Early humans evolved in ecosystems unlike any found today

Early humans evolved in ecosystems unlike any found today
Artist Heinrich Harder's illustration of the extinct Deinotherium, an ancient relative to modern-day elephants that appeared in the Middle Miocene 20 million years ago and lived until the Early Pleistocene, around 2 million years ago. Harder completed the illustration in the early 1900s using fossils as his model. Credit: Heinrich Harder

To understand the environmental pressures that shaped human evolution, scientists must first piece together the details of the ancient plant and animal communities that our fossil ancestors lived in over the past 7 million years. Because putting together the puzzle of millions-of-years-old ecosystems is a difficult task, many studies have reconstructed the environments by drawing analogies with present-day African ecosystems, such as the Serengeti. A study led by a University of Utah scientist calls into question such approaches and suggests that the vast majority of human evolution occurred in ecosystems unlike any found today. The paper was published online today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

To test for differences between modern and ancient environments, the researchers analyzed a dataset of more than 200 present-day African mammal communities and more than 100 fossil communities spanning the past 7 million years in eastern Africa, a time period encompassing all of human evolution. They found that prior to 700,000 years ago, mammal communities looked far different from those today. For example, fossil communities supported a greater diversity of megaherbivores, species over 2,000 pounds, such as elephants. Likewise, the dietary structure of fossil communities frequently departed from those seen today, with patterns of grass- and leaf-eating species fluctuating in abundance. Around 1 million years ago, fossil communities began transitioning to a more modern makeup, which the authors suggest is the likely the outcome of long-term grassland expansion coupled with arid climate pulses. The new paper adds to growing evidence that scientists need to critically re-evaluate our understanding of the ancient ecosystems in which early humans evolved.

"For a long time, our field has been trying to pin down how influenced human evolution, but we've got to be able to reconstruct past environments right in the first place," said lead author Tyler Faith, curator of archaeology at the Natural History Museum of Utah and assistant professor of anthropology at the U. "If we continue to reconstruct ancient environments on the basis of modern African ecosystems, we are likely missing an entire realm of possibilities in how past ecosystems functioned. Our study invites our fellow researchers to think more critically about that."

Linking changes in mammal communities to ecosystem functions

Eastern Africa is a boon for mammal fossils, making it an ideal region to piece together ancient ecosystems over the past 7 million years. With their extensive database of both ancient and modern mammal communities, the researchers focused on three traits: diet, body size, and digestive strategy. For all of these traits, they found that the makeup of ancient herbivore communities differed significantly from those of today. This is key, as herbivores directly shape the structure of ecosystems in ways that impact a wide variety of animal and plant species.

Early humans evolved in ecosystems unlike any found today
The geographic distribution of the modern (left) and fossil (right) larger herbivore communities analyzed in the paper. Credit: Faith et. al., PNAS 2019

"Large herbivores aren't just passive parts of an ecosystem, we know that they can shape the landscape. They're eating the plants, and the biggest ones are knocking down trees or trampling soils, which collectively influences vegetation structure, fire regimes, nutrient cycling, and impacts other organisms, including humans," said Faith.

For example, modern African ecosystems are dominated by ruminants—relatives of cows and antelopes that have four compartments in their stomachs to thoroughly break down food. Non-ruminants equipped with simple stomachs are comparatively rare, with at most eight species coexisting in the same area today. Non-ruminants, including relatives of elephants, zebras, hippos, rhinos and pigs, are like digestive conveyor belts, said Faith. They eat larger quantities of plants to make up for their inefficient digestion. In contrast to the present-day pattern, eastern African fossil records document landscapes rich in non-ruminant communities, with dozens of species co-existing within the same area.

Fossil and modern communities were also vastly different in terms of body sizes. The fossil records document lots more megaherbivores than their modern counterparts. A steady decline of megaherbivores began 4.5 million years ago until they represented a more modern distribution 700,000 years ago.

Early humans evolved in ecosystems unlike any found today
A comparative analysis of fossil (gray shaded) and modern (light gray shaded) mammal communities. The study found little overlap between the types of mammals that thrived in the past versus in modern East African ecosystems. Credit: J. Tyler Faith adapted figure from Faith et. al., PNAS 2019

What is the impact of these eating machines all living together in the same places, when it's not the case today?

"These ancient herbivore communities were probably consuming far more vegetation, which means less fuel for wildfires. Because fire is an important part of modern ecosystems in Africa and favors grasslands over woodlands, it's going to fundamentally alter how things are working at the level of entire ecosystems, starting with the plant communities," adds John Rowan, co-author and postdoctoral researcher at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. "Paleontologists have been aware of that, but until now, no one's really tried to measure just how different the past was compared to the present."

Drying climate and grasslands drive a shift

What drove shifts in mammal communities over the past 7 million years? One of the most well-documented changes is the expansion of grasslands throughout the past 4 million years. Many of the fossil megaherbivores preferred wooded environments, whereas ruminants thrive in the wide-open savannas that dominate parts of eastern Africa today. The fossil record of herbivores closely follows the shifting environments, with changes in the representation of these groups tracking long-term grassland expansion.

