In India, swapping crops could save water and improve nutrition

July 4, 2018, Columbia University
Rice farmers in India. Credit: Kevin Krajick

India will need to feed approximately 394 million more people by 2050, and that's going to be a significant challenge. Nutrient deficiencies are already widespread in India today—30 percent or more are anemic—and many regions are chronically water-stressed. Making matters worse, evidence suggests that monsoons are delivering less rainfall than they used to. But a study published today in Science Advances shares a brighter outlook: replacing some rice with less thirsty crops could dramatically reduce water demand in India, while also improving nutrition.

Starting in the 1960s, a boom in rice and wheat production helped reduce hunger throughout India. Unfortunately, this Green Revolution also took a toll on the environment, increasing demands on the water supply, , and pollution from fertilizer.

"If we continue to go the route of rice and wheat, with unsustainable resource use and increasing climate variability, it's unclear how long we could keep that practice up," says Kyle Davis, a fellow at Columbia University's Earth Institute and lead author on the new study. "That's why we're thinking of ways to better align food security and environmental goals."

The study addresses two key objectives of the Indian government: to reduce undernourishment and improve nutrition, and to promote sustainable water use.

A Grain of Truth

Davis and his colleagues studied six major grains currently grown in India: rice, wheat, maize, sorghum, and pearl and finger millet. For each crop, they compared yield, water use, and nutritional values such as calories, protein, iron, and zinc.

They found that rice is the least water-efficient cereal when it comes to producing nutrients, and that wheat has been the main driver in increasing irrigation stresses.

The potential benefits of replacing rice with alternative crops varied widely between different regions, depending on how much the crops could rely on rainfall instead of irrigation. But overall, the researchers found that replacing rice with maize, finger millet, pearl millet, or sorghum could reduce irrigation by 33 percent, while improving production of iron by 27 percent and zinc by 13 percent.

In some instances, those improvements came with a slight reduction in the number of calories produced, because rice has been bred to have higher yields per unit of land. So in some regions there's a tradeoff between water and land use efficiency, but Davis thinks that with more attention from scientists, the alternative crops could develop higher yields as well. For now, rice replacement isn't a one-size-fits-all solution, but something that should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis for each district, he said.

Going Against the Grain

While the findings are promising, the authors stop short of making policy recommendations—yet. First, says Davis, they'd like to add other variables into the analysis, including greenhouse gas emissions, climate sensitivity, and how much labor and money it takes to grow each crop.

In addition, the team wants to study Indian food preferences, to see if people would be willing to incorporate more of these alternative cereals into their diets. Davis is hopeful; "There are places around India where these crops continue to be consumed in pretty large amounts," he says, "and there were even more a generation or two ago, so it's still within the cultural memory."

India's state-run Public Distribution System (PDS) could be an ally in influencing consumer preferences. PDS currently subsidizes and wheat to support smallholder farmers and low-income households. Those subsidies have given incentives to farmers and consumers to plant and buy those crops, but future policies could help to encourage the use of the more nutritious, water-saving cereals like millet and sorghum.

Momentum is growing in support of alternative grains. Some Indian states are have already started pilot programs to grow more of these , and the Indian government is calling 2018 the 'Year of Millets.'

"If the government is able to get people more interested in eating millets, the production will organically respond to that," says Davis. "If you have more demand, then people will pay a better price for it, and farmers will be more willing to plant it."

Explore further: Swapping where crops are grown could feed an extra 825 million people

More information: K.F. Davis el al., "Alternative cereals can improve water use and nutrient supply in India," Science Advances (2018). advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/7/eaao1108

Related Stories

Legumes for a sustainable farming future

May 11, 2018

Climate change and food security are two of the greatest challenges facing humanity. At Swinburne, Professor Mark Adams is exploring how legumes can play a role in sustainable agriculture.

Has the green revolution really succeeded?

July 20, 2015

Over the past 50 years, human population has more than doubled, but cereal-crop production has grown even faster. Mechanization, synthetic fertilizers, new high-yield seeds and other advances in intensified agriculture have ...

Recommended for you

Propping up glaciers to avoid cataclysmic sea level rise

September 20, 2018

As global warming outpaces efforts to tame it, scientists have proposed building massive underwater structures to prevent an Antarctic glacier the size of Britain from sliding into the sea and lifting the world's oceans by ...

NASA balloon mission captures electric blue clouds

September 20, 2018

On the cusp of our atmosphere live a thin group of seasonal electric blue clouds. Forming 50 miles above the poles in summer, these clouds are known as noctilucent clouds or polar mesospheric clouds—PMCs. A recent NASA ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

doogsnova
3 / 5 (2) Jul 04, 2018
Or they could stop having children until the population size is naturally reduced.
But hey, what do I know?
Thorium Boy
4 / 5 (1) Jul 05, 2018
The country is dirt poor by Western standards and they have children so the children can take care of them in old age. Contrast this with the West where young people are so frigging spoiled they live with their parents until their 30s instead of experiencing a drop in their standard of llving.
rrwillsj
3 / 5 (2) Jul 05, 2018
Yeah doogs, great idea. Now all you have to do is the trivial act of belling that cat. Many, many males, globally, measure their masculinity by how many children they father and aggressive domination of females. Do you really believe those males will listen to good advice?

Yeah TB but First Worlder affluenza is only part of the problem. Parents who direct their children away from trade schools. Parents refusing to accept that half of everybody are on the low-end of the IQ/astuteness scale.

Where are the jobs for those raised to expect upper-class positions and wages? What other occupation are they prepared for?

Somebody once sort of said that our grand-children will be artists and scholars and musicians.

If I had to try to earn a living based upon my non-existent talents? I'd be a walking cliche for "Starving Artist!"

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.