Satellite data reduce invasion of alien species

December 20, 2010, European Space Agency
The North Sea areas at risk of alien species intrusion should water ballast from ships be exchanged. Using ESA Earth observation data, the model was developed as part of the Agency's Data User Element Innovators II project. Credits: ESA/Brockmann Consult

( -- Every day, thousands of different organisms are carried far from their natural habitat in water used as ship ballast. To reduce the transfer of invasive aquatic species between ecosystems, satellites are being used to assess areas at risk from ballast water exchange.

While and have always clung to the outside of ships' hulls, the problem of marine has dramatically increased since the widespread introduction of water-tight hulls in the 19th century.
It is estimated that around five billion tonnes of water, carrying a multitude of micro-organisms, eggs, and larger organisms, are now transported annually as ballast.

The intrusion of harmful aquatic species and through ballast water ranks one of the highest risks to the marine environment, especially in .

Responding to this issue, the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) formulated the ‘International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships' Ballast Water and Sediments’ to prevent the potentially devastating effects. The convention, currently being ratified, is expected to take effect in 2013.

To support Germany's Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (BSH), which is responsible for ballast water management in German waters, ESA is providing data for a case study to estimate the risk to the environmental from ballast water.

ESA's Data User Element Innovators II Ballast Water project supports BSH and the decision processes involved for ballast-water management in the North Sea and Baltic Sea prior to the ratification of the IMO convention.

The project includes the provision of two types of products: the Ballast Water Risk Index and the Average Risk Index.

Chlorophyll concentration in the North Sea and Baltic Sea derived from the MERIS instrument on Envisat. These data are used as input to calculate the risk to the environment from ships exchanging their ballast water. Credits: ESA/Brockmann Consult

'Risk' means the chances of survival for an alien species released into the sea from ballast water. A model to calculate the risk was developed in close cooperation with BSH following recommendations from the IMO.

The risk indexes are calculated from a number of different marine data, such as sea-surface temperature, ocean colour and water transparency, acquired largely by ESA's Envisat mission.

The ocean colour products, provided by the optical MERIS sensor, for example, are used for the assessment of algae. It is assumed that areas with high chlorophyll concentrations provide a good food supply for introduced species, while in clearer waters the survival of a species is less likely.

Thermal-infrared scanners also provide data on sea-surface temperature to assess the similarities between source and destination habitats.

These data are proving an invaluable source for mapping regions where ships should or should not exchange their water ballast. It is proposed that a dedicated website integrates these data into a water quality service system to provide near-realtime information on the degree of risk to the marine environment.

The Interreg North Sea Ballast Opportunity Project is also using the results in their discussions on future strategies for water ballast.

Kai Trümpler, from BSH and the Interreg project said, "ESA is providing the basis for international discussion in the North Sea region for finding exemption zones. They will be of immediate practical value and have an impact on ballast water management regulations in this area.”

A workshop will be held on 25 January in Hamburg, Germany, where decision-makers and shipping companies will meet to discuss the aim of expanding the tool for use throughout Europe and possibly North America.

Explore further: Microbial stowaways: Are ships spreading disease?

Related Stories

Microbial stowaways: Are ships spreading disease?

May 29, 2008

Ships are inadvertently carrying trillions of stowaways in the water held in their ballast tanks. When the water is pumped out, invasive species could be released into new environments. Disease-causing microbes could also ...

Great Lakes invasive species studied

May 23, 2006

The longstanding problem of various invasive species entering the Great Lakes via the St. Lawrence Seaway is now gaining attention from scientists.

New, bigger barnacle discovered on Florida’s east coast

October 25, 2006

A bigger barnacle than Florida has seen before has made its way to the state’s east coast. Experts aren’t sure what the oversized Megabalanus coccopoma’s impact will be, but it’s been spotted this month in St. Augustine ...

Shrimp species latest Great Lakes invader

December 25, 2006

An invader shrimp, hopping a ride on an overseas freighter, has entered the Great Lakes, fulfilling an 8-year-old prediction by Canadian researchers.

Recommended for you

Rainfall's natural variation hides climate change signal

February 22, 2018

New research from The Australian National University (ANU) and ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science suggests natural rainfall variation is so great that it could take a human lifetime for significant climate ...

Seasonal patterns in the Amazon explained

February 22, 2018

Environmental scientists at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Brookhaven National Laboratory have led an international collaboration to improve satellite observations of tropical forests.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Dec 21, 2010
Given the enormous costs involved AFTER introduction of an Aggressive/Invasive Species; the costs of 'Pasteurization/irradiation/sterilization' of ALL Ballast fluids is a minute expense!

Roy J Stewart,
Phoenix AZ
1 / 5 (1) Dec 21, 2010
the wording of the actual agreement is quite reasonable.


There is a heavy focus on microbial species like E-coli and cholerae which is a good thing. In places like Charleston SC, where the major port of Charleston has major recreational beaches surrounding the port, this can be nothing but a good thing.

The gist of the agreement is that ships are supposed to exchange and dump ballast at least 200 nautical miles from land, have a written plan, and keep a log. That is reasonable.

lol, I can see why someone from AZ would be worried though. :)

I would guess that many ports already have some kind of requirements. This is most likely more of an effort to standardize the requirements and ease the burden on ship owners. It's gotta be easier if it's the same standard at most ports. Still, I wonder how much effort goes into enforcing this kind of stuff.
1 / 5 (1) Dec 21, 2010
This sounds like one of those things like the BP oil rig inspections. There's a law on the books, and standards in place. There isn't enough manpower time and money to fully enforce it, so it's mostly ignored until there's some huge disaster.

If you took your family to the beach and you all got sick the next day, but nobody goes to the hospital, would you suspect that you contracted E-coli from the ballast of a passing tanker, or would you suspect your tuna salad?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.