Researchers demonstrate how some genes evolved from an immune function to an olfactory role in some mammals

June 26, 2017
Mammals express Fprs in their immune cells (yellow). A first genomic accident led to the expression of an Fpr in olfactory neurons of a rodents' ancestor (dark blue). This was followed by a second accident that occurred in the mouse lineage (light blue). Credit: © UNIGE

Mammals possess several lines of defense against microbes. One of them is activated when receptors called Fprs, which are present on immune cells, bind to specific molecules that are linked to pathogens. Researchers at the University of Geneva (UNIGE), Switzerland, showed in 2009 that these same receptors were also present in the nose of mice, probably to detect contaminated food or to avoid sick conspecifics. The biologists now describe in the journal PNAS how Fprs have acquired this olfactory role during rodent evolution, moving from the immune system to a neuronal system. This innovation results from two genomic 'accidents' that occurred several millions years apart during the evolution of rodents.

"We wanted to understand how Fprs evolved to be expressed at the surface of and acquire a new function", explains Quentin Dietschi, from the laboratory of professor Ivan Rodriguez at the Department of Genetics and Evolution of the Faculty of Science of UNIGE and co-first author of the study, expanding the research of 2009, already led by professor Rodriguez. The biologists, in collaboration with Alan Carleton, professor at the Department of Fundamental Neurosciences of the UNIGE Medical School, have demonstrated that this genetic innovation is due to two genomic accidents that occurred during rodent evolution. It is by comparing the DNA sequences of various rodent species that the researchers were able to go back in time and follow the evolution of the targeted genes.

Immune receptors as olfactory receptors

We rarely transmit a perfect copy of our genome to our offspring. These differences from one generation to the next are sometimes at the origin of important innovations. "During , a gene encoding one of the Fprs landed near a DNA sequence regulating the expression of an olfactory receptor. This regulatory element was thus hijacked, allowing the expression of the Fpr at the expense of that of the original olfactory receptor", says Joel Tuberosa, co-first author of the article. Thus, the ancestor of today's hamsters, rats and mice acquired a new olfactory capacity, probably that of scenting traces of microbes present in its environment.

A new sensory toolbox

Some tens of millions years later, in the ancestor of mice, a gene encoding an immune Fpr landed again near an olfactory regulatory element, but a different one. This small has thus acquired an additional tool to detect with its nose different molecular cues linked to pathogens.

This research constitutes an exemplary case describing how, thanks to two genetic hijacks only, a family of has converted from sensors of the internal world into sensors of the outside world.

Explore further: Genetics and environment combine to give everyone a unique sense of smell

More information: Quentin Dietschi el al., "Evolution of immune chemoreceptors into sensors of the outside world," PNAS (2017). www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1704009114

Related Stories

Deciphering the olfactory receptor code

August 31, 2015

In animals, numerous behaviors are governed by the olfactory perception of their surrounding world. Whether originating in the nose of a mammal or the antennas of an insect, perception results from the combined activation ...

Recommended for you

The strange case of the scuba-diving fly

November 20, 2017

More than a century ago, American writer Mark Twain observed a curious phenomenon at Mono Lake, just to the east of Yosemite National Park: enormous numbers of small flies would crawl underwater to forage and lay eggs, but ...

Chimp females who leave home postpone parenthood

November 20, 2017

New moms need social support, and mother chimpanzees are no exception. So much so that female chimps that lack supportive friends and family wait longer to start having babies, according to researchers who have combed through ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

BubbaNicholson
1 / 5 (2) Jun 27, 2017
The generally accepted mechanical G protein cascade explanation of transduction takes too long to explain the much shorter latencies observed. I think receptor proteins adrift in the receptor lymph sequester ions, releasing them via conformational change on contact with chemical stimulus, resulting in change in potential and the potential difference or voltage with reference to a dendritic receptor membrane, but that's just me. Aside from that quibble, this is a very fine paper, easy to understand thankfully, and convincing. We have come a long way from the days of my youth when geneticists talked of "junk DNA" when all the junk was between their silly ears.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.