Fossils reveal humans were greater threat than climate change to Caribbean wildlife

October 19, 2015, University of Florida
Fossils in a flooded cave reveal the impact of human activities on biodiversity. A recent National Science Foundation grant will allow University of Florida researchers to excavate in more caves, including this one on Crooked Island in the Bahamas. Credit: University of Florida

Nearly 100 fossil species pulled from a flooded cave in the Bahamas reveal a true story of persistence against all odds—at least until the time humans stepped foot on the islands.

University of Florida researchers say the discovery, detailed in a study appearing in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, shows many activities pose a threat to the future of island biodiversity, with modern human-driven not necessarily the most alarming. A new $375,000 National Science Foundation grant will allow further exploration of caves on Caribbean islands beginning in December.

Thirty-nine of the species discussed in the new study no longer exist on Great Abaco Island in the Bahamas. Of those, 17 species of birds likely fell victim to changes in climate and rising sea levels around the end of the Ice Age, about 10,000 years ago. Twenty-two other species of reptiles, birds and mammals persisted through those dramatic environmental changes only to vanish when humans first arrived on the island 1,000 years ago.

Exploring why some species were more flexible than others in the face of climate and human-driven changes could alter the way we think about conservation and restoration of species today, when scientists fear activities like habitat alteration and the introduction of invasive species could pose the greatest risk to island species, said lead author Dave Steadman, ornithology curator at the Florida Museum of Natural History on the UF campus.

"What we see today is just a small snapshot of how species have existed for millions of years," Steadman said. "The species that existed on Abaco up until people arrived were survivors. They withstood a variety of , but some could not adapt quickly or drastically enough to what happened when people showed up.

"So, there must be different mechanisms driving these two types of extinctions. What is it about people that so many island species could not adapt to? That's what we want to find out."

Steadman and colleagues, including plant ecologist Janet Franklin with Arizona State University, will attempt to answer that question later this year when they return to the Bahamas to further exploration of caves on Caribbean islands and expand our picture of which species were lost when humans arrived versus those that survived even though their environment was not always stable.

For species that were lost at the end of the Ice Age, climate change, habitat change and rising seas, with resulting smaller islands, may have caused their populations to become too small to remain genetically viable, resulting in inbreeding, Steadman said. A January 2015 study co-authored by Steadman found the Caribbean's first humans depleted species as small as bats on Abaco. The new study shows several other species that endured until human arrival were lost to activities such as hunting and starting wildfires, he said.

Hayley Singleton, UF master's student and study co-author, said the new research shows how quickly humans can drastically alter habitats. Unlike during the Ice Age, modern climate change and other human-driven changes often go hand in hand, she said.

"When humans change habitats at a rate that local species cannot keep up with, that can very quickly result in the losses," Singleton said. "Likewise, even small climate changes can affect migration and significantly impact habitats. So, you can have the perfect storm where climate and human-driven changes are occurring at the same time, like we're seeing in places around the world today."

Future research will explore whether there are fundamental genetic differences between the Bahamian that persisted and those that were lost when humans arrived. In other words, scientists want to know if there's a genetic basis for adaptability, Steadman said.

"The answer could help us predict what animals will be affected most by a changing climate and humans," he said.

Explore further: Fossils link Caribbean bat extinction to humans, not climate change

More information: Vertebrate community on an ice-age Caribbean island, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1516490112

Related Stories

Reconstructing a vanished bird community from the Ice Age

September 9, 2015

Visit Peru's Talara Tar Seeps today and you'll see a desert, but 15,000 years ago, the area was grassland and forest, roamed by dire wolves and saber-toothed cats. If you had gone for a walk in the Talara during the last ...

Important study of how climate affects biodiversity

April 16, 2015

How does climate change affect the occurrence and distribution of species? This is a key question in the climate debate, and one that is hard to answer without information about natural variation in species abundance. Now ...

Recommended for you

Computing the origin of life

December 14, 2018

As a principal investigator in the NASA Ames Exobiology Branch, Andrew Pohorille is searching for the origin of life on Earth, yet you won't find him out in the field collecting samples or in a laboratory conducting experiments ...

7 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shootist
1.4 / 5 (11) Oct 20, 2015
It's wicked being the top predator.

In any case climate change is over blown hype and fraud.

To paraphrase Freeman Dyson, "The climate models are worse now than they were ten years ago, and they were rubbish then."
Ojorf
3.2 / 5 (11) Oct 20, 2015
It really is wicked, what you do on a daily basis.
MalleusConspiratori
5 / 5 (4) Oct 21, 2015
Daily? He jerks off on here on a minute by minute basis. Actually, it's a good illustration of the point behind the article. Humans are vermin. Read that in a comment and thought it was spot on. I'm starting to think that the school of thought that says that AGW is just one way humans are destroying the ecosystem is a better way of looking at it. In fact the emphasis on AGW is a symptom of the problem. That factor is a big deal for us, so we care about it. Others that impact ecosystems far more than us- for the moment- are still under the RADAR.

If AGW could be wiped away in a stroke, the ecosystems would still be under mortal threat. It's just that a few have finally gotten it through their heads in the case of AGW and that gives them a way to get traction on the issue. It's an illusion, though. It just the tip of the crappy iceberg that is the human presence.
AGreatWhopper
5 / 5 (3) Oct 21, 2015
Hence, his handle, "shootist". I guess "spoiler of towels" wouldn't fit.
gkam
2.3 / 5 (3) Oct 21, 2015
Humans a greater threat to other life than Climate? Well, we have it working with us, now.

Soon, even we will be gone.
gkam
3.4 / 5 (5) Oct 21, 2015
Shootist sqays: "
To paraphrase Freeman Dyson, "The climate models are worse now than they were ten years ago, and they were rubbish then.""
----------------------------------------

I do not care about models. How about Folsom Lake?

http://phys.org/n...firstCmt
antigoracle
1.8 / 5 (5) Oct 21, 2015
Humans a greater threat to other life than Climate? Well, we have it working with us, now.

Soon, even we will be gone.

Pathological Liars and hypocrites, like you, can't be gone soon enough.
If you weren't, you would have done yourself and the world a favour and off yourself a long time ago.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.