Physicists build fractal shape out of electrons

"Electrons in 1.58 dimensions? What the frac!" Utrecht physicists build fractal shape out of electrons
Electrons in bonding (left) and non-bonding (right) Sierpiński triangles; scale bar 2nm. Credit: Kempkes et al., Nature Physics, 2018

In physics, it is well-known that electrons behave very differently in three dimensions, two dimensions or one dimension. These behaviours give rise to different possibilities for technological applications and electronic systems. But what happens if electrons live in 1.58 dimensions – and what does it actually mean? Theoretical and experimental physicists at Utrecht University investigated these questions in a new study that will be published in Nature Physics on 12 November.

It may be difficult to imagine 1.58 dimensions, but the idea is more familiar to you than you think at first glance. Non-integer dimensions, such as 1.58, can be found in structures, such as lungs. A fractal is a self-similar structure that scales in a different way than normal objects: If you zoom in, you will see the same structure again. For example, a small piece of Romanesco broccoli typically looks similar to the whole head of broccoli. In electronics, fractals are used in antennas for their properties of receiving and transmitting signals in a large frequency range.

A relatively new topic in fractals is the quantum behaviour that emerges if you zoom in all the way to the scale of . Using a quantum simulator, Utrecht physicists Sander Kempkes and Marlou Slot were able to build such a fractal out of electrons. The researchers made a 'muffin tin' in which the electrons would confine to a fractal shape, by placing in just the right shape on a copper background with a scanning tunneling microscope. The resulting triangular fractal shape in which the electrons were confined is called a Sierpiński triangle, which has a fractal dimension of 1.58. The researchers observed that the electrons in the triangle actually behave as if they live in 1.58 dimensions.

The results from the study show how bonding (left image) and non-bonding Sierpiński (right image) triangles are separated in energy, yielding nice opportunities for transmitting currents through these fractal structures. In the bonding case, the electrons are connected and can easily go from one place to another (high transmission), whereas in the non-bonding case they are not connected and need to "jump" to another place (low transmission). Also, by calculating the dimension of the electronic wavefunction, the researchers observed that the electrons themselves are confined to this dimension and the wavefunctions inherit this fractional dimension.

"From a theoretical point of view, this is a very interesting and groundbreaking result," says theoretical physicist Cristiane de Morais Smith, who supervised the study together with Ingmar Swart and Daniel Vanmaekelbergh. "It opens a whole new line of research, raising questions such as: what does it actually mean for electrons to be confined in non-integer dimensions? Do they behave more like in one or in two dimensions? And what happens if a magnetic field is turned on perpendicularly to the sample? Fractals already have a very large number of applications, so these results may have a big impact on research at the quantum scale."

More information: Design and characterization of electrons in a fractal geometry, Sander N. Kempkes, Marlou R. Slot, Saoirsé E. Freeney, Stephan J.M. Zevenhuizen, Daniël Vanmaekelbergh, Ingmar Swart, Cristiane Morais Smith, Nature Physics, 12 November 2018, DOI: 10.1038/s41567-018-0328-0

Journal information: Nature Physics

Citation: Physicists build fractal shape out of electrons (2018, November 12) retrieved 12 July 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

'Quantum simulator' facilitates research into theoretical supermaterials


Feedback to editors