Advanced car battery makers seek juice from stimulus plan

Jan 18, 2009 By Robert S. Boyd

The U.S. is struggling to catch up with China, Japan and Korea in a race to build the advanced batteries needed to power the electric cars of the future.

The latest setback came last week, when General Motors picked a Korean company over an American rival to build lithium ion batteries for GM's Chevy Volt, which is due on the market late next year.

Lithium ion is the current hot technology to replace the familiar lead-acid batteries used in most cars today, and the newer nickel-metal hydride batteries in hybrid electric vehicles, such as Toyota's popular Prius.

The National Alliance for Advanced Transportation Battery Cell Manufacture intends to ask the U.S. government for as much as $2 billion in grants and loans during the next five years to jump-start the American lithium ion industry, while creating thousands of jobs in the process.

The alliance, a group of 14 U.S. battery manufacturers that was formed in December, hopes it will be funded as part of the stimulus package proposed by Congress and the incoming Obama administration. Electric cars reduce the demand for oil and contribute less to global warming.

Lithium ion is an extremely light metal atom that's lost or gained an electron and can be used to produce an electric current. Small lithium ion batteries are widely used in cell phones, power tools and laptop computers, but aren't yet ready for mass use in cars.

The battery gap has major implications for the health of the U.S. auto industry and, more broadly, for U.S. competitiveness in the world.

"For 20 years, the United States has sat idly and waited for foreign markets to become the leaders in lithium ion technology," said Alan Eishafei, chief executive of MicroSun Technologies of Lisle, Ill.

Experts say a moderately priced battery with enough power and endurance may be the key to survival as the industry attempts the difficult transition from gasoline engines to an electric future.

"Whoever makes the batteries will one day make the cars," said James Greenberger, an attorney for the battery alliance. "If we don't secure a supply, we'll be at the mercy of foreign suppliers - not just for the battery but for everything else that goes into a car."

Asian firms, backed by heavy government subsidies, currently dominate the growing advanced battery market. The U.S. has no large-scale domestic manufacturer, and must import almost all the lithium ion "cells" that make up the battery, said Greenberger, a lawyer with Reed Smith LLP in Chicago.

"Electric engines will help break our reliance on petroleum," Greenberger said. "They are cleaner and much more efficient than the internal combustion engine."

A123 Systems of Watertown, Mass., the company that lost the Chevy Volt contract, had recently applied for a $1.84 billion loan from the Energy Department to open a large battery assembly plant in the Detroit area.

GM announced on Jan. 12, however, that it would buy lithium ion cells from LG Chem of Seoul, South Korea. The cells will be manufactured in Korea and assembled into battery packs at a new facility that GM will build in Michigan. Robert Lutz, a GM vice chairman, said that his company preferred the Korean design.

"LG Chem has massive support from the Korean government," Lutz said at the Detroit Auto Show. "Korea recognizes that advanced battery technology is a key component of the country's competitiveness."

American lithium ion backers acknowledge that their batteries face a number of problems before they can be widely used in cars and trucks. They include cost, endurance and the need for a nationwide infrastructure of recharging stations.

The Energy Department has set a target price of $1,700 to $3,400 for an all-electric car battery that could go 40 miles on a full charge.

The lithium ion battery in the Chevy Volt is believed to cost significantly more than that, but the price should go down as more vehicles are sold. GM said the first Volts are expected to sell for about $35,000.

Theoretically, lithium ion batteries could be recharged in a home or office garage. Public charging stations can be set up in parking lots and shopping malls. Stations are currently being installed in Portland, Ore.; Boulder, Colo.; and San Jose, Calif.

"This offers new business opportunities - charging stations at Starbucks or Wal-Mart," said Michael Brylawski, a vehicle efficiency expert at the Rocky Mountain Institute, an environmental policy organization in Snowmass, Colo.

Brylawski acknowledged that it's easy to install a few dozen recharging stations, but hundreds of thousands eventually will be required. "That's very different than (what) we have now," he said.

___

© 2009, McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
Visit the McClatchy Washington Bureau on the World Wide Web at www.mcclatchydc.com

Explore further: Wireless sensor transmits tumor pressure

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Wireless sensor transmits tumor pressure

Sep 20, 2014

The interstitial pressure inside a tumor is often remarkably high compared to normal tissues and is thought to impede the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents as well as decrease the effectiveness of radiation ...

Seeing through the fog (and dust and snow) of war

Sep 19, 2014

Degraded visibility—which encompasses diverse environmental conditions including severe weather, dust kicked up during takeoff and landing and poor visual contrast among different parts of terrain—often ...

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

John_balls
not rated yet Jan 18, 2009
Surprise , surprise.. Gm is outsourcing.
javjav
not rated yet Jan 18, 2009
Batteries can not win a price war against gasoline. If a significative percentage of cars start using batteries, then the gasoline prices will go down and many drivers will prefer gas. Gas is everywhere, you only need to get it from the floor and transport it, and even the gasoline transport is more efficient than it is for heavy batteries.
Paradox
5 / 5 (1) Jan 19, 2009
"Batteries can not win a price war against gasoline. Gas is everywhere."

I don't know about you, but I have electricity at my house. Pretty much uh, everywhere. Transportation isn't even required.
Soylent
3 / 5 (2) Jan 19, 2009
Batteries can not win a price war against gasoline.


I'm not so sure about that. Gasoline is already one of the most expensive forms of energy even before you include the hefty external costs.

If a significative percentage of cars start using batteries, then the gasoline prices will go down and many drivers will prefer gas.


That's perfectly fine. We don't need electric vehicles tomorrow; the only important requirement is to be able to produce electric vehicles fast enough to offset the decline in oil production past peak.
Soylent
3 / 5 (2) Jan 19, 2009
I don't know about you, but I have electricity at my house. Pretty much uh, everywhere. Transportation isn't even required.


I don't know about you but I like having a job and food and stuff. The unnecessary part is single occupant commuter vehicles going 50 miles to the exurbs each day.
javjav
not rated yet Jan 19, 2009
Sorry, but I do not agree with any of you. Both electricity and batteries are not primary energy sources as petroleum is. Batteries can only store energy, and electricity is just a way to transport energy, none of them are energy sources. Batteries still need a cheap method to create primary energy in order to succeed. Without it, it does not make sense to remove gasoline from the car, just to put a heavier battery that was charged with electricity that was created by burning gas!. Just put the gas directly into the car and avoid all this energy-waste conversions.
And the other problem I see is (as I said): as soon as you start using other primary energies to compete with gas you will force the gas prices to go down (The OPEP is still selling it with huge comercial margins), and then the gas will be even more competitive (please do not misunderstand me, I do not like gas, but I do not believe in magical solutions). What we need is a new primary energy that could be cheaper than gas. And at this moment, I am afraid that only the nuclear energy can be cheaper, cleaner, and even less dangerous than gas (in all the history, the petroleum chain has killed more people than nuclear accidents by a factor of thousands...) , but most consumers are too ignorant to accept this fact, and most politicians are too coward to tell it to them.
Wha_wha_what
not rated yet Feb 01, 2009
I don't know where you live, but only about 1% of the electricity in the USA is produced by burning gas. Not to mention most EV's are charged at night when many utility companies charge reduced rates.

The cost per mile to drive an electric car is far lower than a gasoline engine, the only stumbling block is the initial cost to either convert or buy a new electric vehicle.

Today's electric cars are still in their infancy and new battery technologies will come along to improve range every couple years. The new lithium ion batteries this article is talking about are a perfect example, when was the last time someone discovered a new way to double gasoline car effectiveness the way the new lithium batteries do for electric vehicles?