Waking up to a new year: Team discovers an exoplanet that orbits its star in 8.5 hours

August 19, 2013 by Jennifer Chu

In the time it takes you to complete a single workday, or get a full night's sleep, a small fireball of a planet 700 light-years away has already completed an entire year.

Researchers at MIT have discovered an Earth-sized named Kepler 78b that whips around its host star in a mere 8.5 hours—one of the shortest orbital periods ever detected. The planet is extremely close to its star—its orbital radius is only about three times the radius of the star—and the scientists have estimated that its may be as high as 3,000 degrees Kelvin, or more than 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit. In such a scorching environment, the top layer of the planet is likely completely melted, creating a massive, roiling ocean of lava.

What's most exciting to scientists is that they were able to detect emitted by the planet—the first time that researchers have been able to do so for an exoplanet as small as Kepler 78b. This light, once analyzed with larger telescopes, may give scientists detailed information about the planet's and reflective properties.

Kepler 78b is so close to its star that scientists hope to measure its on the star. Such information may be used to measure the planet's mass, which could make Kepler 78b the first Earth-sized planet outside our own solar system whose mass is known.

The researchers reported their discovery of Kepler 78b in The Astrophysical Journal.

In a separate paper, published in Astrophysical Journal Letters, members of that same group, along with others at MIT and elsewhere, observed KOI 1843.03, a previously discovered exoplanet with an even shorter : just 4 1/4 hours. The group, led by physics professor emeritus Saul Rappaport, determined that in order for the planet to maintain its extremely tight orbit around its star, it would have to be incredibly dense, made almost entirely of iron—otherwise, the immense tidal forces from the nearby star would rip the planet to pieces.

"Just the fact that it's able to survive there implies that it's very dense," says Josh Winn, an associate professor of physics at MIT, and co-author on both papers. "Whether nature actually makes planets that are dense enough to survive even closer in, that's an open question, and would be even more amazing."

Dips in the data

In their discovery of Kepler 78b, the team that wrote the Astrophysical Journal paper looked through more than 150,000 that were monitored by the Kepler Telescope, a NASA space observatory that surveys a slice of the galaxy. Scientists are analyzing data from Kepler in hopes of identifying habitable, Earth-sized planets.

The goal for Winn and his colleagues was to look for Earth-sized planets with very short orbital periods.

"We've gotten used to planets having orbits of a few days," Winn says. "But we wondered, what about a few hours? Is that even possible? And sure enough, there are some out there."

To find them, the team analyzed light data from thousands of stars, looking for telltale dips indicating that a planet may periodically pass in front of a star.

Picking out these tiny dips among tens of thousands of light curves is typically a time-intensive ordeal. To speed the process along, the group devised a more automated approach, applying a basic mathematical method known as the Fourier transform to the large dataset. The method essentially whittles the field to those light curves that are periodic, or that exhibit a repetitive pattern.

Stars that host orbiting planets may display periodic dips of light each time a planet crosses, or transits, the star. But there are other periodic stellar phenomena that can affect light emission, such as a star eclipsing another star. To pick out those signals associated with actual planets, physics graduate student Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda searched through the set of periodic light curves, looking for frequent smaller dips in the data midway between the planetary transits.

The group was able to detect the light given off by the planet by measuring the amount by which the overall light dimmed each time the planet passed behind the star. The researchers posit that the planet's light is possibly a combination of radiation from its heated surface and light reflected by surface materials, such as lava and atmospheric vapor.

"I was just looking by eye, and all of a sudden I see this extra drop of light right when it was expected, and it was really beautiful," Sanchis-Ojeda recalls. "I thought, we're actually seeing the light from the planet. It was a really exciting moment."

Living on a lava world

From their measurements of Kepler 78b, the team determined that the planet is about 40 times closer to its star than Mercury is to our sun. The star around which Kepler 78b orbits is likely relatively young, as it rotates more than twice as fast as the sun—a sign that the star has not had as much time to slow down.

While it is about the size of Earth, Kepler 78b is most certainly not habitable, due to its extreme proximity to its .

"You'd have to really stretch your imagination to imagine living on a lava world," Winn says. "We certainly wouldn't survive there."

But this doesn't entirely rule out the possibility of other habitable, short-period . Winn's group is now looking for exoplanets that orbit brown dwarfs—cold, almost-dead stars that somehow failed to ignite.

