Bees under threat from disease-carrying bumblebee imports, research reveals

Jul 17, 2013

Stricter controls over bumblebee imports to the UK are urgently required to prevent diseases spreading to native bumblebees and honeybees, scientists have warned. The call follows the discovery of parasites in over three-quarters of imported bumblebee colonies they tested. The study - the first of its kind in the UK - is published today in the Journal of Applied Ecology.

While wild species of bees and other insects pollinate many crops, commercially-reared and imported bumblebees are essential for of greenhouse crops such as tomatoes. They are also used to enhance pollination of other such as strawberries, and are now marketed for use in people's gardens. The trade is large and widespread: 40-50,000 commercially-produced – each containing up to 100 – are imported annually to the UK, and more than one million colonies are sold each year worldwide.

The team of researchers from the universities of Leeds, Stirling and Sussex bought 48 colonies of buff-tailed bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) from three European producers. Some colonies were a subspecies native to the UK and others were non-native. All were meant to be disease-free, but when they were tested using DNA technology, 77% of the colonies were found to be carrying . Parasites were also found in the pollen food supplied with the bees.

Screening revealed that the imported bumblebee colonies carried a range of parasites including the three main bumblebee parasites (Crithidia bombi, Nosema bombi and Apicystis bombi), three honeybee parasites (Nosema apis, Ascosphaera apis and Paenibacillus larvae), and two parasites which infect both bumblebees and (Nosema ceranae and deformed wing virus).

After the screening tests, the team conducted a series of carefully controlled laboratory experiments to find out whether the parasites carried by the commercially-produced bumblebee colonies were viable and able to infect other bees.

Lead author of the study, Peter Graystock of the University of Leeds explains: "We found that commercially-produced bumblebee colonies contained a variety of microbial parasites, which were infectious and harmful not only to other bumblebees, but also to honeybees."

The results suggest current regulations and protocols governing bumblebee imports are not effective. Currently, Natural England licences are only required for the non-native subspecies. Although the licences require colonies to be disease free, colonies arriving in the UK are not screened to ensure compliance and the regulations do not apply to imports of the native subspecies.

The study argues that producers need to improve disease screening and develop a parasite-free diet for their bees, while regulatory authorities need to strengthen measures to prevent importation of parasite-carrying bumblebee colonies, including checking bees on arrival in the UK and extending regulations to cover imported colonies of the native .

As well as increasing the prevalence of parasites in wild bumblebees and managed honeybees near farms using the commercially-produced bumblebees, continuing to import bumblebee colonies that carry parasites is also likely to introduce new species or strains of parasites into some areas, the authors warn.

According to co-author of the study Professor William Hughes of the University of Sussex: "If we don't act, then the risk is that potentially tens of thousands of parasite-carrying bumblebee colonies may be imported into the UK each year, and hundreds of thousands worldwide. Many bee species are already showing significant population declines due to multiple factors. The introduction of more or new parasite infections will at a minimum exacerbate this, and could quite possibly directly drive declines."

Although this is the first study of its kind in the UK, research in North America, South America and Japan suggests that parasites introduced by commercial bumblebees may be a major cause of population declines of several species, including Bombus dahlbomii in Argentina, and Bombus terricola and Bombus pensylvanicus in North America.

Explore further: Rising temperatures can be hard on dogs

More information: Journal of Applied Ecology doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12134

Related Stories

Lonely bees make better guests

Jun 18, 2013

Solitary bees are twice as likely to pollinate the flowers they visit as their more sociable counterparts, according to a new study.

A fecal diet keeps bumblebees healthy

Nov 16, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- New research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science shows that a diet of bumble feces at the start of a bumblebee’s adult life is essential for the protection agains ...

Common eastern bumblebee can boost pumpkin yields

Jul 06, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Each grinning jack-o'-lantern starts with yellow pollen grains, ferried from a male to a female pumpkin flower by bees. Honeybee populations are in decline, but Cornell entomologist Brian ...

Bumblebee re-introduced to UK

Jun 13, 2009

This month, a campaign was launched to re-introduce the short-haired bumblebee to the UK from New Zealand.

Recommended for you

Rising temperatures can be hard on dogs

12 hours ago

The "dog days of summer" are here, but don't let the phrase fool you. This hot time of year can be dangerous for your pup, says a Kansas State University veterinarian.

Monkeys fear big cats less, eat more, with humans around

15 hours ago

Some Monkeys in South Africa have been found to regard field scientists as human shields against predators and why not if the alternative is death by leopard? The researchers found the monkeys felt far safer ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

la7dfa
3 / 5 (2) Jul 18, 2013
I guess we have not learned much since The Conqistadors spread smallpox, chicken pox, diphtheria, typhus, influenza, measles, malaria and yellow fever to The New World?
ccr5Delta32
2.3 / 5 (3) Jul 18, 2013
One of the reasons bees are being imported is to replace collapsed colonies . A bit of a causation loop there .
You are probably right la7dfa but something to bear in mind is the mainly successful lobbing by some of the biggest chemical companies in Europe on the German and Swiss governments to veto any ban on pesticides . It's in their financial interest that it's anything but pesticides to blame . In the absence of real evidential causes of CCD the process of elimination is a good way nail down the real causes .
natello
Jul 18, 2013
This comment has been removed by a moderator.