Massive neutrinos may not bring about cosmological concordance after all

Aug 06, 2014 by Lisa Zyga feature
Scientists have found that tension among different data sets persists even after accounting for massive sterile neutrinos, possibly indicating systematic biases in the measurements. Credit: Leistedt, et al. ©2014 American Physical Society

(Phys.org) —Scientists have many tools for measuring the cosmic structures of the universe, which includes structures such as galaxies, galaxy clusters, and intergalactic gas. Cosmic structures can be observed directly, such as by observations of large-scale structure, or indirectly, such as with experiments that measure temperature fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background. Although having multiple ways to measure cosmic structure is beneficial, there is one problem: the measurements don't agree.

Recently, several studies have suggested that this disagreement, or tension, in the data can be relieved by massive sterile neutrinos. Neutrinos were originally thought to be massless, but experiments later showed that they do have mass. Massive neutrinos suppress the growth of structures that lead to the formation of . For this reason, it has been claimed that fairly massive neutrinos resolve the tension between the experimental data and bring the different measurements into better agreement.

But in a new study published in Physical Review Letters, physicists Boris Leistedt and Hiranya V. Peiris from University College London, along with Licia Verde at the University of Barcelona and the University of Oslo, have shown that this may not be so.

The scientists demonstrated that massive neutrinos (as massive as has been proposed) do not bring about a new cosmological concordance between the measurements. Instead, the apparent concordance may result from systematic biases in the measurements. Overall, the results suggest that the tension between the measurements must be resolved either by considering systematics in one or more of the data sets, or—if further investigation shows that correcting systematic effects does not resolve the tension—then new physics other than the introduction of massive neutrinos must be considered.

In terms of a larger framework for viewing cosmic structure, the results here strongly favor the cold dark matter model with a cosmological constant over more complex models that are extended with massive neutrinos. Yet, as the researchers explain, the questions surrounding cosmic structure are still far from being answered.

"There is no evidence for significantly massive neutrinos in cosmology," Verde, on behalf of all of the authors, told Phys.org. "Therefore there is not yet the need for extending the standard cosmological model to include an extra parameter for neutrino mass."

Instead, future investigations will likely focus on finding exactly what the neutrino mass is.

"Particle physics experiments give a firm lower limit to the , cosmology at present gives an upper limit," Verde said. "But there is not much wiggle room left. The next generation of cosmology surveys will have enough statistical power to really see neutrino masses if systematics can be kept under control. That is the real challenge but also the exciting prospect. Such a detection would have profound implications for both cosmology and ."

Explore further: Massive neutrinos and new standard cosmological model: No concordance yet

More information: — Paper citation: Boris Leistedt, et al. "No New Cosmological Concordance with Massive Sterile Neutrinos." PRL 113, 041301 (2014). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.041301

— From Early Universe @UCL: Concordance or Contradiction? http://www.earlyuniverse.org/concordance-or-contradiction/

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Massive neutrinos solve a cosmological conundrum

Feb 10, 2014

(Phys.org) —Scientists have solved a major problem with the current standard model of cosmology by combining results from the Planck spacecraft and measurements of gravitational lensing to deduce the mass ...

Glimmer of light in the search for dark matter

Feb 27, 2014

The Leiden astrophysicist Alexey Boyarsky and his fellow researchers may have identified a trace of dark matter that could signify a new particle: the sterile neutrino. A research group in Harvard reported ...

Astronomers challenge Cosmological Model

Apr 03, 2014

(Phys.org) —Astronomers Professor Chris Collins and Dr Ian McCarthy from LJMU's Astrophysics Research Institute are challenging the view that the currently preferred cosmological model of the Universe is ...

South Pole Telescope hones in on dark energy, neutrinos

Apr 02, 2012

Analysis of data from the 10-meter South Pole Telescope is providing new support for the most widely accepted explanation of dark energy — the source of the mysterious force that is responsible for the ...

Recommended for you

Particles, waves and ants

5 hours ago

Animals looking for food or light waves moving through turbid media – astonishing similarities have now been found between completely different phenomena.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

George_Rajna
Aug 06, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
George_Rajna
Aug 06, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
11791
Aug 06, 2014
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
theon
3 / 5 (1) Aug 06, 2014
Ever thought about thinking out of the linear-structure-formation box?
arom
1.5 / 5 (2) Aug 07, 2014
Scientists have many tools for measuring the cosmic structures of the universe …. Although having multiple ways to measure cosmic structure is beneficial, there is one problem: the measurements don't agree.
Recently, several studies have suggested that this disagreement, or tension, in the data can be relieved by massive sterile neutrinos…. But in a new study… have shown that this may not be so.
In terms of a larger framework for viewing cosmic structure, the results here strongly favor the cold dark matter model with a cosmological constant over more complex models that are extended with massive neutrinos. Yet, as the researchers explain, the questions surrounding cosmic structure are still far from being answered.
…. "Therefore there is not yet the need for extending the standard cosmological model to include an extra parameter for neutrino mass."

Everyone who are familiar with the standard cosmological model known that it arisen from Einstein general relativity with no cosmological constant, so this seems to be the root cause. Maybe returning of the omitted constant could solve the problem …. http://www.vacuum...=7〈=en

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.