One more Homo species? Recent 3-D-comparative analysis confirms status of Homo floresiensis as a fossil human species

Jul 11, 2013
One More Homo Species?
The Liang Bua 1 (LB1) cranium, shown in right side view. Credit: P. Brown

(Phys.org) —Ever since the discovery of the remains in 2003, scientists have been debating whether Homo floresiensis represents a distinct Homo species, possibly originating from a dwarfed island Homo erectus population, or a pathological modern human. The small size of its brain has been argued to result from a number of diseases, most importantly from the condition known as microcephaly.

Based on the analysis of 3-D landmark data from skull surfaces, scientists from Stony Brook University New York, the Senckenberg Center for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment, Eberhard-Karls Universität Tübingen, and the University of Minnesota provide compelling support for the hypothesis that Homo floresiensis was a distinct Homo species.

The study, titled "Homo floresiensis contextualized: a geometric morphometric comparative analysis of fossil and pathological human samples," is published in the July 10 edition of PLOS ONE.

The ancestry of the Homo floresiensis remains is much disputed.

The critical questions are: Did it represent an extinct species? Could it be a Homo erectus population, whose small stature was caused by island dwarfism?

Or, did the LB1 skull belong to a modern human with a disorder that resulted in an abnormally small brain and skull? Proposed possible explanations include , Laron Syndrome or endemic hypothyroidism ("cretinism").

Important shape differences captured by statistical analysis of the cranium after removing size differences. Healthy modern humans (Top left); modern humans with microcephaly (Bottom left); LB1 (Homo floresiensis) (Top right, shown in purple); and fossil humans belonging to the genus Homo (Bottom right). These images highlight how much taller and rounder the modern human braincase is compared to the other three groups when viewed from the side. More importantly, these images also illustrate how much more similar the LB1 skull is to fossil humans compared to modern humans suffering from microcephaly - a condition that results in a small brain size and therefore skull size - particularly in its low and elongated silhouette. The other two pathological conditions examined in this study, "cretinism" and Laron Syndrome, more closely resemble the healthy modern human condition than any of the other conditions.

The scientists applied the powerful methods of 3-D geometric morphometrics to compare the shape of the LB1 cranium (the skull minus the lower jaw) to many fossil humans, as well as a large sample of modern human crania suffering from microcephaly and other pathological conditions. Geometric morphometrics methods use 3D coordinates of cranial surface , computer imaging, and statistics to achieve a detailed analysis of shape.

This was the most comprehensive study to date to simultaneously evaluate the two competing hypotheses about the status of Homo floresiensis.

The study found that the LB1 cranium shows greater affinities to the fossil human sample than it does to pathological modern humans. Although some superficial similarities were found between fossil, LB1, and pathological modern human crania, additional features linked LB1exclusively with fossil Homo. The team could therefore refute the hypothesis of pathology.

"Our findings provide the most comprehensive evidence to date linking the Homo floresiensis skull with extinct fossil human species rather than with pathological modern humans. Our study therefore refutes the hypothesis that this specimen represents a modern human with a pathological condition, such as microcephaly," stated the scientists.

Explore further: New hadrosaur noses into spotlight

Related Stories

Were 'hobbit' hominids island dwarfs?

Apr 16, 2013

Japanese scientists on Tuesday waded into a row over so-called "hobbit" hominids whose remains, found on a remote Indonesian island a decade ago, have unleashed one of the fiercest disputes in anthropology.

First early human fossil found in Africa makes debut

Mar 07, 2013

Just over 90 years ago a discovery was made that started a fascinating journey exploring human evolution in Africa. The Broken Hill skull was the first early human fossil to be found in Africa and evidence ...

'Hobbit' fossils a new species, anthropologist says

Jan 08, 2009

An analysis of an 18,000-year-old fossil, described as the remains of a diminutive humanlike creature, proves that genuine cave-dwelling "hobbits" once flourished in Southeast Asia, according to a Long Island anthropologist ...

The Flores Hobbit's face revealed

Dec 10, 2012

An Australian anthropologist has used forensic facial reconstruction techniques to show, for the first time, how the mysterious Flores 'hobbit' might have once looked.

Recommended for you

New hadrosaur noses into spotlight

Sep 19, 2014

Call it the Jimmy Durante of dinosaurs – a newly discovered hadrosaur with a truly distinctive nasal profile. The new dinosaur, named Rhinorex condrupus by paleontologists from North Carolina State Univer ...

Militants threaten ancient sites in Iraq, Syria

Sep 19, 2014

For more than 5,000 years, numerous civilizations have left their mark on upper Mesopotamia—from Assyrians and Akkadians to Babylonians and Romans. Their ancient, buried cities, palaces and temples packed ...

New branch added to European family tree

Sep 17, 2014

The setting: Europe, about 7,500 years ago. Agriculture was sweeping in from the Near East, bringing early farmers into contact with hunter-gatherers who had already been living in Europe for tens of thousands ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

grondilu
not rated yet Jul 11, 2013
I find it amazing that a computer can make species classification on the basis of 3D analysis of bones. Wouldn't it be awesome if we could just feed a super computer with a 3D-model of all fossils ever found and ask the computer to tell us what species they are? Wouldn't it be awesome if it could also deduce a phylogeny tree? For one, that could either confirm or infirm the phylogeny deduced by genome alignments.
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
5 / 5 (1) Jul 11, 2013
Actually the classification was done by geometric morphometrics, which is more an art than an algorithm AFAIK. I.e. when you do PCA on the chosen metrics, it will tell you what went wrong, if there needs to be more metrics, et cetera. Hence the early erroneous classifications.
FainAvis
1 / 5 (2) Jul 11, 2013
@ grondilu "For one, that could either confirm or infirm the phylogeny deduced by genome alignments."
Strikeout 'infirm'. Try 'disprove'.
Pediopal
1 / 5 (6) Jul 13, 2013
Many Native American tribes spoke of "Little People". They lived away from the villages but would sometimes be seen or heard. Of course the anthropologists just blew such ignorant superstition off.