"If you're around one of those brown dwarfs, then you can get as close in as just a few days," Winn says. "It would still be habitable, at the right temperature."

Explore further: Astrophysicists find five-planet system with most Earth-like exoplanet yet

Related Stories

Einstein's exoplanet

May 27, 2013

(Phys.org) —Eight hundred and eighty nine exoplanets (planets around stars other than our Sun) have been discovered to date. Most of them were found using the Kepler satellite, which spots small dips in a star's light as ...

How common are earths around small stars?

June 3, 2013

(Phys.org) —The Kepler mission has revolutionized the study of exoplanet statistics by increasing the number of known extrasolar planets and planet candidates by a factor of five, and by discovering systems with longer ...

First transiting planets in a star cluster discovered

June 26, 2013

(Phys.org) —All stars begin their lives in groups. Most stars, including our Sun, are born in small, benign groups that quickly fall apart. Others form in huge, dense swarms that survive for billions of years as stellar ...

Recommended for you

Earth might have hairy dark matter

November 23, 2015

The solar system might be a lot hairier than we thought. A new study publishing this week in the Astrophysical Journal by Gary Prézeau of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California, proposes the existence of ...

The hottest white dwarf in the Galaxy

November 25, 2015

Astronomers at the Universities of Tübingen and Potsdam have identified the hottest white dwarf ever discovered in our Galaxy. With a temperature of 250,000 degrees Celsius, this dying star at the outskirts of the Milky ...

Scientists detect stellar streams around Magellanic Clouds

November 23, 2015

(Phys.org)—Astronomers from the University of Cambridge, U.K., have detected a number of narrow streams and diffuse debris clouds around two nearby irregular dwarf galaxies called the Magellanic Clouds. The research also ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) Aug 19, 2013
The existence of any exoplanet -even a hot one- implies the existence of many others orbiting the same star (even if only one of them has an orbit that makes it detectable by the method used by Kepler).
1 / 5 (2) Aug 19, 2013
With one that close to the star it wouldn't surprise me one bit to find one at the right distance around the same star.
5 / 5 (1) Aug 19, 2013
Yes, and yes to both of those comments. I totally agree.

I would add that the Kepler method only finds planets which eclipse the star. Our solar system has its planets fairly well-aligned along the ecliptic. We have no way of knowing how common or uncommon this is. The majority of systems 'could' have planets with oblique orbits, so we would only be able to observe a portion of the planets around any given star, even if we're lined up with their ecliptic. We could still be greatly under-estimating the number of planets around an average star.
2.3 / 5 (3) Aug 19, 2013
Very true, although this is a good sign we need to be using the wobble method on this star.
3 / 5 (2) Aug 19, 2013
The existence of any exoplanet -even a hot one- implies the existence of many others orbiting the same star

I wouldn't go so far as "implies". It may up the likelyhood a bit. But planets can also be ones captured by the star in question later on.

The closenes of the star doesn't give a clue as to its ultimate origin.
2.3 / 5 (3) Aug 19, 2013
While that is true. It's also true that we have found planets around the majority of the stars we have looked at. The likelihood then is increased of finding other planets a little further away from this star. Planets seem to be the norm, not the exception.
5 / 5 (2) Aug 19, 2013
I hate to be the one to point this out, but it's really bugging me. The article says, "and the scientists have estimated that its surface temperatures may be as high as 3,000 degrees Kelvin, or more than 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit." Because the Kelvin scale is not measured in degrees, it should say 3,000 Kelvin, not 3,000 DEGREES Kelvin.
not rated yet Aug 20, 2013
He is right,; "degrees Kelvin" is the old convention. Here is the wiki page about the Kelvin scale. I have to admit though, that the usage convention does look a bit tricky to remember. I hadn't known either, that there is such a thing as a 'noise temperature', also measured in kelvin:
But, the Newton scale?....Well, guess he did invent word 'thermometer" (meter=mesure of thermo=heat)
Here is a more unusual scale, the Wedgewood:

Cheers, DH66
not rated yet Aug 20, 2013
If the planet were tidally locked, the side facing away from the sun would be cooler. Assuming he could work out a safe way to approach the planet, an visitor could set himself up on the back side and literally watch the stars fly by.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.