Why parents help their children lie to Facebook about age

November 2, 2011 By Erin White

A major new nationwide study released today, co-authored by Eszter Hargittai, associate professor of communication studies at Northwestern University, shows that many parents know that their underage children are on Facebook in violation of the site’s restrictions.

Parents are often complicit in helping their join the site. These new data suggest that, by creating a context in which companies choose to restrict access to children, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), which is currently under review, inadvertently undermines parents’ ability to make choices and protect their children’s data.

This study has significant implications for policy makers, particularly in light of the discussion in Congress and at the Federal Trade Commission about COPPA and other age-based privacy laws. Based on a national sample of 1,007 U.S. parents who have children living with them between the ages of 10-14, this survey conducted July 5-14, 2011 found:

• 12 is the mean age at which parents of current 13-and 14-year-olds reported that their child joined Facebook; Facebook’s minimum age is 13.

• 36% of all parents surveyed knew that their child joined Facebook before the age of 13; 68% of these parents helped their child create their account.

• 55% of parents of 12-year-olds report their child has a Facebook account; 82% of these parents knew when their underage child signed up and 76% assisted in creating the account.

• 53% of parents think Facebook has a minimum age; 35% of these parents think that it is a recommendation and not a requirement.

• 78% of parents reported various reasons that make it acceptable for their child to violate minimum age restrictions on online services.

The authors argue that these data call into question the efficacy of COPPA. Their findings have important implications for COPPA reform and other age-based legislation, such as the “Do Not Track Kids Act” currently being discussed in Congress:

• COPPA is well intended but has major unintended consequences in terms of encouraging general-purpose websites like , Skype, and Gmail to limit kids under 13 from accessing educational and social opportunities.

• Age-based restrictions imposed in response to COPPA undermine parental authority and limit parents’ freedoms to make choices about what their children do and what information is collected about them.

• As a result of COPPA, lying about one’s age has become normal and parents often help children lie. This creates safety and privacy issues.

• Online safety and privacy are of great concern to parents, but most parents do not want solutions that result in age-based restrictions for their children.

are open to recommended age ratings and other approaches that offer guidance without limiting their children’s access.

Explore further: Gun safety not part of many parents' conversations with kids

More information: The full survey results and policy implications may be found online at: www.firstmonday.org/

Related Stories

Eyes are windows to more than a child's soul

September 1, 2011

Nearly 80 percent of what children learn during their first 12 years is through their vision. Though vision problems may seem easy to identify, they actually can be difficult for parents to discern. Still, parents need to ...

Australia mulls Facebook 18+

July 21, 2011

Australia on Thursday said it was considering upping the restrictions placed on Facebook, giving parents access to their children's pages and requiring proof of age at sign-up.

Recommended for you

Volvo to supply Uber with self-driving cars (Update)

November 20, 2017

Swedish carmaker Volvo Cars said Monday it has signed an agreement to supply "tens of thousands" of self-driving cars to Uber, as the ride-sharing company battles a number of different controversies.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Nov 02, 2011
"Online safety and privacy are of great concern to parents, but most parents do not want solutions that result in age-based restrictions for their children."

I would challenge this statement. It would be more accurate to say "most people like the concept" of online safety for their children. Yet, most people are not willing to do anything at all to help achieve this goal.

Protecting one's privacy online is still in its infancy. The various technologies are cumbersome, challenging to use for the average mom or dad, and mostly require using a variety of tools to achieve complete "coverage".

That said, it is doable. I find it laughable when people who lie about their children's age so they can get a Facebook account then turn around and complain about the lack of protection for their children.

It's a classic example of the adults abdicating their responsibility to their children.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.