Gasoline from water, CO2 and sunlight

The new generation of solar fuels
Doctoral student Philipp Furler and Professor Aldo Steinfeld during the experimental investigation of the solar thermochemical reactor under (simulated) concentrated solar radiation. Credit: P. Rüegg / ETH Zurich

A research team from ETH Zurich, PSI, and Caltech demonstrates the stable, efficient and rapid generation of solar fuels. They apply a thermochemical cycle based on ceria redox reactions to thermochemically split water and CO2 using a novel solar cavity-receiver reactor under concentrated solar radiation. Their remarkable findings are reported in the latest issue of Science.

Scientists ask themselves: how can we get hold of the vast, yet intermittent and unevenly distributed, resource such that it can be stored and transported from the sunny and uninhabited regions of the earth’s sunbelt to the world’s industrialized and populated centers, where much of the energy is required? This question has motivated the search for recipes to transform sunlight into chemical energy carriers in the form of storable and dispatchable liquid fuels, such as gasoline and jet fuel, usable to propel not only our cars, airplanes and ships, but the entire world economy.

New recipe and cooking pot

A research team around Aldo Steinfeld, Professor of Mechanical and Process Engineering at ETH Zurich and Head of the Solar Technology Laboratory at PSI, in collaboration with the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena, USA, has recently developed a promising recipe and associated reactor technology. Their idea is based on a solar-driven thermochemical cycle for splitting CO2 and H2O using metal oxide redox reactions. The 2-step cycle consists in thermally reducing non-stoichiometric cerium oxide at above 1,500 °C and re-oxidizing it with H2O and CO2 at below 900 °C to produce H2 and CO – known as syngas, the precursor of liquid hydrocarbon fuels. “The operation at high temperatures and the utilization of the entire solar spectrum provide a thermodynamically attractive path to solar fuel production at high kinetic rates and energy conversion efficiencies”, says Steinfeld.

The solar reactor for performing this cycle is schematically shown in the adjacent figure. It consists of a cavity-receiver with a small windowed aperture for the access of concentrated . The selected dimensions ensure multiple internal reflections and efficient capture of incoming solar energy. A porous, monolithic ceria cylinder is placed inside the cavity and subjected to multiple heat-cool cycles under appropriate gases to induce fuel production.

Efficient heat transfer

With this arrangement, the porous ceria cylinder is directly exposed to concentrated solar radiation impinging on its inner walls, providing efficient radiative heat transfer directly to the reaction site. Reacting gases flow radially across the porous ceria cylinder, while product gases exit the cavity through an axial outlet port. Experimentation was carried out at PSI’s High-Flux Solar Simulator with a 2000 W solar reactor prototype subjected to solar concentration ratios exceeding 1,500 suns. The measured solar-to-fuel energy conversion efficiency, defined as the heating value of the fuel produced divided by the solar radiative power input, reached 0.8 %.

“This efficiency value is about two orders of magnitude greater than the one observed with state-of-the-art photocatalytic approaches for CO2 dissociation”, says Philipp Furler, doctoral student in Steinfeld’s group, who is currently working on the reactor optimization with help of fluid mechanics and heat transfer simulation models. Thermodynamic analyses show that efficiencies above 15% are attainable.

500 cycles without interruption

Beyond efficiency, material stability is an crucial criterion for a viable thermochemical process. Using the differential reactor system, 500 cycles of water dissociation were performed without interruption, yielding stable fuel production at constant rates.

The new generation of solar fuels
Schematic of the solar reactor configuration for the 2-step solar-driven thermochemical production of fuels. It consists of a cavity-receiver containing a porous monolithic ceria cylinder. Concentrated solar radiation enters through a windowed aperture and impinges on the ceria inner walls. Reacting gases flow radially across the porous ceria, while product gases exit the cavity through an axial outlet port. Red arrow indicates ceria reduction (oxygen evolution); blue arrow indicates oxidation (fuel production). Credit: Schema: A. Steinfeld / ETH Zurich

Essential to the successful solar fuel demonstration is a simple and scalable solar reactor design using porous ceria that enables high-temperature heat transfer to the reaction sites under realistic operating conditions relevant to large-scale solar concentrating systems. In the meantime, Steinfeld and his team are currently focusing on optimizing the solar reactor technology with the aim of scaling it up for megawatt solar towers, such as those already applied commercially for electricity generation.

