Eavesdropping on the particular chatter on the sub-atomic world

April 5, 2017 by Kandice Carter, The College of William & Mary
Eavesdropping on the particular chatter on the sub-atomic world
One supercomputer wouldn’t do  Jozef Dudek (left), staff scientist at Jefferson Lab and an assistant professor of physics at William & Mary, worked with JLab’s Robert Edwards to run complex quantum chromodynamics calculations on several supercomputers. Credit: Jefferson Lab

Much like two friendly neighbors getting together to chat over a cup of coffee, the minuscule particles in our sub-atomic world also come together to engage in a kind of conversation. Now, nuclear scientists are developing tools to allow them to listen in on the particles' gab fests and learn more about how they stick together to build our visible universe.

Jozef Dudek is a staff scientist at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Jefferson Lab and an assistant professor of physics at William & Mary. He and his colleagues recently carried out the first complex calculations of a particle called the sigma. They published the result in Physical Review Letters in January.

"The sigma is often thought of as being part of the that holds protons and neutrons together in the nucleus," Dudek explained. "You can think of there being a force between a proton and a neutron, which is due to the exchange of between them. One of the particles that a proton and a neutron may exchange is the sigma."

This exchange of sigma particles by protons and neutrons allows them to communicate through the . The strong force is the force of nature that binds protons and neutrons into nuclei. In fact, the strong force is also responsible for the formation of protons and neutrons.

In decades of delving deep inside the heart of matter to uncover its building blocks, nuclear physicists so far have found that the smallest bits of matter are quarks. It takes three quarks to build a proton (and three to build a neutron). These quarks are bound together by the strong force, again through a conversation between quarks that manifests as the exchange of particles. In this case, the quarks swap strong-force 'glue'—particles called gluons.

So, if particles are able to converse via the exchange of strong force gluons directly, where does that leave the sigma? It turns out that if a proton and a neutron are really close together, they can hold their conversation with a simple swap of gluons. But in a spacious nucleus, it takes other particles, including the sigma, to converse efficiently.

"At larger distances, it makes sense to think about exchanging mesons between nucleons, where mesons are built out of quarks and gluons themselves, but sort of packaged up into confined packets," Dudek said .

These 'confined packets' may be the sigma, which is a meson built of quarks and gluons, or another meson called the pion, familiar to physicists as a particle that is often found hanging around the nucleus.

To put it all together, protons and neutrons may chat it up via the exchange of gluons at short distances, sigma mesons at medium distances and pions at larger distances.

Calculating the heart of matter

If this all sounds rather complicated, that's because it is. Dudek and his colleagues are the first to calculate the sigma particle directly from the theory that describes the strong force, the particles that interact through this force and the nature of those interactions. This theory is called quantum chromodynamics or simply QCD.

In fact, these calculations were so complicated, supercomputers were required to accomplish the feat.

According to Robert Edwards, a senior staff scientist in Jefferson Lab's Center for Theoretical and Computational Physics, the QCD calculations required the dedicated effort of several supercomputers.

The first part of the calculations were carried out on Titan, a supercomputer based at the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility, a DOE Office of Science User Facility at DOE's Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, and the Blue Waters supercomputer at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Edwards said these first calculations were used to develop snapshots of the environment of subatomic particles, or the "vacuum" of space described by QCD.

"The vacuum is not an empty place, it's seething with energy," Edwards explains. "And energy is manifested as electric and magnetic fluctuations, which can be thought of as the glue of the strong force. So, what QCD does is look at the strength of these fields at every point in space."

These snapshots of the fluctuating vacuum can be imagined as the surface of a pond being rained on, with the raindrops causing ripples on the pond. Each snapshot of the surface of the pond corresponds to a snapshot of the vacuum. He said 485 snapshots were generated by the Titan supercomputer.

Watching the scenarios play out

For the second part of the calculations, quarks were added to the snapshot. As quarks move through the vacuum, they respond to their environment. Their possible movements, called "propagators," were computed using the Titan and Blue Waters supercomputers. For each snapshot of the vacuum, 800,000 such propagators were computed.

With the propagators in place, several different scenarios were then posed for how specific quarks will interact with each other as they propagate through time. For each scenario, the supercomputer calculates the probability within the theory of QCD that the quarks are likely to interact that certain way.

"We have to evaluate a quantity called a . The correlation function says that you have some configuration of quarks, and you're watching the propagation as they go through time," Edwards explains. "This correlation function is effectively measuring the correlation, or its strength, between its initial configuration of quarks and its final configuration of quarks."

Continuing our analogy of the raindrops on the pond, now imagine that a rubber duck has been added to the pond. The correlation function calculations determine how likely it is that the rubber duck will float from one point to another on the pond.

Each of the 485 configurations were simulated many times to determine the probability of each scenario, yielding about 15 million results for comparison. The calculations were carried out on Jefferson Lab's LQCD cluster in the spring and summer of 2016.

