Massive exoplanets may be more earth-like than thought: 'Super-earths' likely to have both oceans and continents

Jan 07, 2014

(Phys.org) —Massive terrestrial planets, called "super-Earths," are known to be common in our galaxy, the Milky Way. Now a Northwestern University astrophysicist and a University of Chicago geophysicist report the odds of these planets having an Earth-like climate are much greater than previously thought.

Nicolas B. Cowan and Dorian Abbot's new model challenges the conventional wisdom which says super-Earths actually would be very unlike Earth—each would be a waterworld, with its surface completely covered in . They conclude that most tectonically active super-Earths—regardless of mass—store most of their water in the mantle and will have both oceans and exposed continents, enabling a stable climate such as Earth's.

Cowan is a postdoctoral fellow at Northwestern's Center for Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics, and Abbot is an assistant professor in geophysical sciences at UChicago.

"Are the surfaces of super-Earths totally dry or covered in water?" Cowan said. "We tackled this question by applying known geophysics to astronomy.

"Super-Earths are expected to have deep oceans that will overflow their basins and inundate the entire surface, but we show this logic to be flawed," he said. "Terrestrial planets have significant amounts of water in their interior. Super-Earths are likely to have shallow oceans to go along with their shallow ocean basins."

In their model, Cowan and Abbot treated the intriguing exoplanets like Earth, which has quite a bit of water in its mantle, the rocky part that makes up most of the volume and mass of the planet. The rock of the mantle contains tiny amounts of water, which quickly adds up because the mantle is so large. And a cycle moves water between oceans and the mantle. (An exoplanet, or extrasolar planet, is a planet outside our solar system.)

Cowan will present the findings at a press conference, "Windows on Other Worlds," to be held at 10:15 a.m. EST (Eastern Standard Time) Tuesday, Jan. 7, at the 223rd meeting of the American Astronomical Society (AAS) annual meeting in Washington, D.C. (The press conference will be held in Chesapeake D/E at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center.)

Cowan also will discuss the research at a scientific session to be held from 2 to 3:30 p.m. EST Wednesday, Jan. 8, at the AAS meeting (Potomac Ballroom D, Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center). The study appears in the Jan. 20 issue of the Astrophysical Journal.

Water is constantly traded back and forth between the ocean and the because of plate tectonics, Cowan and Abbot say. The division of water between ocean and mantle is controlled by seafloor pressure, which is proportional to gravity.

Accounting for the effects of seafloor pressure and high gravity are two novel factors in their model. As the size of the super-Earths increase, gravity and seafloor pressure also go up.

"We can put 80 times more water on a super-Earth and still have its surface look like Earth," Cowan said. "These massive planets have enormous sea floor pressure, and this force pushes water into the mantle."

It doesn't take that much water to tip a planet into being a waterworld. "If Earth was 1 percent water by mass, we'd all drown, regardless of the deep water cycle," Cowan said. "The surface would be covered in water. Whether or not you have a deep really matters for planets that are one one-thousandth or one ten-thousandth water."

The ability of super-Earths to maintain exposed continents is important for planetary climate. On planets with exposed continents, like Earth, the deep carbon cycle is mediated by surface temperatures, which produces a stabilizing feedback (a thermostat on geological timescales).

"Such a feedback probably can't exist in a waterworld, which means they should have a much smaller habitable zone," Abbot said. "By making super-Earths 80 times more likely to have exposed continents, we've dramatically improved their odds of having Earth-like climate."

Cowan and Abbot accede that there are two major uncertainties in their model: that super-Earths have and the amount of water Earth stores in its mantle.

"These are the two things we would like to know better to improve our model," Cowan said. "Our model is a shot from the hip, but it's an important step in advancing how we think about super-Earths."

The paper is titled "Water cycling between ocean and : super-Earths need not be waterworlds."

Explore further: New theoretical models aid the search for Earth-like planets

Related Stories

Are super-Earths actually mini-Neptunes?

Feb 04, 2013

(Phys.org)—In the last two decades astronomers have found hundreds of planets in orbit around other stars. One type of these so-called 'exoplanets' is the super-Earths that are thought to have a high proportion ...

Water-Ice Super-Earths

Aug 27, 2010

A "super-Earth" is a planet around another star (an "exoplanet") whose mass is less than about ten times that of the Earth. Of the 480 or so extrasolar planets now known, most have masses larger than the mass ...

Cloud behavior expands habitable zone of alien planets

Jul 01, 2013

A new study that calculates the influence of cloud behavior on climate doubles the number of potentially habitable planets orbiting red dwarfs, the most common type of stars in the universe. This finding ...

Recommended for you

Mystery of rare five-hour space explosion explained

Sep 17, 2014

Next week in St. Petersburg, Russia, scientists on an international team that includes Penn State University astronomers will present a paper that provides a simple explanation for mysterious ultra-long gamma-ray ...

Glowing galaxies in telescopic timelapse

Sep 17, 2014

We often speak of the discoveries and data flowing from astronomical observatories, which makes it easy to forget the cool factor. Think of it—huge telescopes are probing the universe under crystal-clear ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Drjsa_oba
3.3 / 5 (3) Jan 08, 2014
all about 'Super-Earths' it is the definition that dictates the result. If you label it a Super-Earth if it has similar ratios of water/iron/silicates/carbon to earth then you are setting yourself up for a easier to understand and compute result. But if you label anything that is smaller than Neptune as a 'Super -Earth' then all bets are off.

Lets stop calling everything we spot a Super-Earth until we are sure what it is we are talking about. If in doubt then just call it an exoplanet.

I am sick of every thing that is not a star being called a Super-Earth it is making me crazy.
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
5 / 5 (1) Jan 08, 2014
Good news! They conclude that planets of _any_ mass can sustain up to 0.2 % water by mass, which is 20 times that of comparably dry Earth.

In early models I've seen, most siliceous superEarths (which are also those with free water instead of CO2 atmospheres) can sustain plate tectonics up to somewhere close to miniNeptune sizes (2 Earth radii). So this will work.

Also, subduction, which is frequent in plate tectonic regimes is likely essential to get life started, if our own phylogeny with alkaline hydrothermal vent metabolism holds up.

[Of course, stagnant-lid regimes, such as our own putative Archean Earth, likely permits some subduction. (If we had a stagnant lid, we still had 10 % subduction to predict Sd ratios.) So maybe stagnant-lid Mars had early life too.]

@Drsja_oba: It is an accepted label for a size range. Your misinterpretation may be common, but won't make scientists change terminology. (Re: "theory" and other common misinterpretations.)
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
5 / 5 (1) Jan 08, 2014
It hits me that if the model is roughly linear, their 80 times larger ocean suppression may mean up to 80 times larger ocean floor pressures. Luckily prokaryotes seems to thrive down to 10 km or 1000 atmospheres, so much of an extreme case superEarth shallow oceans would still be habitable to at least 100 m of depth.
ACW
1 / 5 (1) Jan 08, 2014
I believe that their definition of a super-earth pertains to rocky planets, rather than Jupiter or Neptune type gas giants.
http://www.washin...ory.html
Anda
not rated yet Jan 09, 2014
Still waiting here for the announcement that one superearth found is definitely a rocky planet.
Till then it's all speculations.