Computer simulation sheds new light on colliding stars

January 8, 2019 by Andrew Lyle, University of Alberta
Artist's conception of two neutron stars colliding. A U of A researcher has created a 3-D computer simulation that gives scientists a clearer picture of what happens in the aftermath of the collision. Credit: Robin Dienel, Carnegie Institution for Science

Unprecedented detail of the aftermath of a collision between two neutron stars depicted in a 3-D computer model created by a University of Alberta astrophysicist provides a better understanding of how some of the universe's fundamental elements form in cosmic collisions.

"The collision creates including gold and lead," said Rodrigo Fernández, who worked with an international research team using supercomputers at the U.S. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center and data from a collision scientists detected in August of 2017—the first such collision ever observed.

"We also saw for the first time a gamma-ray burst from two colliding. There's a large amount of science coming out of that discovery," he added, including helping researchers calculate the mass of the neutron stars and even confirm how fast the universe is expanding.

Neutron stars are the smallest and densest stars, packing more mass than Earth's sun into an area the size of a city. When two of them collide, they merge in a flash of light and debris known as a kilonova, as material explodes outward.

Until now, computer simulations of the collisions haven't been sophisticated enough to account for where all that material ends up.

For example, the new 3-D shows that the —the collection of leftover debris that orbits the combined star—ejects twice the amount of material and at higher speeds compared with previous 2-D models.

A cross-section of the model of two colliding neutron stars shows the accretion disk in red around the black hole at the centre. The astrophysical jet is the blue funnel above and below the black hole. Credit: Rodrigo Fernández
"While our results do not fully reconcile all discrepancies, they bring the numbers closer together," Fernández said, adding that his model provides a better understanding of how heavy elements are created and ejected into space.

By modelling the aftermath of the collision in such detail, Fernández and the team were also able to account for another way matter is ejected from the collision: on an astrophysical jet, a narrow plume of particles and radiation shot out at nearly the speed of light as the collide. The jet is also thought to be the source of the gamma-ray burst.

"It was expected that we could find jets, but this is the first time we've been able to model this in enough detail to see this effect emerge," explained Fernández.

Modelling the event in 3-D was no easy task, he added. Although a star happens in just milliseconds, the accretion disk can last for seconds. Its formation also involves complex physics and many all happening at once, making it far harder for computers to simulate.

"Among the processes at work, the main culprit is actually the magnetic field acting on the matter," noted Fernández. "We know the equations that describe that process, but the only way that we can properly describe them is in 3-D. So, not only do you have to run the simulation for a long time, you also have to model it in three dimensions, which is computationally very expensive.

"The simulation's technical aspects are impressive from a scientific standpoint because the interactions are so complex."

The study, "Long-Term GRMHD Simulations of Neutron Star Merger Accretion Disks: Implications for Electromagnetic Counterparts," was published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Explore further: Gravitational waves provide dose of reality about extra dimensions

More information: Rodrigo Fernández et al. Long-term GRMHD simulations of neutron star merger accretion discs: implications for electromagnetic counterparts, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2018). DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2932

Related Stories

What are neutron stars?

October 16, 2017

Thrilled physicists and astronomers announced Monday the first-ever observation of the merger of two neutron stars, one of the most spectacularly violent phenomena in the Universe.

A better way to model stellar explosions

March 5, 2018

Neutron stars consist of the densest form of matter known: a neutron star the size of Los Angeles can weigh twice as much as our sun. Astrophysicists don't fully understand how matter behaves under these crushing densities, ...

Scientists detect biggest known black-hole collision

December 3, 2018

An international team of scientists have detected ripples in space and time, known as gravitational waves, from the biggest known black-hole collision that formed a new black hole about 80 times larger than the Sun – and ...

Earth's gold came from colliding dead stars

July 17, 2013

We value gold for many reasons: its beauty, its usefulness as jewelry, and its rarity. Gold is rare on Earth in part because it's also rare in the universe. Unlike elements like carbon or iron, it cannot be created within ...

Neutron stars on the brink of collapse

December 5, 2017

When a massive star dies, its core contracts. In a supernova explosion, the star's outer layers are expelled, leaving behind an ultra-compact neutron star. For the first time, the LIGO and Virgo Observatories have recently ...

Recommended for you

Matter waves and quantum splinters

March 25, 2019

Physicists in the United States, Austria and Brazil have shown that shaking ultracold Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) can cause them to either divide into uniform segments or shatter into unpredictable splinters, depending ...

How tree diversity regulates invading forest pests

March 25, 2019

A national-scale study of U.S. forests found strong relationships between the diversity of native tree species and the number of nonnative pests that pose economic and ecological threats to the nation's forests.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2.3 / 5 (3) Jan 08, 2019
I do think it outstanding that such statements from above are becoming The Normal:

" "Among the processes at work, the main culprit is actually the magnetic field acting on the matter," noted Fernández."

How will the denial types deal with such direct and pointed statements as this? I am NOT meaning to rile people up, I am hoping that perhaps they will get the glimmer that there is a LOT more than 'just' gravity that moves things around and accounts for various levels of regime where the magnetic outplays the gravitational.

In this case, two extremely magnetized objects collide and while gravity certainly has it's part to play in the equation, the Magnetic attraction and charge disparity and thus Electron exchange between the two would have been impressive in itself, let alone the full contact impact!

And all those fusing/fissioning nuclei are going to need their electrons back to equalize out as full atoms etc. thus setting up current flow via dynamo magnetic impulse.
1 / 5 (1) Jan 08, 2019
Oh deer steel, you've really stepped into it this time!

All the other woocultists will be chasing you with pitchforks & torches! Bleating their horror for your heresy against the EE cult dogmas.

From the abstract "... With our idealized initial magnetic field configuration, we obtain a robust jet and sufficient ejecta ..."

Hmm, I wonder what Fernández meant by "idealized"?

Oh wait, here it is...
a 3-D computer model...
...many physical processes all happening at once, making it far harder for computers to simulate
..."The simulation's technical aspects are impressive from a scientific standpoint because the interactions are so complex."

"While our results do not fully reconcile all discrepancies, they bring the numbers closer together," Fernández said,

...even confirm how fast the universe is expanding.

All of these, computer modeling, simulations. no-lightning bolt causation. With a dose of EE impossible Universal Expansion.

Steel? Duck & cover!
3 / 5 (4) Jan 08, 2019
That's quite a feat simulating the crashing together of 2 impossible objects. Did they perform the simulation before breakfast I wonder?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.