Three more reasons for clean energy

Apr 08, 2011 By Phyllis Cuttino,

We've heard again and again that concerns about the environment, public health and national security are reasons to develop policies that encourage clean energy investment - and we've also heard vigorous debate on these issues. But recent data show that three of the biggest - and the most unifying - factors Congress and the Obama administration should consider are right in their sights: jobs, export opportunities and the United States' descent to third place in a race that's critical to our future.

It's true that wind, solar and other non-fossil fuel based can help reduce emissions that impinge on human health and the Earth's climate, while also lowering our dependence on oil from politically unstable regions. Today, however, the new imperative is investment, which generates the innovation, commercialization, manufacturing and installation of technologies.

New research on private finance and investment in the 20 largest industrialized economies shows that 2010 was another year of significant growth and increased competition in the clean energy sector. Among G-20 nations, the , with $34 billion in clean energy investment, continued its steady decline in leadership - falling to third behind China and Germany.

Worldwide, clean energy investments grew by 30 percent to $243 billion in 2010, restoring the rapid pace of growth that characterized the sector prior to the worldwide recession. In the past seven years, clean energy funding has grown by 630 percent, with more than 90 percent invested in G-20 nations.

Countries with strong policies in place have positioned themselves to attract substantial domestic investment in the manufacturing and export of , solar energy systems and energy efficiency technologies-or a combination of these.

Germany, which has long had a stable, ambitious and comprehensive clean , saw investments in the sector grow by 100 percent to $41.2 billion in 2010, a funding level that displaced the United States from second place among the G-20 nations. Last year, China replaced America as the top destination for clean energy investment. In fact, the $54.4 billion invested in China's clean energy sector last year was an all-time record for a single country - equal to all the dollars invested globally in 2004.

The trends are anything but encouraging for the United States. Even though clean energy investment here increased by more than 50 percent in 2010, we are not keeping pace with key G-20 competitors - six other nations saw investments grow at a faster rate last year.

To be sure, the United States remains the undisputed leader in clean energy innovation, thanks to the strength of our venture capital industry and sizeable stimulus funding for research and development. But in too many cases, ideas arise here while applications - and profits - accrue elsewhere.

Our nation's competitive position appears to be at significant risk. On a number of key measures - overall investment, installed capacity, five-year rate of investment growth and investment intensity - the United States has slipped among the G-20. And our unsteadiness is occurring in the context of dynamic expansion of the sector and global competition.

The most successful countries have established policies that set ambitious nationwide targets for key clean energy technologies. Most of the fastest growing markets for are driven by long-term contracts that guarantee renewable energy producers a set price for electricity fed into the grid, but few American municipalities provide such pledges. Meanwhile, Germany, China, India and others are attracting with strong, predictable policy frameworks that also include renewable energy standards, tax credits and access to low-cost loans. In the absence of such policies, each year the United States falls farther behind.

We are at a crossroads. We can continue to watch our manufacturing base erode, or we can put in place the right kind of policies to move capital off the sidelines. With significant growth and opportunity all over the world, the United States can be a promising place to stake a claim on the future - but only if Congress adopts energy policies that create a reasonable climate of stability for investors.

In today's world, strong national clean energy policies in other G-20 countries have helped create jobs, spur manufacturing and grow exports. Now, the United States must take action or risk falling further behind in the global clean energy race.

Explore further: ASU grant aims to transform global energy landscape

More information: Phyllis Cuttino is director of the Pew Environment Group's Clean Energy Program, 901 E Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20004; email: pcuttino(at)pewtrusts.org.

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

China joins U.S. FutureGen project

Dec 16, 2006

China has joined the United States in the FutureGen International Partnership, a plan to develop clean-burning coal, the U.S. Department of Energy said Friday.

'Green' job sector off to good start

Jun 11, 2009

THE CLEAN TECHNOLOGY SECTOR -- where the "green" jobs are found -- is very much in its infancy, but off to a "strong start," according to a first-of-its-kind report released Wednesday.

US, China launch clean energy research initiative

Nov 17, 2010

US Energy Secretary Steven Chu said Wednesday the United States and China had launched a joint clean energy initiative -- one of the largest research collaborations between two countries in the world.

US tops $1 bln in stimulus for clean energy projects

Sep 22, 2009

The US government has spent more than one billion dollars on private sector renewable energy projects from the massive economic stimulus program passed seven months ago, officials said Tuesday.

Recommended for you

Should the Japanese give nuclear power another chance?

6 hours ago

On September 9, 2014, the Japan Times reported an increasing number of suicides coming from the survivors of the March 2011 disaster. In Minami Soma Hospital, which is located 23 km away from the power plant, ...

UK wind power share shows record rise

10 hours ago

The United Kingdom wind power production has been enjoying an upward trajectory, and on Tuesday wind power achieved a significant energy production milestone, reported Brooks Hays for UPI. High winds from Hurricane Gonzalo were the force behind wind turbines outproducing nuclear power ...

Global boom in hydropower expected this decade

14 hours ago

An unprecedented boom in hydropower dam construction is underway, primarily in developing countries and emerging economies. While this is expected to double the global electricity production from hydropower, it could reduce ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Gustav
2.3 / 5 (3) Apr 08, 2011
Phyllis Cuttino is an environmental activist, so she's clearly peddling this stuff for her own gain. But the truth about the so called "clean energy" is that (1) it loses jobs: 2.2 per one gained, or 5.28 per one "green megawatt", (2) it does nothing for out dependence on imported oil, because we do not use oil to produce electricity! (3) it is not even "clean", because a great deal of muck is released into the environment, when you produce windmills and photovoltaics. Furthermore, the footprint of windmill and photovoltaic farms is enormous, because they are so inefficient, and this footprint alone is a massive contaminant, as is the effect of windmills on air-circulation. A massive deployment of windmills throughout the US, for example, would cause way more environmental damage than the present system, because the footprint of present-day power stations is so small. If you want "clean energy", put your own money, not the tax-payers' into it.
Jmaximus
1 / 5 (1) Apr 10, 2011
Phyllis Cuttino is right on the mark. America is heading toward rapid decline and second rate status because of conservative polices. Instead of investing in our country for the future, we opted for crumbling roads and infrastructure, imported energy, tax cuts for the wealthy and an ever increasing military empire all paid for on the backs of the middle class. Yes we do need this, but American multinationals would simply buy all the solar cells and wind turbines from China. The only jobs would be installing and servicing them, unless we impose a VAT tax like Germany and China.