Paris Climate Agreement targets challenged

December 21, 2017, University of Adelaide

New research into the targets set out in the Paris Climate Agreement challenges conventional wisdom on the way that global warming and climate change should be tackled in the long term.

Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the 2015 'Paris Agreement' on sets out temperature targets that signatories of the Agreement should strive to achieve, by cutting and other greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon dioxide is believed to be the primary cause of rising temperatures and climate change.

Australia is one of the 196 signatories to the Agreement.

The Agreement recommends that the Earth's average temperature should be reduced to a level not much above what it was before the world industrialised. The is for temperatures to return to either "well below" 2°C above the pre-industrial level, or, if possible, only 1.5°C above in the era before increased dramatically.

The paper, published online in the journal Climatic Change, challenges current thinking on how to meet the targets that seek to avoid the consequences of climate change, such as rising sea levels.

"Present research focuses on the effect that cutting carbon dioxide and other will have on global temperatures," says research author Adjunct Professor Tom Wigley from the University of Adelaide's Environment Institute.

"A new approach to the emissions vs temperature conundrum is required. My research turns the equation on its head and reverses the analysis to start with a temperature target and determine what emissions are required to meet this target.

"The results are surprising as they show that, although drastic cuts to carbon dioxide emissions are required, they may be less than the current belief that they must be reduced to zero, or even to negative levels before 2100, provided some flexibility is allowed in the pathway to the eventual target," he says.

"If this new approach, that analyses how possible future changes affect the atmosphere, is adopted, then unpopular and possibly unachievable reductions in carbon dioxide may not be required to meet the Agreement's eventual targets. In the short-term, however, the cuts required are still large and rapid.

"When faced with unpopular methods of reducing emissions such as nuclear power, and concentrating on intermittent renewable energy sources such as wind and solar, signatories may find that their proposed cuts to emissions are unachievable. The problem is so large that no form of carbon-free energy can be ignored.

"Furthermore, even if signatories to the Agreement manage to meet the Agreement's targets they will still not be sufficient to avoid the predicted risks associated with rising sea levels," Professor Wigley says.

"In order to effectively tackle one of society's greatest challenges, robust analysis such as this, that challenges conventional 'wisdom', must be considered before local solutions can effectively contribute to long-term global targets."

Explore further: Leading doctors back legal action to force UK government to cut carbon emissions

Related Stories

Video: How do we verify climate treaties?

October 18, 2017

As of May 2017, about 90 percent of all countries around the world have committed to the ambitious Paris Agreement to combat global climate change. The shared goal is to rein in greenhouse gas emissions enough to maintain ...

New hope for limiting warming to 1.5 C

September 18, 2017

Significant emission reductions are required if we are to achieve one of the key goals of the Paris Agreement, and limit the increase in global average temperatures to 1.5°C; a new Oxford University partnership warns.

Recommended for you

What rising seas mean for local economies

February 15, 2019

Impacts from climate change are not always easy to see. But for many local businesses in coastal communities across the United States, the evidence is right outside their doors—or in their parking lots.

Where is the universe hiding its missing mass?

February 15, 2019

Astronomers have spent decades looking for something that sounds like it would be hard to miss: about a third of the "normal" matter in the Universe. New results from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory may have helped them ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.