Study demonstrates efficiency of deltaic sediments for storing organic carbon for hundreds of thousands of years

Efficiency of deltaic sediments to store organic carbon for hundreds of thousands of years demonstrated
Satellite image of the mouth of the Amazon River in Brazil. Of all the major river deltas on our planet, the Amazon River delta is the one that contributes the largest amount of organic carbon of continental origin to the ocean. But until now, the efficiency of delta sediments in the long-term storage of organic carbon was unknown. Credit: NASA's WorldWind software.

An international research team with participation of the UAB team has succeeded in quantifying the volume of continental organic carbon stored in delta sediments from 75 million years ago. The research, published in Nature Geoscience, demonstrates that deltas are large stores of the planet's carbon and, therefore, important climate regulators over geological time periods.

Terrestrial plants use atmospheric CO₂ and transform it into organic carbon for their growth. Once the plants and the living beings that consume them die, most of the organic carbon is returned to the atmosphere, but a small part is transported by rivers to the ocean, where it is accumulates in . The burial and storage of this organic carbon of continental origin in marine sediments can reduce the Earth's atmospheric CO₂ levels, and thus regulate its climate cycle over geological timescales, which are intervals generally longer than one hundred thousand years.

The largest accumulation site of organic carbon in today's oceans is in deltaic areas, some of which are composed of large accumulations of sediment. Analysis of modern deltaic sediments, however, only provides information on the temporal and spatial characteristics of these complex sedimentary environments for a short period of time in geological terms. This complicates the calculation of their long-term organic carbon burial efficiency.

In the now-published study, researchers have determined the volume of organic carbon stored in a deltaic sedimentary succession accumulated during the Upper Cretaceous, 75 million years ago, in the Magallanes Basin of southern Chile. To calculate carbon burial rates on a geological scale, the researchers reconstructed the dimensions of the delta and quantified the organic content of the rock samples, combining this information with their own dating of the rocks from previous work.

The results show that up to almost 100 megatons of organic carbon of continental origin were stored in these sediments over a time period of approximately 100,000 to 900,000 years, at an annual burial rate of 2–16 tons per km²/year. These values are of a similar order of magnitude to organic burial rates in modern deltas, such as the Amazon River.

"In this study we demonstrate that deltaic areas have been, are and probably will be large natural stores of continental on our planet and, therefore, important climate regulators over geological time periods," says Miquel Poyatos. "Governments and institutions of countries with deltas in their territory have the need to protect, maintain and restore them, especially in the current context of climate change, sea level rise and loss due to reservoirs," concludes the UAB researcher.

More information: Sophie Hage et al, High rates of organic carbon burial in submarine deltas maintained on geological timescales, Nature Geoscience (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s41561-022-01048-4

Journal information: Nature Geoscience

Citation: Study demonstrates efficiency of deltaic sediments for storing organic carbon for hundreds of thousands of years (2022, October 25) retrieved 27 January 2023 from https://phys.org/news/2022-10-efficiency-deltaic-sediments-carbon-hundreds.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

New research could help protect our vulnerable shelf seas

42 shares

Feedback to editors