New study shows freshwater input route from melting ice led to rapid cooling

January 25, 2018 by Mark Floyd, Oregon State University

Scientists have long known that a reduction in Atlantic Ocean currents bringing warm water to the Northern Hemisphere from the tropics created abrupt cooling known as the Younger Dryas cold period nearly 13,000 years ago, but the cause of this phenomenon has not been proved.

Now a team of scientists from the United States and Canada think they have the answer – input of from the Laurentide Ice Sheet retreating from the Lake Superior basin, creating a river through the lower Great Lakes to the Gulf of St. Lawrence and the North Atlantic.

The findings are important because it could happen again, a result of both the Greenland Ice Sheet melting and a significant rise in fresh water from the Arctic through increased rain and snow. The study also highlights how sensitive the Atlantic current is to changes in the input of fresh water.

Results of the study have been published online in Geology, a publication of the Geological Society of America.

"It has been well-documented that the Atlantic , or AMOC, slowed because of fresh water, but there has been little agreement as to how," noted Anders Carlson, an Oregon State University geologist and co-author on the study. "Some scientists have argued for years that it has been this freshwater path, but others say the region was still iced in when the cooling period begun.

"Some people have even speculated that a comet caused the cooling period. We found convincing evidence, however, that it was fresh water – a river the size of the Mississippi that flowed into the North Atlantic."

The key to the research team's discovery came from the sampling of boulders in the region where the Laurentide Ice Sheet once dominated the Northern Hemisphere, covering some 5 million square miles and reaching a thickness of 8,000 to 10,000 feet at some points. The last glaciation was at a maximum about 23,000 years ago and dominated the landscape until it began retreating as the planet warmed.

The glacial retreat took more than 10,000 years, Carlson noted, but the "tipping point" that caused the reduction of the Atlantic current may have happened in a single summer.

"As the retreated, there were enormous freshwater lakes that drained down the Mississippi and into the Gulf of Mexico," Carlson said. "But at some point, the Lake Superior region became ice-free and it was like removing a dam. That water shifted from a southern drainage to an eastern drainage, and into the North Atlantic."

The result was a significant cooling of the North Atlantic that led to lower temperatures on land – as much as 10 degrees Celsius (or about 18 degrees Fahrenheit) in a little more than a century.

Carlson and his colleagues went into the field to see if they could find out when the Lake Superior basin became ice-free, thus opening up the freshwater pathway to the North Atlantic. They sampled boulders throughout the region to see how long they had been exposed to . As those cosmic rays hit the quartz in the rock, it splits the elements and creates beryllium-10.

"Essentially what we did was to measure the sunburn on the rocks," Carlson said. "The cosmic bombardment by neutrons leaves a clear picture of just when those boulders were first exposed to the sun. The evidence shows that Lake Superior was deglaciated 13,000 years ago, much earlier than was previously thought."

The boulder evidence was made possible through the use of a mass spectrometer roughly the size of a basketball court at Purdue University. The technique, referred to as accelerator mass spectrometry, utilizes an older-generation nuclear physics particle accelerator to measure individual atoms – in this case, beryllium-10 – produced in these boulders by cosmic rays.

"This new approach allows us to narrow the time range of when areas become ice-free from millennial time scales down to a few centuries," said Marc Caffee, a Purdue physicist and co-author on the study. "Going forward, it will allow us to be much more precise in measuring the retreat of ice margins and their relationship to climate change. A key to understanding future climate change is a detailed understanding of past climate changes."

Although the results of this study may have resolved a long-standing controversy, the researchers say, many aspects of past climate change are still poorly understood. The cosmic bombardment of surface materials provides a clock that researchers can use to understand cause-and-effect relationships in past climate changes.

It would take a significant increase in freshwater input into the North Atlantic to overturn the currents again, Carlson pointed out – the melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet over some 1,300 years along with a huge increase in fresh from the Arctic.

"Models show that as the planet warms the Arctic will receive more snow in the winter and more rain in the summer," Carlson said. "The increase in precipitation is already happening."

Explore further: Research shows ice sheets as large as Greenland's melted fast in a warming climate

Related Stories

How the Arctic Ocean became saline

June 6, 2017

The Arctic Ocean was once a gigantic freshwater lake. Only after the land bridge between Greenland and Scotland had submerged far enough did vast quantities of salt water pour in from the Atlantic. With the help of a climate ...

Recommended for you

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

dustywells
1 / 5 (3) Jan 28, 2018
More media fakery? Another hypothesis reported as proof positive?

The headline says: "study shows freshwater input route from melting ice led to rapid cooling" while the copy says:"a team of scientists from the United States and Canada think they have the answer"

I have no argument with the content of the report. However, "study shows" implies a proven hypothesis that fresh water input disrupted the warm Atlantic current, while the report goes on to say that the scientists "sampled boulders throughout the region to see how long they had been exposed to cosmic rays" and measured the amount of beryllium-10.

While I agree that it appears that there may be a relationship simply because of the time-frame involved, it does not justify the inflated headline.
rrwillsj
1 / 5 (1) Feb 01, 2018
Well dw, the clickbait headlines get us to read the articles. And the site managers are hoping we'll take a gander at the advertising. Cause they are the ones paying to maintain this site. The firstest with the mostest eyeballs. What works works.

You and I may resent being manipulated.... Again! And again! What does it say about us that we keep coming back to keep snapping at the shiny lures?

In addition, all too many academic researchers are under enormous pressure to publish or perish! The all know that these articles are just a claptrap-stopgap to continue receiving any funding. As well as gaining professional accreditation and recognition in their field. Sounds like lemmings, doesn't it? Yet it is the reality in today's science culture.

The ancient excuse "Everybody else is doing it! So I better do it too!"

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.