Sigma comes to life

After all of the calculations were tallied, the researchers found that if the right quarks are present, the sigma can, indeed, be generated by the strong force.

After decades of catching brief glimpses of the sigma's fleeting existence from the experimental data showing its effects on other , Dudek and Edwards say that this now gives scientists a new way to study this elusive particle.

"It's really a first step toward understanding what the sigma is. Does it really exist within the theory? Apparently, it does," Dudek explained.

The properties of the sigma in their calculations seem to match what scientists have come to expect of the real-world sigma's properties. What's more, now that these calculations have demonstrated that it's feasible to apply supercomputers to calculations of an elusive particle like the sigma, this may well open the door for calculations of other short-lived particles.

"We've demonstrated that we can show it exists within QCD. Now, the questions are: What is it? How is it formed? Why does this thing exist? Is there a way to understand it simply?" Dudek said. "Can we address those questions, now that we have a rigorous technique to study within QCD this object? And that's something for the future."

And studying the elusive may allow researchers their first glimpse at this facet of the strong force that exists only deep inside the heart of matter. It may offer them a chance to eavesdrop, if you will, on the force as it goes about its business of building up our universe.

Explore further: Model identifies a high degree of fluctuations in gluons as essential to explaining proton structure

More information: Raul A. Briceño et al. IsoscalarScattering and theMeson Resonance from QCD, Physical Review Letters (2017). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.022002

Related Stories

Quark matter's connection with the Higgs

August 27, 2012

(Phys.org)—You may think you've heard everything you need to know about the origin of mass. After all, scientists colliding protons at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Europe recently presented stunning evidence strongly ...

New method to better understand atomic nuclei

September 24, 2015

The precise structure of atomic nuclei is an old problem that has not been fully solved yet, and it also constitutes a current research focus in the field of natural sciences. Together with colleagues from Bonn University, ...

Supercomputers help physicists understand a force of nature

July 11, 2006

What if the tiniest components of matter were somehow different from the way they exist now, perhaps only slightly different or maybe a lot? What if they had been different from the moment the universe began in the big bang? ...

Recommended for you

Muons spin tales of undiscovered particles

April 20, 2018

Scientists at U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) national laboratories are collaborating to test a magnetic property of the muon. Their experiment could point to the existence of physics beyond our current understanding, including ...

Integrating optical components into existing chip designs

April 19, 2018

Two and a half years ago, a team of researchers led by groups at MIT, the University of California at Berkeley, and Boston University announced a milestone: the fabrication of a working microprocessor, built using only existing ...

7 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

EyeNStein
not rated yet Apr 05, 2017
So the sigma is a sort of composite boson to convey the mid range force between nucleons.
Which means it should have a Feynman diagram representation and according to QFT be a disturbance in the 'sigma field' that pervades all space.

I introduce this not to complicate QFT; but to suggest that all the individual particle fields of QFT are more likely to be manifestations of some underlying field theory. Just as Gell-Mann spotted the pattern of the zoo and 'invented' quarks to make sense of it.
EyeNStein
not rated yet Apr 05, 2017
My current pet theory is that the standard model is all derived from a fifth force of nature which is confined to the Planck length and confines energy, binding it into the particles, and defining the rules, of the standard model.

It certainly acts like a fifth force:-
Releasing its work energy when neutralised by anti-matter.
Allowing unstable high mass particles to decay by tunnelling to lower mass particles.
Its Planck scale energy is too high for us to release it by any tools we have (fortunately!)
It is already waiting there at the unification energy of the other four forces.
As forces arise out of symmetries, the symmetry between matter and antimatter is the obvious choice. (Which is broken as there is more matter than anti-matter in our particular universe)
entrance
not rated yet Apr 05, 2017
What happens, if there is absolutely no EM field?
EyeNStein
not rated yet Apr 05, 2017
@entrance
The EM field has a value of zero at that location. (or at least as close to zero as uncertainty permits)
entrance
not rated yet Apr 05, 2017
Does this mean, that there can't exist any atoms on such locations, because there exists no strong force?
EyeNStein
not rated yet Apr 05, 2017
There wouldn't be any matter as matter is generally full of EM and other fields.
(Plus the improbable virtual matter of QFT plus a few passing neutrinos and some dark matter etc.)
EyeNStein
not rated yet Apr 09, 2017
Its also interesting how the space and momentum FFT's of the uncertainty and wave function may compare to the finite impulse response (FIR) and FFT of a multi-dimensionally confined particle if we adjust confinement to make their periodicities match.
(Or this could be rubbish, the maths gave me a headache, but I compared the waves sinusoidal FFT pictures to FIR and thought "Hey, maybe wave particle duality".)

(Sorry couldn't find a useful web link: Most FIR's are assumed single dimensional plus time transforms.)

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.