Great Barrier Reef corals can survive global warming for another century

April 19, 2018, University of Texas at Austin
The red coral in the middle of this image is a staghorn coral, or A. millepora. Credit: Mikhail Matz

Using genetic samples and computer simulations, evolutionary biologists have made a glass-half-full forecast: Corals in the Great Barrier Reef have enough genetic variation to adapt to and survive rising ocean temperatures for at least another century, or more than 50 years longer than previous estimates have suggested.

"It means these corals will still go extinct if we do nothing," said Mikhail Matz, associate professor in The University of Texas at Austin's Department of Integrative Biology and lead researcher on the project. "But it also means we have a chance to save them. It buys us time to actually do something about global warming, which is the main problem."

The results of their work are published in the April 19 edition of the journal PLOS Genetics. Matz's co-authors are Galina Aglyamova at UT Austin, Eric Treml at the University of Melbourne and Line Bay at the Australian Institute of Marine Science.

The source of the coral's resilience lies in genetic variations across connected but widely dispersed populations. One of the major reef-building corals on the Great Barrier Reef is a species of staghorn coral called Acropora millepora. In a 2015 paper in the journal Science, Matz and his colleagues demonstrated that within this same species of coral, some individuals have genes that make them more heat tolerant than others.

A close-up of staghorn coral, A. millepora. Credit: Mikhail Matz

Each coral colony produces a million larvae every year, and those larvae float on currents for up to several weeks until settling on a new reef. As conditions change in a particular location—for example, the water warms—individuals of the species that are less adapted die while better-adapted individuals thrive. Over time, if incoming larvae supply genetic variants for increased hardiness, the local population shifts to the hardier variety.

"This genetic variation is like fuel for natural selection," Matz said. "If there is enough of it, evolution can be remarkably fast, because all it needs to do is reshuffle the existing variants between the populations. It doesn't have to wait for a new mutation to appear; it's already there. The problem is, when the is exhausted, it is over and the future is unclear."

The researchers adapted methods used to study how human populations have evolved across the globe to study how connected populations of on the Great Barrier Reef evolve. To reconstruct patterns of larval migration, a key driver of population-level evolution, they used thousands of genetic variants from five sites across the reef, as well as a biophysical model of larval dispersal via currents.

Some researchers are attempting to create super corals in the laboratory, including through genetic engineering, but that is not what Matz recommends. Rather, he thinks researchers should focus on learning more about genetics and passing that information on to those involved in conservation efforts. Matz thinks efforts to alter corals in the lab are misguided—in part because scientists don't really know how coral genes work and also because there is a more efficient way to help corals evolve.

Corals on the Great Barrier Reef. Credit: Eric Matson, Australian Institute of Marine Science
"One way to jump-start coral adaptation would be to move coral colonies bearing potentially adaptive genetic variants among populations and let them breed with the locals," said Matz. "Just provide more fuel for natural selection at each location so there's more to choose from."

Next, the researchers plan to conduct experiments to verify that their model's predictions match how real coral populations are currently evolving. They plan to combine taken from corals at five sites across the Great Barrier Reef in the early 2000s with ones taken at the same sites over the next five years to build a 20-year map of actual genetic changes that can be compared with model predictions.

According to a report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 2014, without major reductions in , global surface temperatures are forecast to rise more than 2 degrees Celsius by the end of the century (relative to the start of the century). The oceans absorb more than 90 percent of the heat trapped by increases in greenhouse gas emissions.

Corals live in colonies with colorful algae that provide them nutrients. When the surrounding water warms too much, the algae can produce toxins, forcing corals to expel them, leaving the a ghostly white. Unless temperatures drop again soon, the corals may die of starvation or disease. A major bleaching event killed large sections of the Great Barrier Reef in 2016 and 2017.

Explore further: Corals are already adapting to global warming, scientists say

More information: Matz MV, Treml EA, Aglyamova GV, Bay LK (2018) Potential and limits for rapid genetic adaptation to warming in a Great Barrier Reef coral. PLoS Genet 14(4): e1007220. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007220

Related Stories

Can corals adapt to climate change?

November 1, 2017

Cool-water corals can adapt to a slightly warmer ocean, but only if global greenhouse gas emissions are reduced. That's according to a study published November 1 in the journal Science Advances of genetic adaptation and the ...

Recommended for you

Machine learning-detected signal predicts time to earthquake

December 18, 2018

Machine-learning research published in two related papers today in Nature Geoscience reports the detection of seismic signals accurately predicting the Cascadia fault's slow slippage, a type of failure observed to precede ...

The full story on climate change requires the long view

December 17, 2018

The science is clear that human activities over the last century have contributed to greenhouse-like warming of the Earth's surface. Much of the global conversation around climate change fixates on what individual countries ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Turgent
1 / 5 (2) Apr 20, 2018
In a previous discussion of ocean acidification this argument was raised. The AGW and CC alarmists couldn't accept this because they had no understanding of;

1. What a 30% in +H means when pH is 8.
2. The genetic adaptability of mass numbers of small organisms.

Nature finds a way, Gaia protects, and fools drink their Kool-Aid.

Strange this is the only comment.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.