Intel's Light Peak Will Replace Copper Wires

Sep 24, 2009 by John Messina weblog
Light Peak module with 4 fibers. Each fiber capable of carrying data at 10 gigabits per second. Credit: Intel

(PhysOrg.com) -- At the Intel Developer Forum in San Francisco Wednesday, the company announced a new optical cable that will be able to transfer data, between electrical devices, starting at speeds of 10 gigabits per second.

Vice president, Dadi Perlmutter, of Intel's Mobility Group, hopes to ship an optical , called Light Peak, by 2010. Light Peak will first be introduced into the market as being able to transfer data at 10 gigabits per second. Future versions will be able to transfer data at 40 and 100 gigabits per second as the manufacturing process becomes cheaper.

A single Light Peak cable will be capable of transporting multiple types of data simultaneously such as transferring data to a hard drive, connecting to the internet and transferring video.

Each end of the Light Peak cable will be connected to chips that contain light producing devices, encode data, and transmit data. The chips will also amplify data and convert the light to electrical signals.

Researchers are hopeful that silicon photonics will eventually replace copper wires on motherboards and microprocessors by making high-bandwidth connectors cheaper.

The first generation of Light Peak cables will use the same type of optical chips used in telecommunication devices today. Intel will be able to drive down the cost of these chips because the manufacturing standards are less stringent.

The lasers and detectors inside the chips are not required to be high performing. The chips don't need to transmit data over great distances as required in the telecommunication industry.

Intel is currently working with other companies to form partnerships. Sony is supportive of Intel's Light Peak technology, with more announcements coming.

Additional information can be found at Intel's Tech Research

Via: Technology Review

© 2009 PhysOrg.com

Explore further: BMW to reveal driverless innovations that allow for 360- degree collision avoidance and valet parking

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Optical Broadband Data Transmission in the Home

Mar 27, 2007

Siemens and Infineon have developed a simple broadband transmission system for use in home networks. The system uses optical polymer cables that can be laid and installed without requiring any special skills. ...

Intel, UCSB Develop World's First Hybrid Silicon Laser

Sep 18, 2006

Researchers from Intel and the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) have built the world’s first electrically powered Hybrid Silicon Laser using standard silicon manufacturing processes. This breakthrough ...

Recommended for you

Cheaper, more powerful VR system for engineers

Dec 17, 2014

It's like a scene from a gamer's wildest dreams: 12 high-definition, 55-inch 3D televisions all connected to a computer capable of supporting high-end, graphics-intensive gaming.

Nokia HERE prepares maps for autonomous cars

Dec 17, 2014

Autonomous cars will need a new kind of map, a crucial element that until now has been given a back seat to the more popularly discussed issues of sensors and legal questions. Senior Writer Greg Miller in ...

Dutch launch 'intelligent bicycle' that warns of danger

Dec 15, 2014

The Netherlands on Monday launched its first-ever "intelligent bicycle", fitted with an array of electronic devices to help bring down the high accident rate among elderly cyclists in the bicycle-mad country.

User comments : 17

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

h20dr
not rated yet Sep 24, 2009
This is not new technology; just an application on a smaller scale but it will have huge implications for personal communication devices as miniaturization of electronics continues to scale down towards the nano level.
El_Nose
4 / 5 (1) Sep 24, 2009
May not be new - per se but this is something intel has been researching for like 7 years. This FINALLY coming to a mobo near you means removing a rather insignificant bottle neck on PC's but a larger one on the huge corp servers. If these can be used in conjunction with gigabitwifi and sharing of memory across boxes and cpu's may be a great boon to parallel computing
E_L_Earnhardt
5 / 5 (1) Sep 24, 2009
Current power transfer is by electron. Insert one into the orbit of an atom and one drops out of the orbit of another miles away. Photons may be faster,
but "fade" is a long-distance limiting problem. We lose a lot of light between here and the sun!
Bob_Kob
5 / 5 (1) Sep 25, 2009
Does a harddrive even have the capacity to read or write at 10 gigabits per second?
Roj
5 / 5 (1) Sep 25, 2009
capable of transporting multiple types of data.. such as transferring data to a hard drive..


If these devices are still booting from hard drives, rather than solid state memory, its a Marketing Gimmick.

Unless of course there's a window carved out of the tower so we can watch the blinking lights.
guiding_light
5 / 5 (1) Sep 25, 2009
I have a couple doubts about this otherwise hopeful technology.

