This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

trusted source

proofread

Flood variability in the upper Yangtze River over the last millennium

Flood variability in the upper Yangtze River over the last millennium -- Insights from a comparison of climate-hydrological mode
In the upper panel graph, the upper bars indicate wet periods and the lower mean dry periods. Heavy orange represents the flood period, and light orange represents the drought period. The values in each subplot represent the percentage of negative anomaly values for each period. Credit: Science China Earth Sciences (2023). DOI: 10.1007/s11430-022-1008-5

A recent study led by Dr. Huo Ran (State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University) integrated reconstructed data and (global climate and hydrological) model simulations to better understand the variability of climate and hydrology over timescales ranging from decades to centuries.

They first drove using the precipitation and temperature from four Global Climate Models (GCM), BCC-CSM1.1, MIROC, MRI-CGCM3, and CCSM4, to simulate daily discharge for the upper reach of the Yangtze River during the period of the last millennium (850–1849), historical period (1850–2005), and a future period (2006–2099).

The team found that:

(i) The MIROC model, differing from the other three GCM models, revealed positive temperature changes from the warm period (Medieval Climate Anomaly; MCA) to the cold period (Little Ice Age; LIA), while the temperature variability of the other models was similar to the records.

(ii) The BCC-CSM1.1 model performed better than the others regarding correlations between modeled precipitation and documented dry-wet periods.

(iii) Over most of the subbasins in the upper Yangtze River, the magnitude of extreme discharge in the BCC-CSM1.1 model results showed that there was a decrease from the MCA to the LIA period and an increase in the historical period relative to the cold period, while a future increase was projected by the four GCMs under the influence of climate change.

The paper is published in the journal Science China Earth Sciences.

More information: Ran Huo et al, Flood variability in the upper Yangtze River over the last millennium—Insights from a comparison of climate-hydrological model simulated and reconstruction, Science China Earth Sciences (2023). DOI: 10.1007/s11430-022-1008-5

Journal information: Science China Earth Sciences

Citation: Flood variability in the upper Yangtze River over the last millennium (2023, April 24) retrieved 18 June 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2023-04-variability-upper-yangtze-river-millennium.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Increasing trends of warm and wet extremes slowed in China during recent global warming hiatus

2 shares

Feedback to editors