Statistician helps resolve dispute about how gene expression is controlled

March 20, 2015
genes
This image shows the coding region in a segment of eukaryotic DNA. Credit: National Human Genome Research Institute

The differences between different tissues, such as brain and muscle, and between healthy and unhealthy human cells are largely defined by changes in the abundance of proteins in the cells. Transcription—the process that governs the flow of genetic information from DNA to RNA—was long believed to play the dominant role in determining the quantity of proteins in a cell. But over the past decade, many studies have claimed that in animals, differences in the rate at which RNA is translated into proteins are a more important factor.

Several new studies, one co-authored by a UCLA professor, show that transcription is in fact the most influential step in determining protein abundance. A summary of this research is published in the journal Science.

Jingyi Jessica Li, an assistant professor of statistics and human genetics in the UCLA College, and Mark Biggin at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, reviewed these recent studies, including one they performed, and concluded that makes the largest contribution to abundance. Their study and the other recent work they reviewed use more careful statistical methods that estimate or reduce the impact of experimental measurement errors. Li and Biggin showed that much of what was taken to be an effect of translation in the earlier studies is actually a result of experimental errors.

The researchers conclude that more accurate measurement and analysis methods are needed for gene expression to be accurately modeled by scientists.

Their research has implications for identifying pharmaceuticals that can effectively treat a variety of diseases

Explore further: System-wide analyses have underestimated the importance of transcription in animals

More information: Statistics requantitates the central dogma, Science 6 March 2015: Vol. 347 no. 6226 pp. 1066-1067 . DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa8332 . http://www.sciencemag.org/content/347/6226/1066.full

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Why mole rats are more flexible than we previously thought

August 29, 2016

One of the most interesting facts about mole rats - that, as with ants and termites, individuals specialise in particular tasks throughout their lives - turns out to be wrong. Instead, a new study led by the University of ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

JVK
1 / 5 (2) Mar 21, 2015
I asked the question after a 2012 SFN meeting presentation. Everyone else in the room seemed to already know the answer. During the past decade researchers had learned that the microRNA/messenger RNA balance is responsible for all downstream effects on cell type differentiation.

See Suzan Mazur's interview article about the works of Luis P. Villarreal.
Luis P. Villarreal: We Need a Nonlinear Language for Life http://www.huffin...898.html

The balance of viral microRNAs to nutrient-dependent microRNAs appears to determine the microRNA/messenger RNA balance. If so, the link from the sun's biological energy to cell type differentiation via light-induced amino acid substitutions is also the clearest link from the epigenetic landscape to the RNA-mediated physical landscape of DNA in the organized genomes of species from microbes to man.

See also: http://www.gregbe...ture.cfm Review in Nature

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.