of mass for these earlier generation stars leads back to the originating big bang.
No blackhole within the universe can exceed the mass of the universe.
Dark Matter may be dead stars. Simply put Dark Matter could be all of the dead matter of the universe. Dead stars. Dead atoms.
Dec 07, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Yes could be. Anyway they claim it is the stuff that holds galaxies together. No galaxies, no stars. No stars, no dead stars, no dark matter.
Dec 09, 2011
Rank: not rated yet