First is the power consumption of the light sources (they can't be that efficient). Second 3D interconnects make more sense (less distance to travel, less power) and save space.
plasma_guy
5 / 5 (1) Sep 25, 2009
It looks like a step in the wrong direction, being more wiring, albeit different type. I don't see this working well among motherboards for personal devices, maybe server arrays.
lengould100
3 / 5 (2) Sep 25, 2009
This is cute, but not going to change anything for personal users. short-distance links are alredy faster than anyone uses, its those plodding unreliable "last mile" links which need fixing.
Anyone
1 / 5 (2) Sep 25, 2009
Re: "fade", E_L_Earnhardt -- not at all the same kind of thing; not at all the same distance; not the same wavelength; the only common factor between the two is photons. try Google, polymer optic fiber.

Re: hard drive I/O, Bob Kob -- not to my knowledge, for magneto-mechanical types. as was mentioned, probably use SSDs.

Re: power consumption, 'guiding light' -- yes, they can, especially at short distance. try Google -- VCSELs, also LEDs. Intel likely will use VCSELs.

Re: 'wrong direction', 'plasma guy' -- no technical reason to doubt it, if Intel can reduce manufacturing and assembly cost. One big issue is alignment of emitter with fiber. One way to mitigate that is with large core polymer fiber.

Re: 'last mile link', lengould100 -- agreed, there must be sufficient demand, sufficiently large end-use need to justify this kind of upgrade. it's not clear to me what that demand or end-use will be, aside from switch rooms and back-office for now.

p.s. -- I don't work for Intel
guiding_light
5 / 5 (1) Sep 25, 2009
Anyone, if you're trying to take the signal over a long distance (like meters) optical is indeed compelling, but I cannot agree for chip-scale you want to add an electrical-to-optical conversion unit. Not if I can use an equally wide (multi-micron scale) copper via.
Husky
not rated yet Sep 26, 2009
How about linking 32GPU's spread over several pc's with your optical cable in a virtual crossfire setup, finally getting a decent framerate in farcry2 or realtime raytracing in ultra HD ?

Or,

A huge Raid on wich you store a 1000 virtual machines and a pagefile to swap them in and out of your memory for a few milliseconds, so it looks as if you got them running local all at once on just a server with 1 board and 4 gig mem, wich shouldn't normally be possible. This could shift the cost from buying more rackservers AND userspace/ storage to just 1 or 2 fast servers and userspace

Bob_Kob
not rated yet Sep 26, 2009
I thought that this would have been common practice on servers and the like, and that this tech was specifically for user end applications now.
Arikin
5 / 5 (2) Sep 28, 2009
El_Nose, fiber-optic connections between servers is being done now. Right now they use it between the servers and say a disk array. Sun is doing it and some others.

This is a nice idea. But they moved the bottle neck from the motherboard to the devices again. Until the encoding and decoding is removed and the light is used by the devices directly then your faster speed isn't going to be realized.

There are already boards out there that can match or beat the devices input/output speeds. So no real advantage with this setup.
Anyone
5 / 5 (1) Sep 28, 2009
Re: distance, 'guiding light' -- VIAs, and the like, are part of the problem with copper interconnect at chip-scale. people are talking about 40 - 100Gbps now (802.3ba); no clear indication when there will be a market. people need to decide when the cost of fine-tuning copper interconnect and use of exotic dielectric material will meet or exceed the cost of optics, then choose.

Re: bottleneck, Arikin -- correct. I bet it's legacy issues with the (now) older copper interconnect (e.g. - baseline wander and jitter). perhaps this would be an avoidable problem if there weren't a need for backwards-compatability.
otto1923
5 / 5 (1) Sep 28, 2009
Does a harddrive even have the capacity to read or write at 10 gigabits per second?
Mechanical rotating or switching parts and pieces are dead end tech. The goal would be completely solid state, multi-layered, nano-engineered and assembled, 3D interconnected, flexible, disposable card pda phones, folios, screens, and bricks. No movable, fixable, or replacable parts.
freelanc3r
not rated yet Sep 30, 2009
Forgive my ignorance on some of the more technical aspects involved in this, but if one were to replace the copperwiring found on most consumer motherboards with polymer optic fiber wouldn't that also cut down on a lot of heat generated by the computer? If not a lot, at least quite a bit as well as prep the standard PC for the next round of upgrades for performance and speed by allowing faster interfaces with each of the components?
guiding_light
not rated yet Oct 01, 2009
Well no one is going to argue the worsening problems of staying with copper. The trouble with optics is you can't make it smaller than micron scale. To collect data from the hundreds of transistors within the area occupied by the optical element, you still need individual copper wires, which overwhelm the benefit offered by the optical part. For scales of mm, cm upward, you have to consider the signal integrity and power of the light source over such scales. So, in short, there is still going to be an incompatibility of scales between chips and cables.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.