This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

trusted source

proofread

Seven billion newly hatched chicks are killed every year—but a ban is not the solution, says study

Chicks
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

With Easter just around the corner, we are surrounded by a ubiquity of eggs and adorable yellow chicks that symbolize life and resurrection. In stark contrast is the fact that around seven billion male layer chicks, are shredded or gassed alive by the egg industry every year, just hours after they hatch. Male chicks of course cannot lay eggs, and they are furthermore not worth fattening up like broilers, due to decades of specialized breeding toward either egg laying or meat production—but not both.

Calculations show that it costs one dollar to kill each —an of approximately seven billion dollars, and thus this also constitutes a significant expense for the industry.

"While the ethical aspect of systematically killing so many animals is obvious to many of us, the ways we currently try to solve the problem are also problematic from a wider perspective," says Rebecca Rutt, an associate professor at the Department of Food and Resource Economics who researches industrial animal production.

In the wake of pressure from animal rights organizations, a few countries have now banned chick culling, including Germany, Austria, and France. In Denmark, where the practice remains legal, more than three million day-old male layer chicks are culled every year—including those from free-range and organic production systems. However, according to Rebecca Rutt, the imposition of bans is not a real solution:

"In countries where killing has been made illegal, male chicks are often exported. They end up in places where they are kept alive as cheaply as possible and often under poor conditions, just long enough for them to be legally slaughtered, at which point they are often used to make products like pet food. So from an animal welfare perspective, the bans are no solution," says Rutt, who, together with research colleague Jostein Jakobsen from the University of Oslo, studied the ongoing and emerging alternatives to chick culling coming from the biotech sector.

Patch-up solutions?

Many animal welfare organizations point out that a better solution would be to avoid having male-layer chicks born in the first place. In response, biotech companies in several countries are vying to develop technologies for this purpose, and in some cases, even being publicly subsidized to do so.

The technologies include several methods to determine an embryo's sex so males can be destroyed prior to incubation and hatching—ideally as early as possible. One, at least, is even attempting to alter the sex of chicks through environmental stimuli, utilizing birds' natural genetic plasticity.

"The technological solutions are presented as a multi-win because the industry actors may save money on incubation and human labor costs, there's less energy expended, and, of course, the lives of the newborn chicks are spared. Taken on its own, this seems like a good solution. But at the same time, such 'solutions' also serve to uphold an industry that is riddled with ethical problems for those chickens that live," says Rebecca Rutt.

These include the widespread keel bone fractures in egg-laying hens, pecking and cannibalism among stressed chickens that lack space and sunlight, and/or that are kept in flock sizes too large to allow them to establish a natural hierarchy, not to mention the 'turbo' chickens which fatten so quickly that their organs and legs cannot bear their own body weight.

Chickens that can do both

According to the researcher, resolving dilemmas in the industry and our food system requires that it is approached as a whole:

"Chick culling can be seen as an expression of an industry driven by efficiency logics due to intense competition. Combined with decades of intensified breeding, the system has rendered male 'layers' effectively worthless" says Rutt.

This breeding has roots especially in the 1950s in the United States. Here, chickens began to be aggressively bred so that some would lay as many and as large eggs as possible while others would gain as much weight as possible in the shortest time. This has resulted in hens that currently lay around 300 eggs a year but are not very meaty and broilers that put on two kilos in just 35 days.

"My own and colleagues' research has found that quite a few farmers would like to produce differently, such as at a smaller scale including a slower pace, to allow better living conditions, and perhaps return to the 'heritage' or 'dual purpose' breeds of the past that provided both eggs and eventually meat—though at much smaller quantities. Yet most today wouldn't survive economically."

"So such shifts would require more fundamental changes that must be driven by legislation, which typically follows from public pressure," says Rutt.

She concludes, "Shedding more light on practices like male chick culling, and putting current 'solutions' into the wider perspective, is an important part of informing this process."

The study is published in the journal Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space.

More information: Rebecca Leigh Rutt et al, The 'brother layer problem': Routine killing, biotechnology and the pursuit of 'ethical sustainability' in industrial poultry, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space (2022). DOI: 10.1177/25148486221131195

Citation: Seven billion newly hatched chicks are killed every year—but a ban is not the solution, says study (2024, March 21) retrieved 22 May 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2024-03-billion-newly-hatched-chicks-year.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Israeli technology aims to curb male chick culling

1 shares

Feedback to editors