'Smart' greenhouses could slash electricity costs

‘Smart’ greenhouses could slash electricity costs
Marc Van Iersel among turnip plants in a grow room at his greenhouses. Credit: Andrew Davis Tucker/UGA

A new, internet-connected lighting system for greenhouses could sharply reduce a farmer's electrical bill, according to a study by University of Georgia researchers.

Recently published in Plants, the study showed that a predictive lighting control system could optimize lighting for plants by predicting sunlight and only running the lights when needed. The data showed that farmers could reduce their greenhouse electrical by as much as 33 percent by optimizing their lights.

On rainy or cloudy days, plants are given supplemental lighting to make up for the lack of sunlight. While effective, these lights can be expensive, inefficient and consume huge amounts of electricity. A 2017 report from the U.S. Department of Energy estimated that horticultural lighting consumed $600 million worth of electricity every year.

"When LED lights first came to market, they gave us an opportunity to control greenhouse lighting on a level that was not possible before," said Marc Van Iersel, a professor in the College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences. "At the time, a lot of research was happening to optimize the lights themselves, but almost no one was working on smart control of the lighting system."

"The electricity used for the lights is anywhere from 10 percent to 30 percent of the cost of running a greenhouse," Van Iersel said. "Our research began with the idea that, if we can reduce this cost, we can very quickly have an impact on the efficiency and sustainability of greenhouses."

A team of University of Georgia researchers designed a new that could reduce a greenhouse's electrical demand without hurting the plants.

Electrical engineering master's student Shirin Afazli built a control system that uses sensors to measure current weather conditions, and Ph.D. student Sahand Mosharafian and associate professor Javad Mohammadpour Velni developed -predicting algorithms in their laboratories. In combination, the system can predict the amount of sunlight in the future. This allows it to optimize the lights inside the greenhouse and give the correct amount of light.

Greenhouses are predominantly used during the winter and spring, so the team tested their system during both growing seasons. While both experiments showed reduced costs while maintaining plant growth, the new system made a bigger impact during the spring. It reduced costs by 33 percent in the spring but only 4 percent in the winter. The system generates the most savings while the sun is shining. Because winter months have shorter days, the lights are required to be on more often.

According to the researchers, the actual cost savings could be even higher. Their experiments assumed a fixed cost for electricity, but in the real world, farms are subject to variable pricing. The team has already programed the system to account for this variable and plans to publish future research that shows higher savings rates. As the planet's population continues to rise, finding ways to produce more food with less resources becomes increasingly important.

In 2017, Van Iersel co-founded a , Candidus, based on his research into efficient lighting. The company builds better lighting control systems for greenhouses.


Explore further

Smarter energy use is key to a greener future

More information: Shirin Afzali et al, Development and Implementation of an IoT-Enabled Optimal and Predictive Lighting Control Strategy in Greenhouses, Plants (2021). DOI: 10.3390/plants10122652
Citation: 'Smart' greenhouses could slash electricity costs (2022, February 3) retrieved 12 August 2022 from https://phys.org/news/2022-02-smart-greenhouses-slash-electricity.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
6 shares

Feedback to editors