This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

trusted source

proofread

Minerals and land use determine carbon storage in soils, finds study

Minerals and land use determine carbon storage in soils
Burying sample containers with minerals in the soil. Credit: Ingo Schöning, MPI-BGC

Carbon sequestration in soils can contribute to mitigate climate change, and soil organic matter associated with minerals has the highest capacity to store carbon. A team of researchers, including scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry and the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, assessed the factors controlling mineral-associated organic matter.

Their study, published in Global Change Biology, demonstrates that while the amount and rate of its formation is primarily controlled by the , both and management intensity also affect mineral-associated on short time scales.

Soil organic is not only important for and food production, but also plays an important role in Earth's climate since about 7% of atmospheric CO2 is cycling through soils every year. Since the onset of agriculture, soils have lost significant amounts of carbon to the atmosphere. To mitigate , we therefore need to understand, how additional carbon losses can be prevented and carbon stocks can be restored.

When associated with minerals, soil organic carbon has an increased residence time and resistance to disturbances. The formation of mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) is thus a key process in the . However, despite decades of research, it remained unresolved how mineral composition and land management intensity affect MAOM formation.

To address this research gap, more than 3,500 permeable containers filled with carbon-free goethite, a representative iron oxide in the soil, or illite, a representative silicate clay mineral, were buried at 150 forest and 150 grassland sites. The sites are located in the three German study regions of the infrastructure priority program "Biodiversity Exploratories."

After five years of incubation underground, a team of scientists led by De Shorn Bramble of the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (MPI-BGC) in Jena and Susanne Ulrich of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (MLU), analyzed the container contents. They found that irrespective of land use type and management intensity, goethite accumulated four times more than illite. This result underscores that mineral composition is key in controlling the rate and amount of MAOM formation in soils.

"Much of our knowledge about the role of oxides and silicate clays for soil carbon storage has been derived from laboratory studies. Since these two mineral groups interact in natural soils, straightforward differentiation of their individual roles in MAOM formation is not possible," explains Susanne Ulrich, Ph.D. candidate at MLU.

"Our experimental set-up allowed us to directly compare the carbon storage potential of these two mineral groups under field conditions for the first time. Our results show that not mineral surface area, but surface properties determine MAOM formation, with oxides having a much larger potential to store carbon than silicate clay minerals."

Due to the long residence time of carbon on minerals, MAOM formation was thought to be relatively insensitive to land use and management on time scales less than decades. However, in their study, the researchers observed that MAOM formation in forests was reduced by harvest intensity and modified by tree species selection. In grasslands, plant productivity as well as plant diversity increased MAOM formation. Both, plant productivity and plant diversity were influenced by fertilization, with fertilization increasing plant productivity but reducing .

De Shorn Bramble, Ph.D. candidate at MPI-BGC, illustrates the contrasting new results: "We observed significant land use and management effects on MAOM formation after exposing carbon-free minerals for only five years to ambient soil conditions. These changes are also likely taking place in natural soils but might be difficult to detect with conventional measurement approaches. Our findings and experimental approach might thus be important in predicting how MAOM responds to human activities."

He states that while mineral composition determines the potential for soil carbon storage, land use influences how much of this potential is realized. Therefore, it is important to continue learning how plant productivity, quality of organic input and the decomposer community interact in MAOM formation of soils under different management.

More information: De Shorn E. Bramble et al, Formation of mineral‐associated organic matter in temperate soils is primarily controlled by mineral type and modified by land use and management intensity, Global Change Biology (2023). DOI: 10.1111/gcb.17024

Journal information: Global Change Biology

Provided by Max Planck Society

Citation: Minerals and land use determine carbon storage in soils, finds study (2023, November 28) retrieved 3 March 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2023-11-minerals-carbon-storage-soils.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Researchers discover root exudates have surprising and counterintuitive impact on soil carbon storage

9 shares

Feedback to editors