Should we listen to our genes, or does mother know best?

Jul 23, 2014
Should we listen to our genes, or does mother know best?
The new study shows in rapidly changing environments, offspring develop very different characteristics from their mothers to meet new challenges to survival.

Breaking the mould of inherited family characteristics could help you survive in a fast-changing world, scientists have discovered.

The way we look is for a large part determined by our genes, which have remained largely unchanged for thousands of generations. However, a pioneering new study, by scientists including from the University of Exeter's Penryn Campus, has shown that such slowly changing genes are only beneficial in a steady environment.

In periods of rapid environmental change, relying on genes can be highly disadvantageous. Instead you need new tricks that fit to your new surroundings, in order to survive.

In this pioneering study, scientists investigated whether natural selection would favour parents to have offspring that would largely resemble themselves (which is typically the case for genetically encoded characters); or whether parents would favour their offspring to be more different.

For example, it is known that parents born with a high susceptibility to certain disease often bear offspring with a much lower susceptibility, due to the transmission of multiple maternal factors, such as antibodies and hormones during pregnancy or breastfeeding.

The collaborative research saw scientists, including those from the University of Exeter, UCL and the University of Cambridge, use cutting–edge mathematical modelling to predict how these multiple maternal effects evolve to meet the needs of an organisms' natural environment.

The study showed that, in rapidly changing environments, offspring will develop very different characteristics from their mothers in order to meet the new challenges to survival.

However, traits that have helped a species survive over generations will continue to be displayed by offspring when the environment remains unchanged.

Professor Stuart Townley, from the University of Exeter's Mathematics department at the Penryn Campus in Cornwall, and one of the study's co-authors said: "What we can see from this study is that a significant change in an organism's inherent characteristic is a clear signature of ."

Lead author Dr Bram Kuijper, from the University College London added: "What may have been a crucial characteristic for our ancestors to display may become redundant as the world around us changes. In order to survive, organisms need to rapidly modify their own behaviour to meet new challenges and threats."

The study, The Evolution of Multivariate Maternal Effects, is published in PLOS Computational Biology.

Explore further: Feedback control could be key to robust conservation management

More information: Kuijper B, Johnstone RA, Townley S (2014) "The Evolution of Multivariate Maternal Effects." PLoS Comput Biol 10(4): e1003550. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003550

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Ninety-eight new beetle species discovered in Indonesia

10 hours ago

Ninety-eight new species of the beetle genus Trigonopterus have been described from Java, Bali and other Indonesian islands. Museum scientists from Germany and their local counterparts used an innovative approa ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

JVK
not rated yet Jul 23, 2014
Re: "...a significant change in an organism's inherent characteristic is a clear signature of environmental change."

Environmental change is directly linked to morphological and behavioral phenotypes via the epigenetic effects of food odors and the metabolism of nutrients to species-specific pheromones that control the physiology of reproduction in species from microbes to man.

The epigenetic effects alter the microRNA/messenger RNA balance, which links the epigenetic landscape to the physical landscape of DNA in organized genomes.

Researchers who would rather people continue to think in terms of evolution and unexplained nongenetic effects -- and science journalists who decide to portray research published on April 10, 2014 in a report on July 23, 2014 -- may be among the last to admit that the third way of evolution is not evolution. http://www.thethi...ion.com/

Ecological variation and ecological adaptations are responsible for biodiversity.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.