Bird brains more precise than humans'

September 19, 2014
Bird brains more precise than humans'
The motion study used by QBI researchers.

(Phys.org) —Birds have been found to display superior judgement of their body width compared to humans, in research to help design autonomous aircraft navigation systems.

A University of Queensland (UQ) study has found that budgerigars can fly between gaps almost as narrow as their outstretched wingspan rather than taking evasive measures such as tucking in their wings.

UQ Queensland Brain Institute researcher Dr Ingo Schiffner said previous research showed humans unnecessarily turned their shoulders to pass through doorways narrower than 130 per cent of their body width, whereas are far more precise.

"We were quite surprised by the birds' accuracy – they can judge their wingspan within 106 per cent of their width when it comes to flying through gaps," Dr Schiffner said.

"When you think about the cluttered environments they fly through, such as forests, they need to develop this level of accuracy.

"When they encounter a narrow gap, they either lift their wings up vertically or tuck them in completely, minimising their width to that of their torso," he said.

The researchers wanted to know precisely how birds judge gaps between obstacles before engaging in evasive manoeuvres.

In testing, budgies flew down corridors with variable widths between obstacles, and their flights were recorded with high-speed cameras for analysis.

Dr Schiffner said the research would be applied to robotics work at the Queensland Brain Institute's Neuroscience of Vision and Aerial Robotics laboratory.

"If we can understand how birds avoid obstacles, we might be able to develop algorithms for aircraft to avoid obstacles as well," he said.

"For instance, urban drones used for deliveries would need to fly through complex environments such as tight alleyways or between trees at the front of homes.

"For us, it isn't the ability to tuck in wings that is of interest if we are talking about fixed-wing or rotor aircraft, but whether we can replicate what happens neurologically in birds as they navigate."

To judge airspeed, budgies use optic flow – the rate visual cues pass by the eyes. They do not see three-dimensionally like humans, due to the lateral placement of their eyes and lack of binocular overlap.

"Seeing in three dimensions requires two eyes or cameras with sufficient visual overlap, so using with just one camera would be very useful, saving weight and keeping autonomous vehicles small."

The paper, Minding the gap: In-flight body awareness in birds, is published in Frontiers in Zoology.

Explore further: Research reveals that birds use optic flow cues to guide flight

More information: The complete study is available online: www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/11/1/64

Related Stories

Is your Budgie left-handed?

December 9, 2013

The short answer is no. Unlike people, Australian budgerigars do not have a dominant hand (or claw), scientists studying the brain and visual system have found.

Recommended for you

Why mole rats are more flexible than we previously thought

August 29, 2016

One of the most interesting facts about mole rats - that, as with ants and termites, individuals specialise in particular tasks throughout their lives - turns out to be wrong. Instead, a new study led by the University of ...

5 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

verkle
Sep 19, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Tektrix
5 / 5 (3) Sep 19, 2014
"... without having to throw in "evolution did it" type of phrases"

Way to moot your own point.
HeloMenelo
not rated yet Sep 19, 2014
"Seeing in three dimensions requires two eyes or cameras with sufficient visual overlap, so using optic flow with just one camera would be very useful, saving weight and keeping autonomous vehicles small."

Just one question i'm not the expert in this field i'm just curious, why then can i see in three dimensions if i close one of my eyes, or does the brain somehow compensate for the absence of one eye ? ie sort of simulates what i am suppose to see ?

If so it does an almost unbelievably good job doing so ?
Goika
Sep 19, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
antigoracle
1 / 5 (1) Sep 19, 2014
So, being called a birdbrain is now a complement.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.