Ninety percent of predatory fish gone from Caribbean coral reefs due to overfishing

March 1, 2017, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
An image of a Caribbean reef shark in the Bahama. Credit: Neil Hammerschlag

Researchers at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill have found that up to 90 percent of predatory fish are gone from Caribbean coral reefs, straining the ocean ecosystem and coastal economy. The good news? They identified reefs, known as supersites, which can support large numbers of predator fishes that if reintroduced, can help restore the environmental and economic setback inflicted by overfishing.

The work, led by former UNC-Chapel Hill graduate student Abel Valdivia working with John Bruno, a marine biologist at UNC College of Arts & Sciences, suggests that these supersites - reefs with many nooks and crannies on its surface that act as hiding places for prey (and attract predators) - should be prioritized for protection and could serve as regional models showcasing the value of biodiversity for tourism and other uses. Other features that make a supersite are amount of available food, size of reef and proximity to mangroves.

"On land, a supersite would be a national park like Yellowstone, which naturally supports an abundance of varied wildlife and has been protected by the federal government," said Bruno, whose work appears in the March 1 issue of Science Advances.

The team surveyed 39 reefs across the Bahamas, Cuba, Florida, Mexico and Belize, both inside and outside , to determine how much fish had been lost by comparing on pristine sites to fish biomass on a typical reef. They estimated the biomass in each location and found that 90 percent of were gone due to overfishing.

An illustration of the relative fish biomass on reefs varying in fishing intensity and natural capacity to support large predatory fishes. Credit: Adi Khen

What they didn't expect to find was a ray of hope—a small number of reef locations that if protected could substantially contribute to the recovery of predatory fish populations and help restore depleted species.

"Some features have a surprisingly large effect on how many predators a reef can support," said Courtney Ellen Cox, a coauthor and former UNC-Chapel Hill doctoral student now at the National Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C. For example, researchers believe that the Columbia Reef within the fisheries closures of Cozumel, Mexico, could support an average 10 times the current level of predatory fish if protected.

Not long ago, large fishes were plentiful on , but are now largely absent due to targeted fishing. Today, predators are larger and more abundant within the marine reserves than on unprotected, overfished reefs. But even some of the marine reserves have seen striking declines, largely due to lack of enforcement of fishing regulations.

The bottom line is protection of predatory fish is a win-win from both an environmental and an economical perspective, explained Bruno.

"A live shark is worth over a million dollars in tourism revenue over its lifespan because sharks live for decades and thousands of people will travel and dive just to see them up close," said Valdivia, now at the Center for Biological Diversity in Oakland, Calif. "There is a massive economic incentive to restore and protect sharks and other top predators on coral reefs."

Explore further: Isolated coral reefs far from human activity are not healthier

More information: "Predatory fish depletion and recovery potential on Caribbean reefs" Science Advances,

Related Stories

Fish lightly to keep snapper on the reef

January 12, 2017

Fishing is fundamentally altering the food chain in coral reefs and putting extra pressure on top-level predator fish, according to new research.

Recommended for you

Seismologists introduce new measure of earthquake ruptures

March 21, 2018

A team of seismologists has developed a new measurement of seismic energy release that can be applied to large earthquakes. Called the Radiated Energy Enhancement Factor (REEF), it provides a measure of earthquake rupture ...

Conservation costs can be higher than bargained for

March 21, 2018

Sweeping policies that reward people in environmentally sensitive areas for returning their farmlands to nature have been lauded as ecological triumphs. But a new Michigan State University study shows that over time some ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (2) Mar 01, 2017
That would seem to be a good thing. You would think the prey species would rebound in a dramatic fashion. This in turn would attract the prey species to rebound in kind. It is common in the natural world for prey and predator to rise and crash in numbers in dramatic fashion, so even though the cause is human, it should cause a dramatic rise in prey because they do not know the difference between a Natural rise or fall in predators from a Human caused rise or fall of said predators. After all, we are part of the natural world.
not rated yet Mar 02, 2017
Would it be safe to say 90% off all fish are gone?
5 / 5 (1) Mar 02, 2017
You would think the prey species would rebound in a dramatic fashion.

They cannot, they are also overfished.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.