When asked about the timetable towards industrial implementation, he is cautious and rather conservative: “The potential of solar fuels has been repeatedly overestimated in the short term and underestimated in the long term. We still have plenty of R&D work to accomplish, but by 2020 we should be able to witness the first industrial solar fuel plants coming into operation”. He confidently adds: “The results to date provide compelling evidence for the technical viability of thermochemical approaches to solar fuel generation from water and CO2, while clarifying the efforts required to transform the laboratory concept into a central technology for a sustainable energy future”.

Explore further

Solar energy stored efficiently

More information: Chueh WC, et al. High-Flux Solar-Driven Thermochemical Dissociation of CO2 and H2O using Nonstoichiometric Ceria. Science, 24 December 2010: Vol. 330 no. 6012 pp. 1797-1801. DOI:10.1126/science.1197834
Provided by ETH Zurich
Citation: Gasoline from water, CO2 and sunlight (2011, January 4) retrieved 19 August 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jan 04, 2011
Thermodynamic analyses show that efficiencies above 15% are attainable.


So we make fuel from solar, allegedly at 15% efficiency, then transport it across a continent in a 15% efficient ICE tanker truck...

This will require so...many...acres...

Moveover, because the efficiency of an ICE is lwoer than an electric engine, it would seem this would make much less total power available as compared to arrays of solar panels.

We now have people making supposedly 40% efficient solar panels, and electric motors at like 60% efficient.

Compare to alleged 15% effecient for this system, and then 15% to 30% efficient engine to burn the fuel later.

0.4*0.6 = 0.24 efficiency of solar electric system


0.15*0.15 = 0.025 efficiency for solar gasoline system

24% efficiency for an infrastructure is a lot better than 2.5% efficiency for an infrastructure.

Jan 04, 2011
How about > 90 + efficiency.

search for colossalstorage/API

No catalyst, no electrodes, no chemicals and
100 % green clean renewable energy.

Jan 04, 2011
How abot some proof-of-concept from colossalstorage/API?

Or even a description of the concept...I do see a request for $$$ there though...that's a good concept you have there, holoman.

Jan 04, 2011

24% efficiency for an infrastructure is a lot better than 2.5% efficiency for an infrastructure.

I agree.....very early days though :)

Jan 04, 2011
I will agree too that 24% efficiency for solar to electric beats 2.5% solar to gas, but as a solution for transitioning off fossil fuels or for use where fossil are the only solution, this could work.

Jan 04, 2011
24% efficiency for an infrastructure is a lot better than 2.5% efficiency for an infrastructure.

You forgot to factor in the losses involved with charging and discharging of batteries.

Also, distributing liquid fuels across the country by tanker truck is a stupid notion. It's what pipelines were invented for, a century ago.

Also, if instead of gasoline they use the syngas to synthesize methanol, then it could be fed through a direct methanol fuel cell stack (whose efficiency far exceeds that of the ICE.)

Lastly, it MIGHT be possible *eventually* for battery-stored energy densities to approach those of even the least-dense liquid fuels (such as methanol.) But in the foreseeable future, liquid fuels give you a much better bang for the buck, the mass, the volume, and the time to fill-up.

Jan 05, 2011
Eric B.

I understand modeling and simulation proof are
done and only showing proof to unique companies
that are under strict NDA guide lines.

Hopefully one of them is from USA.

Jan 09, 2011
I will agree too that 24% efficiency for solar to electric beats 2.5% solar to gas, but as a solution for transitioning off fossil fuels or for use where fossil are the only solution, this could work.

Howhot has the right idea. Solar fuel could replace many gross polluter diesel locomotives and trucks, including jet engines. Electric jets would be so cool. I do not see individual vehicles being greatly affected by this tech because it would be too expensive. H2O power on demand would be the ultimate solution for individuals.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more