Around 1 million years ago, fossils show a shift in mammal community dietary structure that grassland expansion alone fails to explain. The non-ruminants that had dominated eastern African ecosystems fell into a sharp decline. This corresponds to marine dust records suggesting the region experienced pulses of climate drying that would have hit non-ruminants especially hard because they depend on reliable access to surface water, meaning that many species may have disappeared alongside the rivers and lakes they depended on. Additionally, the conveyor belt eating strategy of non-ruminants relies on accessing abundant vegetation, which would have declined during periods of drought.

Looking forward

The authors do not fault previous researchers for relying so heavily on analogies with present-day African , emphasizing that a study of this scope has only recently become possible.

"Paleontology has hit a big data era," said Faith. Co-author and Colorado State University assistant professor Andrew Du added, "With the assembly of large, comprehensive datasets, we can now ask important questions that are fundamentally different from those asked in the past. We can investigate larger-scale patterns and dynamics that undoubtedly influenced the course of ."


Explore further

Human ancestors not to blame for ancient mammal extinctions in Africa

More information: J. Tyler Faith el al., "Early hominins evolved within non-analog ecosystems," PNAS (2019). www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1909284116
Provided by University of Utah
Citation: Early humans evolved in ecosystems unlike any found today (2019, October 7) retrieved 20 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-10-early-humans-evolved-ecosystems-today.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
3688 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Oct 07, 2019
So, have we already pushed the atmosphere and climate outside the range within which we evolved? Clothing and air conditioning can only do so much...

Oct 07, 2019
Wasn't oxygen levels also much higher in distant past at times?

Oct 08, 2019
What's the "distant past?" Have you any slightest idea how much longer those times are than the ones being talked about here? Do you comprehend the difference between a million and a billion?

Cranks can't count.

Oct 08, 2019
So, have we already pushed the atmosphere and climate outside the range within which we evolved? Clothing and air conditioning can only do so much...
Not quite that bad so far, but the heat is still accumulating and will until it reaches a new balance. That's going to take a while (on human timescales, in geological terms it will be very fast).

Oct 08, 2019
Wet bulb temperatures, the combination of heat and humidity that will not permit humans to discharge the heat generated by our metabolic process, is a serious limit for humans. Even sitting in the shade we would not be able to sweat and reduce our body temperature. It is not that difficult to get there and it is why we instinctively dislike humidity. 92 degrees with 90% humidity is about it, unless you have access to A/C.

Oct 08, 2019
What's the "distant past?" Have you any slightest idea how much longer those times are than the ones being talked about here? Do you comprehend the difference between a million and a billion?


If I recall Earth's oxygen levels peaked around 300M years ago and has been shrinking since with some cycles but overall shrinking. So higher 7M years ago than 1M years ago and lower still today, with some fluctuation. Just curious if that could be a factor.

Oct 08, 2019
"Around 1 million years ago, fossils show a shift in mammal community dietary structure that grassland expansion alone fails to explain."

Isn't there quite good evidence now that much of the last one or two million years or so of the development of global biodiversity and climate can be largely explained by the regular mass burning of ecosystems that archaic humans practiced on a multi continent basis to improve the success of foraging? I know for sure that earth has a bias towards pyrophytic species that did not exist before humans domesticated fire. You could even think of modern humans themselves as being specialized pyrophytes since we can't really survive or thrive without fire or cooked food, and we have extensive genetic adaptations to deal with smoke inhalation and the consumption of food char.

Couldn't this be less of a case of "humans evolved in a different environment" and something more like "the ancestors of our genus created the environment that created us" ?

Oct 09, 2019
If I recall Earth's oxygen levels peaked around 300M years ago and has been shrinking since with some cycles but overall shrinking. So higher 7M years ago than 1M years ago and lower still today, with some fluctuation. Just curious if that could be a factor.


Isn't there quite good evidence now that much of the last one or two million years or so of the development of global biodiversity and climate can be largely explained by the regular mass burning of ecosystems that archaic humans practiced on a multi continent basis to improve the success of foraging?


Vastly different time scales in these ideas, oxygen changes over 100s of millions of years vs fire using hominins in Africa, Europe and Asia for the last million year or so.

- tbctd -

Oct 09, 2019
- ctd -

To take the oxygen levels first, IIRC it takes much more change in oxygen than carbon dioxide levels to affect plants or fires. O2 is neither a bottleneck nutrient or greenhouse gas as CO2 is, nor forest fire frequency or size very sensitive to it I think.

"They have found that fires, even if ignited, will not propagate if the atmospheric oxygen concentration is below 16 percent. At our modern oxygen level of 20.9 percent, fires ignite and propagate readily. And at levels of 23 percent and higher, fires become more frequent, widespread and incredibly destructive. At these high levels, "anything that could create a spark could potentially set alight all but the wettest fuel," Lenton says." [ https://www.earth...-history ]

Their diagram suggests that O2 has been ~ 21 % for the last 40 Myrs.

- tbctd -

Oct 09, 2019
- ctd -

On the other question, I don't think we see controlled burn until modern humans started to practice it some 100 kyrs ago [ https://en.wikipe...led_burn ].

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more