Study finds no-tillage not sufficient alone to prevent water pollution from nitrate

September 22, 2017
A no-till field. Credit: Indiana University

A new IUPUI study funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture answers a long-debated agricultural question: whether no-tillage alone is sufficient to prevent water pollution from nitrate. The answer is no.

Researchers in the Department of Earth Sciences in the School of Science at IUPUI conducted a meta-analysis to compare runoff and of nitrate from no-till and conventional tillage agricultural fields. Surface runoff and leaching are two major transportation pathways for nitrate to reach and pollute .

Due to its mobility and water solubility, nitrate has long been recognized as a widespread water pollutant.

"What we found is that no-till is not sufficient to improve water quality," said Lixin Wang, an assistant professor and corresponding author of the paper. "In fact, we found that no-till increased nitrogen leaching."

The study suggests that no-till needs to be complemented with other techniques, such as cover cropping and intercropping or rotation with perennial crops, to improve nitrate retention and water-quality benefits.

After studying concentration of nitrate—nitrate amount per water volume unit—and nitrate load, or total amount of nitrate, researchers found surface runoff from no-till fields to contain a similar nitrate load to surface runoff from conventional tillage fields.

In contrast, nitrate load via leaching was greater with no-till fields than with conventional tillage fields.

No-till leaves crop residue on the soil surface and limits soil disturbance except for small slits to add fertilizer. An estimated 20 percent of all croplands in the U.S. are under no-till management. It reduces soil erosion by avoiding tilling year after year, which leads to soil getting washed away into lakes and rivers. Because reducing soil loss reduces nutrient loss, it was assumed that no-till would reduce water pollution, Wang said.

"Overall, we found the adoption of no-till resulted in increased nitrate loss via leaching due to the frequent occurrence of macropores, such as those created by dead roots and earthworm burrows, in soils that have been under long-range no-tillage management," Wang said.

Researchers examined how nitrate loss through and leaching were impacted by other factors, including aridity, rainfall variability, texture, crop species, duration of tillage and fertilizer type.

The research findings are presented in a paper, "Impacts of no-tillage management on loss from corn, soybean and wheat cultivation: A meta analysis," that was published Sept. 21 in the journal Scientific Reports.

Explore further: Crops from no-till fields may need spring nitrogen boost

Related Stories

Crops from no-till fields may need spring nitrogen boost

May 2, 2014

No-till crop production provides benefits through reduced soil erosion and soil moisture loss, which potentially increases yield. However, no-till fields with wheat stubble may need a nitrogen boost in the spring above that ...

Modeling nutrient loss from Midwestern crop fields

February 5, 2015

In many Midwestern crop fields, excess water laden with nitrates drains into subsurface tile pipes and then flows into surface streams and rivers in the Mississippi River watershed. When the nutrient-rich field drainage reaches ...

Recommended for you

New research could predict La Nina drought years in advance

November 16, 2017

Two new studies from The University of Texas at Austin have significantly improved scientists' ability to predict the strength and duration of droughts caused by La Niña - a recurrent cooling pattern in the tropical Pacific ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

michael_frishberg
not rated yet Sep 23, 2017
Terrific, let's poison the environment while we grow food. That's a strategy for sustainability (not).
In fact, not one human endeavor is sustainable, ecologically speaking.
Nature Bats Last
Turgent
not rated yet Sep 23, 2017
What a surprise. Lets ensure that the criminal corn ethanol subsidy remains in place so 40% of all corn will go to bio-fuel. Lets not forger the phosphates and uranium which is also dumped into the environment by this policy.

Guess the farm lobby and green lobby are united in ecological destruction.
Da Schneib
not rated yet Sep 24, 2017
Hahaha, the oldest method, and the one the whiners decry as "gummint interference" the most often, works the best: crop rotation.

Teh stupit, it burnz.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.