5G: a revolution not without risks

5G is touted as being able to enable self-driving cars and the internet of things, but greater reliance on communications networ
5G is touted as being able to enable self-driving cars and the internet of things, but greater reliance on communications networks also poses risks

The recent diplomatic dust-up over Chinese telecoms company Huawei, one of the leaders in developing equipment for fifth-generation mobile networks, has demonstrated that this technology which promises to enable an internet of things and self-driving vehicles also poses risks.

What is 5G, what will it be able to do, and what are the risks?

What is 5G?

5G stands for the fifth generation of mobile technology, which should begin to be rolled out in 2020 in Asia and the United States.

Each generation has offered improvements in data transmission speed and capacity, and with 5G the networks are really set to make the transition from telephony to other objects.

What will it be able to do?

The much vaunted has so far been hobbled by the limitations of , both in terms of transmission speeds of handsets and the fact the backbone of networks hadn't been expanded sufficiently in many cases to handle huge volumes of data.

With 5G, transmission speeds should accelerate sufficiently to allow for self-driving cars to take to the roads or for doctors to conduct operations remotely.

It will also cut the cord on augmented and virtual reality.

The ability to connect more sensors will help make many services "intelligent", such as helping manage traffic flow and telling the sanitation department when garbage bins need to be emptied.

5G should facilitate the adoption of self-driving cars, like this one being tested in the northern Italian city of Turin in Nove
5G should facilitate the adoption of self-driving cars, like this one being tested in the northern Italian city of Turin in November

Industry is in particular looking forward to 5G to reinvent manufacturing and allow it to monitor all sorts of processes.

Why does 5G pose security risks?

The first reason is that more data and more types of data will be travelling across 5G networks. Much of the data transmitted by sensors could be sensitive, such as information about manufacturing processes that business rivals would be interested in acquiring. Or the data from our homes that could be gleaned to determine all sorts of things about us. The treasure chest of data for hackers is getting much, much bigger.

A second reason is that an increased reliance on the mobile network means its disruption would have even more serious consequences, both in terms of safety and economic activity. A failure during a remotely guided operation could lead to the death of a patient or a crash of a self-driving car. A longer outage could disrupt an economy. This poses national security risks.

While the diplomatic spat over the arrest of Huawei's was based on accusations the firm violated US sanctions on Iran, the United States has longstanding concerns about Chinese telecommunications equipment being a Trojan horse for Beijing's intelligence and military.

Huawei is a major manufacturer of equipment used to build 5G networks, and the US defence establishment fears it could enable it to disrupt American military communications or otherwise wage asymmetrical warfare in a confrontation.

Could they turn off the lights? The more various systems are connected to networks the greater the risk an attack could cripple
Could they turn off the lights? The more various systems are connected to networks the greater the risk an attack could cripple the economy

The United States has essentially barred use of Huawei equipment in domestic networks, as have Australia and New Zealand, with other countries considering following suit.

Deliverance or disappointment?

The promises are always hyped, but the delivery is often a disappointment. Early buyers of 4G smartphones were often let down: their handsets could handle nippy speeds but the backbone of networks were often not yet bulked up to handle the higher data flow.

Operators have now built up the capacity of their backbone networks, but if 5G is to keep its promise the number of base stations needed is enormous. Otherwise, users will be forced back onto slower networks.

Meanwhile operators are having to invest billions to roll out 5G, which is an issue because competition in many countries has hemmed in prices companies can charge consumers.

The number of base stations needed is enormous for 5G to keep its promise
The number of base stations needed is enormous for 5G to keep its promise

While most analysts believe operators will in the end be able to finance building the new networks, they may not initially be dense enough to handle some of the most anticipated applications.

Building a dense network of base stations along highways to handle self-driving vehicles will be a costly endeavour, for example, and operators may find themselves seeking partners from users of new services.


Explore further

'No evidence' of Huawei spying, says German IT watchdog

© 2018 AFP

Citation: 5G: a revolution not without risks (2018, December 16) retrieved 17 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2018-12-5g-revolution.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
35 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Dec 18, 2018
"Building a dense network of base stations along highways to handle self-driving vehicles will be a costly endeavour, for example, and operators may find themselves seeking partners from users of new services."

China Tower has a total of approximately 1.9 million wireless sites, compared to approximately 200,000 in the United States.10 This means the United States has 0.4 sites compared to China's 5.3 sites for every 10 square miles. Comparing tower density on a per capita basis is marginally more equitable, where the United States lags China by approximately three times.

Dec 18, 2018
There's gonna have to be authentication and authorization built in before this stuff controls nuclear reactors of for that matter oil refineries.

Dec 18, 2018
In summary the government fear the 'reckless' usage of Networking that could jeopardise the national security. This is understandable; as nobody should connect industrial subsystem to the internet as it is a costly & sensitive hardware, but operators tend to do it anyway out of convenience, eg: to allow remote C&C for multiple plants & factory, which open the door to attack. Eg; the like of Stuxnet, where an Uranium refining facility in Iran was sabotaged by Israeli cybertroopers by a virus called Stuxnet. In context, they used a commercially available system, nothing fishy, but open them to internet out of convenience.

Rather than fearmongering the industries, why not regulate them? set some rules while not hindering 5G deployment for non-critical infrastructure. To refuse that is to handicap ourselves (your nation) by not allowing a technology to be deployed. If you're scared, just take responsibility, set up a regulation!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more