Three more reasons for clean energy

April 8, 2011 By Phyllis Cuttino,

We've heard again and again that concerns about the environment, public health and national security are reasons to develop policies that encourage clean energy investment - and we've also heard vigorous debate on these issues. But recent data show that three of the biggest - and the most unifying - factors Congress and the Obama administration should consider are right in their sights: jobs, export opportunities and the United States' descent to third place in a race that's critical to our future.

It's true that wind, solar and other non-fossil fuel based can help reduce emissions that impinge on human health and the Earth's climate, while also lowering our dependence on oil from politically unstable regions. Today, however, the new imperative is investment, which generates the innovation, commercialization, manufacturing and installation of technologies.

New research on private finance and investment in the 20 largest industrialized economies shows that 2010 was another year of significant growth and increased competition in the clean energy sector. Among G-20 nations, the , with $34 billion in clean energy investment, continued its steady decline in leadership - falling to third behind China and Germany.

Worldwide, clean energy investments grew by 30 percent to $243 billion in 2010, restoring the rapid pace of growth that characterized the sector prior to the worldwide recession. In the past seven years, clean energy funding has grown by 630 percent, with more than 90 percent invested in G-20 nations.

Countries with strong policies in place have positioned themselves to attract substantial domestic investment in the manufacturing and export of , solar energy systems and energy efficiency technologies-or a combination of these.

Germany, which has long had a stable, ambitious and comprehensive clean , saw investments in the sector grow by 100 percent to $41.2 billion in 2010, a funding level that displaced the United States from second place among the G-20 nations. Last year, China replaced America as the top destination for clean energy investment. In fact, the $54.4 billion invested in China's clean energy sector last year was an all-time record for a single country - equal to all the dollars invested globally in 2004.

The trends are anything but encouraging for the United States. Even though clean energy investment here increased by more than 50 percent in 2010, we are not keeping pace with key G-20 competitors - six other nations saw investments grow at a faster rate last year.

To be sure, the United States remains the undisputed leader in clean energy innovation, thanks to the strength of our venture capital industry and sizeable stimulus funding for research and development. But in too many cases, ideas arise here while applications - and profits - accrue elsewhere.

Our nation's competitive position appears to be at significant risk. On a number of key measures - overall investment, installed capacity, five-year rate of investment growth and investment intensity - the United States has slipped among the G-20. And our unsteadiness is occurring in the context of dynamic expansion of the sector and global competition.

The most successful countries have established policies that set ambitious nationwide targets for key clean energy technologies. Most of the fastest growing markets for are driven by long-term contracts that guarantee renewable energy producers a set price for electricity fed into the grid, but few American municipalities provide such pledges. Meanwhile, Germany, China, India and others are attracting with strong, predictable policy frameworks that also include renewable energy standards, tax credits and access to low-cost loans. In the absence of such policies, each year the United States falls farther behind.

We are at a crossroads. We can continue to watch our manufacturing base erode, or we can put in place the right kind of policies to move capital off the sidelines. With significant growth and opportunity all over the world, the United States can be a promising place to stake a claim on the future - but only if Congress adopts energy policies that create a reasonable climate of stability for investors.

In today's world, strong national clean energy policies in other G-20 countries have helped create jobs, spur manufacturing and grow exports. Now, the United States must take action or risk falling further behind in the global clean energy race.

More information: Phyllis Cuttino is director of the Pew Environment Group's Clean Energy Program, 901 E Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20004; email: pcuttino(at)pewtrusts.org.

(c) 2011, Pew Environment Group
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Gustav
Apr 08, 2011

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Phyllis Cuttino is an environmental activist, so she's clearly peddling this stuff for her own gain. But the truth about the so called "clean energy" is that (1) it loses jobs: 2.2 per one gained, or 5.28 per one "green megawatt", (2) it does nothing for out dependence on imported oil, because we do not use oil to produce electricity! (3) it is not even "clean", because a great deal of muck is released into the environment, when you produce windmills and photovoltaics. Furthermore, the footprint of windmill and photovoltaic farms is enormous, because they are so inefficient, and this footprint alone is a massive contaminant, as is the effect of windmills on air-circulation. A massive deployment of windmills throughout the US, for example, would cause way more environmental damage than the present system, because the footprint of present-day power stations is so small. If you want "clean energy", put your own money, not the tax-payers' into it.
Jmaximus
Apr 10, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Phyllis Cuttino is right on the mark. America is heading toward rapid decline and second rate status because of conservative polices. Instead of investing in our country for the future, we opted for crumbling roads and infrastructure, imported energy, tax cuts for the wealthy and an ever increasing military empire all paid for on the backs of the middle class. Yes we do need this, but American multinationals would simply buy all the solar cells and wind turbines from China. The only jobs would be installing and servicing them, unless we impose a VAT tax like Germany and China.
Rank not rated yet
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...

Technology / Hi Tech & Innovation

created 19 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (5) | comments 12 | with audio podcast report

Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study

Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 3.6 / 5 (21) | comments 56 | with audio podcast

Delphi gasoline-injection engine technique rivals hybrid's edge

(Phys.org) -- Running a diesel like engine on gasoline is something Delphi is doing in notable fashion. They claim they are on to a promising way to enjoy an engine that gives the vehicle owner high efficiency ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 21, 2012 | popularity 4.7 / 5 (18) | comments 37 | with audio podcast report

HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world

(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the company’s ultimate vision, successfully producing ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.8 / 5 (15) | comments 17 | with audio podcast report

Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22

Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.5 / 5 (11) | comments 18


Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)

SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.

Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru

Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.

Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit

Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.

Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend

(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.