Proton radius puzzle may be solved by quantum gravity

Nov 26, 2013 by Lisa Zyga feature
The quark structure of the proton. Credit: Arpad Horvath / Wikipedia.

(Phys.org) —Officially, the radius of a proton is 0.88 ± 0.01 femtometers (fm, or 10-15 m). Researchers attained that value using two methods: first, by measuring the proton's energy levels using hydrogen spectroscopy, and second, by using electron scattering experiments, where an electron beam is shot at a proton and the way the electrons scatter is used to calculate the proton's size.

But when trying to further improve the precision of the radius value in 2010 with a third experimental technique, physicists got a value of 0.842 ± 0.001 fm—a difference of 7 deviations from the official value. These experiments used muonic hydrogen, in which a negatively charged muon orbits around the proton, instead of atomic hydrogen, in which an electron orbits around the proton. Because a muon is 200 times heavier than an electron, a muon orbits closer to a proton than an electron does, and can determine the proton size more precisely.

This inconsistency between proton radius values, called the "proton radius puzzle," has gained a lot of attention lately and has led to several proposed explanations. Some of these explanations include new degrees of freedom beyond the Standard Model, as well as extra dimensions.

Now in a new paper published in EPL, physicist Roberto Onofrio at the University of Padova in Padova, Italy, and the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, has suggested that the muonic hydrogen experiment may be providing a hint of quantum gravity. He has proposed that the proton radius puzzle can be solved by considering a new theory of quantum gravity that is based on the unification of gravity and the weak force, also called "gravitoweak unification."

In this theoretical scenario, conventional Newtonian gravity holds at large distances, but morphs into a different kind of gravitational interaction at very small scales. Specifically, the strength of the gravitational interactions is equal to the strength of the weak charged interactions that occur among subatomic particles. The weak charged interactions can be considered as manifestations of the quantized structure of gravity at or below the Fermi scale.

As Onofrio theoretically shows in his paper, quantum gravity of this nature contributes an additional binding energy to the muonic hydrogen experiments, which explains the smaller proton radius value. In these experiments, the proton radius value was measured in terms of an energy difference between two energy levels, called the Lamb shift.

Onofrio calculated that the gravitational energy contribution in the atomic hydrogen experiments is about two orders of magnitude smaller than in the muonic hydrogen experiments, due to the electron's smaller mass compared to the muon. Onofrio evaluated that the energy contribution should be noticeable when measuring the Lamb shift of , and its absence in the data could imply the presence of a flavor-dependent interaction, similar to what happens already for the well-known charged weak interaction.

"Muonic hydrogen is unique in that it probes small distances at an unprecedented precision, so it may pick up any small force acting between the constituents," Onofrio told Phys.org. "Since the explanation I provide relies on the mass of the nuclei, complementary tests may be performed on variants of muonic hydrogen currently under experimental study, more specifically the measurement of the Lamb shift in muonic deuterium, and muonic helium spectroscopy. In the EPL paper, I make a definite prediction for muonic deuterium, for instance."

Perhaps the most exciting outcome of this work is that it shows that muonic may be used to test possible scenarios of gravitoweak unification, with providing evidence of gravity's effects at very small scales.

"This work shows that the combination of high-precision spectroscopy and the use of exotic atoms with size in between ordinary atoms and nuclei may open a novel way to test physics at the attometer scale, a scale at which, according to my conjecture developed in a former paper, is acting also under the form of what we now know as weak interactions," Onofrio said.

Onofrio plans to continue to pursue the gravitoweak conjecture in various directions, and to investigate how it matches with what we know from the Standard Model of particle physics in which weak interactions are mixed with electromagnetic ones. He has outlined the future research landscape in a second paper, listed below.

Explore further: Proton weak charge determined for first time: Initial Q-weak experiement results

More information: Roberto Onofrio. "Proton radius puzzle and quantum gravity at the Fermi scale." EPL, 104 (2013) 20002. DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/104/20002

Roberto Onofrio. "On Weak Interactions as Short-Distance Manifestations of Gravity." Modern Physics Letters A, Vol. 28, No. 7 (2013) 1350022 (7 pages). DOI: 10.1142/S0217732313500223

Related Stories

Physicists confirm surprisingly small proton radius

Jan 24, 2013

International team of physicists confirms surprisingly small proton radius with laser spectroscopy of exotic hydrogen. The initial results puzzled the world three years ago: the size of the proton (to be precise, its charge ...

Particle physics: 'Honey, I shrunk the proton'

Jul 07, 2010

Scientists lobbed a bombshell into the world of sub-atomic theory on Wednesday by reporting that a primary building block of the visible Universe, the proton, is smaller than previously thought.

Recommended for you

What time is it in the universe?

21 hours ago

Flavor Flav knows what time it is. At least he does for Flavor Flav. Even with all his moving and accelerating, with the planet, the solar system, getting on planes, taking elevators, and perhaps even some ...

Watching the structure of glass under pressure

Aug 28, 2014

Glass has many applications that call for different properties, such as resistance to thermal shock or to chemically harsh environments. Glassmakers commonly use additives such as boron oxide to tweak these ...

Inter-dependent networks stress test

Aug 28, 2014

Energy production systems are good examples of complex systems. Their infrastructure equipment requires ancillary sub-systems structured like a network—including water for cooling, transport to supply fuel, and ICT systems ...

Explainer: How does our sun shine?

Aug 28, 2014

What makes our sun shine has been a mystery for most of human history. Given our sun is a star and stars are suns, explaining the source of the sun's energy would help us understand why stars shine. ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

shavera
5 / 5 (1) Nov 26, 2013
It'd be nice to see some additional information about this proposed "gravitoweak" interaction. Does it answer any other questions like dark matter or dark energy?
tadchem
1.8 / 5 (10) Nov 26, 2013
You've got to love a theory that makes testable predictions!
oldguy
1.9 / 5 (13) Nov 26, 2013
hmmm, I wonder if this theory has anything to do with this particular phenomena:

http://wavewatchi...edition/

Gravitoweak and radioctive decay vs the sun's distance.
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
Nov 26, 2013
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Protoplasmix
1 / 5 (9) Nov 26, 2013
The Wiki page on leptons says that exotic atoms can be formed with both muons and tauons. I wonder if they could do the measurement using a tau – at nearly twice the mass of a proton. Do the muon/tau have a longer half-life in a bound state?