Three's a charm: NIST detectors reveal entangled photon triplets

September 14, 2014
NIST chip containing a single-photon detector was made of superconducting nanowires. Four chips like this were used in the experiment that entangled three photons. Credit: Verma/NIST

Researchers at the University of Waterloo in Canada have directly entangled three photons in the most technologically useful state for the first time, thanks in part to superfast, super-efficient single-photon detectors developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Entanglement is a special feature of the in which certain properties of individual particles become linked such that knowledge of the quantum state of any one particle dictates that of the others. Entanglement plays a critical role in quantum information systems. Prior to this work it was impossible to entangle more than two photons without also destroying their fragile quantum states.

Entangled photon triplets could be useful in quantum computing and —technologies with potentially vast power based on storing and manipulating information in quantum states—as well as achieving elusive goals in physics dating back to Einstein. The team went on to use the entangled triplets to perform a key test of .

The Waterloo/NIST experiment, described in Nature Photonics, generated three photons with entangled polarization—vertical or horizontal orientation—at a rate of 660 triplets per hour. (The same research group previously entangled the timing and energy of three photons, a state that is more difficult to use in quantum information systems.)

"The NIST detectors enabled us to take data almost 100 times faster," says NIST physicist Krister Shalm, who was a postdoctoral researcher at Waterloo. "The detectors enabled us to do things we just couldn't do before. They allowed us to speed everything up so the experiment could be much more stable, which greatly improved the quality of our results."

This picture shows the University of Waterloo laboratory where scientists entangled three photons. NIST's single-photon detectors were chilled to near absolute zero in the refrigerator (large blue cylinder). The experiment had to be performed in the dark because of the need to detect very low light levels. Credit: Shalm/NIST

The experiments started with a blue photon that was polarized both vertically and horizontally—such a superposition of two states is another unique feature of the quantum world. The photon was sent through a special crystal that converted it to two entangled red daughter photons, each with half the original energy. Researchers engineered the system to ensure that this pair had identical polarization. Then one daughter photon was sent through another crystal to generate two near-infrared granddaughter photons entangled with the second daughter photon.

The result was three with the same polarization, either horizontal or vertical—which could represent 0 and 1 in a quantum computer or quantum communications system. As an added benefit, the granddaughter photons had a wavelength commonly used in telecommunications, so they can be transmitted through fiber, an advantage for practical applications.

Triplets are rare. In this process, called cascaded down-conversion, the first stage works only about 1 in a billion times, and the second is not much better: 1 in a million. To measure experimental polarization results against 27 possible states of a set of three photons, researchers performed forensic reconstructions by taking snapshot measurements of the quantum states of thousands of triplets. The NIST detectors were up to these tasks, able to detect and measure individual photons at telecom wavelengths more than 90 percent of the time.

The superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors incorporated key recent improvements made at NIST, chiefly the use of tungsten silicide, which among other benefits greatly boosted efficiency.

To demonstrate the quality and value of the triplets, researchers tested local realism—finding evidence that, as quantum theory predicts, do not have specific values before being measured.* Researchers also measured one of each of a succession of triplets to show they could herald or announce the presence of the remaining entangled pairs. An on-demand system like this would be useful in quantum repeaters, which could extend the range of quantum communications systems, or sharing of secret data encryption keys.

With improvements in conversion efficiency through use of novel materials or other means, it may be possible to add more stages to the down-conversion process to generate four or more entangled .

Explore further: Quantum physics mimics spooky action into the past

More information: D.R. Hamel, L.K. Shalm, H.H. Hubel, A.J. Miller, F. Marsili, V.B. Verma, R.P. Mirin, S.W. Nam, K.J. Resch and T. Jennewein. Direct generation of three-photon polarization entanglement. Nature Photonics. Published online Sept. 14. DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.218

Note:
* Specifically, the researchers calculated Mermin and Svetlichny inequalities, two tests of local realism. One result was the strongest-ever measured violation of the three-particle Svetlichny inequality, according to the paper.

Related Stories

Quantum physics mimics spooky action into the past

April 23, 2012

Physicists of the group of Prof. Anton Zeilinger at the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI), the University of Vienna, and the Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology (VCQ) have, for the ...

Recommended for you

CP violation or new physics?

July 25, 2016

(Phys.org)—Over the past few years, multiple neutrino experiments have detected hints for leptonic charge parity (CP) violation—a finding that could help explain why the universe is made of matter and not antimatter. ...

World's most sensitive dark matter detector completes search

July 21, 2016

The Large Underground Xenon (LUX) dark matter experiment, which operates beneath a mile of rock at the Sanford Underground Research Facility in the Black Hills of South Dakota, has completed its silent search for the missing ...

16 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

tonybudz
1 / 5 (1) Sep 14, 2014
Skynet begins. :)
antialias_physorg
not rated yet Sep 15, 2014
Skynet begins.

Then I guesss it's up to us to stop being assholes who require weapons to defend against members of your own species.
Jixo
Sep 15, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
russell_russell
2.3 / 5 (3) Sep 15, 2014
http://phys.org/n...ent.html

For the knowledgeable ...reader.
I need AP's Gelassenheit und Wit, I really do. Sock puppets are frustrating and disappointing.
One out of every two hundreds comments they have a correct comment. Broken clocks.
Mimath224
5 / 5 (1) Sep 15, 2014
@antialias_physorg. As a layman I need some suggested site/paper that explains where a photon converts into 2 photons with 1/2 the energy of the original. Thanks
russell_russell
5 / 5 (1) Sep 16, 2014
http://entangleme...r_qubits
@Jixo
This is the link you provided fifteen months ago.
The link here is a gif that differs from the link you provided fifteen months ago.
russell_russell
5 / 5 (1) Sep 16, 2014
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (1) Sep 16, 2014
As a layman I need some suggested site/paper that explains where a photon converts into 2 photons with 1/2 the energy of the original.


A very simple explanation can be found here:
http://www.if.ufr.../PDC.htm

Generally you want to look for the term "parametric down conversion" . E.g. like this:
http://scholar.go...nversion
Mimath224
5 / 5 (1) Sep 16, 2014
@antialias_physorg Thanks for the links...give me something to read eh?
Jixo
Sep 16, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Jixo
Sep 16, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Jixo
Sep 16, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Jixo
Sep 16, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Da Schneib
not rated yet Sep 20, 2014
@antialias_physorg Thanks for the links...give me something to read eh?
Mimath, the crystal was probably the Type II spontaneous parametric down-converter BBO, AKA beta barium borate. β-Ba(BO₂)₂. You can read about SPDC here: http://en.wikiped...nversion

On edit: I was wrong, it's a Type I SPDC, which means it was probably KDP, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, which is also on Wikipedia.
Mimath224
4 / 5 (1) Sep 20, 2014
Thanks for the help, posters. Ha, I hope I can read them all and come back with a comment...that is before comments close here. Thank you.
Mimath224
5 / 5 (1) Sep 21, 2014
I thank everyone for their help. While I was searching and reading various articles I came upon the following video titled 'one photon in two photons out'
http://www.youtub...OqvnkBxk
The articles I read complemented the video and as a result now appreciate this article a little more...well, in as much as layman can, that is.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.