No single explanation for biodiversity in Madagascar

No single explanation for biodiversity in Madagascar
Over 90 percent of the more than 700 species of reptiles and amphibians that live in Madagascar -- like the jeweled chameleon (Furcifer campani) shown here -- occur nowhere else on Earth. A study of how Madagascar's unique biodiversity responded to environmental fluctuations in the past suggests that the climate change and deforestation that the island is experiencing today will have varying effects on different species. Credit: Jason L. Brown, City College of New York.

No single "one-size-fits-all" model can explain how biodiversity hotspots come to be, finds a study of more than 700 species of reptiles and amphibians on the African island of Madagascar.

By analyzing the geographic distribution of Madagascar's lizards, snakes, frogs and tortoises, an international team of researchers has found that each group responded differently to environmental fluctuations on the island over time.

The results are important because they suggest that and land use in Madagascar will have varying effects on different species, said Jason Brown of the City College of New York.

"It means that there won't be a uniform decline of species—some species will do better, and others will do worse," said Brown, a co-author on the study appearing online in the journal Nature Communications.

The study is part of a larger body of research aimed at identifying the climate, geology and other features of the environment that help bring new species of plants and animals into being in an area, and then sustain once they're there.

Located 300 miles off the southeast coast of Africa, the island of Madagascar is a treasure trove of unusual animals, about 90 percent of which are found nowhere else on Earth. Cut off from the African and Indian mainlands for more than 80 million years, the animals of Madagascar have evolved into a unique menagerie of creatures, including more than 700 species of reptiles and amphibians—snakes, geckos, iguanas, chameleons, skinks, frogs, turtles and tortoises.

Visitors to the island may come across neon green geckos that can grow up to a foot in length, and tiny tree frogs that secrete toxic chemicals from their skin and come in combinations of black and iridescent blue, orange, yellow and green. They'll also find about half of the world's chameleons—lizards famous for their bulging eyes, sticky high-speed tongues and ability to change color.

Researchers have long sought to understand how Madagascar—a country that makes up less than 0.5 percent of the Earth's land surface area—gave rise to so many unusual species.

Previous studies have linked the distribution of species to various factors, such as steep slopes that fuel diversity by creating a range of habitats in a small area. But few studies have integrated all of these variables into a single model to examine the relative influence of multiple factors at once, Brown said.

He and Duke University biologist Anne Yoder and colleagues developed a model that combines the modern distributions of 325 species of amphibians and 420 species of reptiles that live in Madagascar today with historical and present-day estimates of topography, rainfall and other variables across the island.

From steep tropical rainforests to flat, desert-like regions, the researchers analyzed three measures of biodiversity: the number of species, the proportion of unique species and the similarity of species composition from one site to another.

"Not surprisingly, we found that different groups of species have diversified for different reasons," Yoder said.

For example, changes in elevation—due to the mountains, rivers and other features that shape the land—best predicted which parts of the island had high proportions of unique tree frog species. But the biggest influence on why some areas had higher proportions of unique leaf chameleons was climate stability through time.

"What governs the distribution of, say, a particular group of frogs isn't the same as what governs the distribution of a particular group of snakes," Brown said. "A one-size-fits-all model doesn't exist."

Understanding how species distributions responded to environmental fluctuations in the past may help scientists predict which groups are most vulnerable to global warming and deforestation in the future, or which factors pose the biggest threat.

Other studies have found that some of Madagascar's reptiles and amphibians are already moving up to higher elevations due to climate change, and roughly 40 percent of the country's reptile species are threatened with extinction due to logging and farming in their forest habitats.

The difficulty of using this model to predict species' responses is that the environmental fluctuations the researchers examined occurred over tens of thousands of years, whereas the changes in climate and land use that Madagascar is currently experiencing are taking place over a matter of decades, said Brown, who was a postdoctoral research associate at Duke at the time of the research.

Making accurate predictions about the threat of future extinction requires determining the timescales at which current environmental changes pose a threat.

"One of the lessons learned is that when trying to assess the impacts of future climate change on distribution and survival, we have to deal in specifics rather than generalities, since each group of animals experiences its environment in a way that is unique to its life history and other biological characteristics," Yoder said.

Explore further

Research suggests Madagascar no longer an evolutionary hotspot

More information: "A necessarily complex model to explain the biogeography of the amphibians and reptiles of Madagascar," Brown, Jl, et al. Nature Communications, October 2014. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6046
Journal information: Nature Communications

Provided by Duke University
Citation: No single explanation for biodiversity in Madagascar (2014, October 10) retrieved 21 April 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Oct 11, 2014
We do know that biodiversity increases over time in stable environments. After a disturbance, we tend to see very few species, or monocultures develop quickly, then over time, new species invade and carve out a niche for themselves, one by one.

Perhaps Madascar has had relatively few catastrophic environmental changes over the last few millions of years, which explains the high degree of biodiversity.

Oct 12, 2014

Excerpt: A 'one-size-fits-all' model does not exist."


My comment: The model of nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled RNA-mediated biodiversity has existed since 1996. It has been used to explain all biodiversity in the context of systems biology and niche construction based on details of conserved molecular epigenetics:

"Small intranuclear proteins also participate in generating alternative splicing techniques of pre-mRNA and, by this mechanism, contribute to sexual differentiation in at least two species…"

There is no other way that cell type differentiation occurs in any cell of any species. However, even in unicellular organisms reproduction is nutrient-dependent, RNA-mediated (via amino acid substitutions), and biodiversity is pheromone-controlled.

See for examples: http://perfumingt...bmit.y=0

Oct 13, 2014
JVK go away

Oct 13, 2014
http://www.scienc...4003.htm "Molecular epigenetics. It is now understood that certain genes undergo a process called "genomic or parental imprinting." Early in embryonic development attached methyl groups become removed from most genes. Several days later, methyl groups are reattached in appropriate sites. Fascinatingly, some such genes reestablish methylation patterns based upon whether the chromosomal segment carrying the gene came from maternal or paternal chromosomes." These sexually dimorphic patterns..."

Oct 13, 2014
JVK go away
Let's try that again.

JVK go away

Oct 13, 2014
http://www.hawaii...ion.html Diamond, Binstock, and JVK (1996)

... and all other patterns of cell type differentiation in individuals of all species are not explained in any version of the pseudoscientific nonsense that has been touted by evolutionary theorists and evolutionary theists during the past 8 decades.

The only biologically plausible explanation is that nutrient-dependent RNA-directed DNA methylation links the epigenetic landscape to the physical landscape of DNA via RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions that differentiate cell types in the context of the pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction that enables fixation of amino acid substitutions that stabilize the organized genome during the ecological adaptations that must occur for biodiversity to arise.

Oct 13, 2014

Excerpt from my comment: "...each mention of the word 'mutation' appears to make evolutionary theorists and evolutionary theists think their claims are supported by serious scientists who understand the complexities of protein folding."

Oct 14, 2014
Not working. Maybe reordering will help.

Go away JVK

Oct 14, 2014
Does evolutionary theory need a rethink?

"SET explains such parallels as convergent evolution: similar environmental conditions select for random genetic variation with equivalent results. This account requires extraordinary coincidence to explain the multiple parallel forms that evolved independently..."

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more