Paradigm shift: 'We need to study lumps of bacteria'

March 23, 2016

New research from the University of Copenhagen reveals that bacteria which agglutinate before entering the body are far more resistant than single-celled bacteria. This may be the cause of chronic infections.

Since the discovery of bacteria researchers have primarily studied bacteria as organisms that enter the body individually and only then accumulate or agglutinate, creating what is known as . However, a new study conducted by researchers at the Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences at the University of Copenhagen, among others, indicates that this view of bacteria needs to be revised.

"Bacteria that enter the bloodstream as biofilm are stronger than bacteria that enter the body separately. This is something we have to pay far greater attention to in trying to prevent infections, for example in connection with operations," says Professor Thomas Bjarnsholt from the Costerton Biofilm Center at the University of Copenhagen. He is the senior researcher behind the study, which is about to be published in the acclaimed online journal mBio.

Biofilm may be the cause of chronic infections. The research team behind the study has examined bacterial environments containing both biofilm and single-celled bacteria.

Here the researchers have found a significantly different type of growth than previously seen. The biofilm takes the main part of the nourishment available and thus outmatches the single-celled bacteria. This makes biofilm the most important player. According to Thomas Bjarnsholt, this is something we need to pay attention, for example when performing operations.

"We have a lot of bacteria on and in our skin which are clustered as biofilm and potentially pathogenic if they enter the skin. In this way biofilm can penetrate or be pushed into the body when the surgeon cuts a hole in the skin containing the biofilm," says Thomas Bjarnsholt.

"Antibiotics are not designed to fight biofilm," says Postdoc Kasper Kragh, who is the main author of the research article. "Often antibiotics are not sufficient to fight . This may partly be because antibiotics are to a large extent designed to fight single-celled bacteria, not biofilm."

"We have to take a few steps backwards and, with an open mind, examine how bacteria cause infections and how we can fight them," he adds.

"Hopefully by learning how and when bacteria form biofilm we will be able to find a better way to prevent and treat ," concludes Kragh.

Explore further: Lyme disease 'Biofilm' eludes antibiotics: report

Related Stories

New technique could prevent dangerous biofilms on catheters

November 17, 2015

Biofilms frequently coat the surfaces of catheters, and of various medical implants and prostheses, where they can cause life-threatening infections. New research at the Sahlgrenska Academy show that coating implants with ...

Recommended for you

Pigeons better at multitasking than humans: study

September 26, 2017

Pigeons are capable of switching between two tasks as quickly as humans – and even more quickly in certain situations. These are the findings of biopsychologists who had performed the same behavioural experiments to test ...

Bacterial nanosized speargun works like a power drill

September 26, 2017

In order to get rid of unpleasant competitors, some bacteria use a nanosized speargun. Researchers at the University of Basel's Biozentrum have gained new insights into the construction, mode of action and recycling of this ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.