Do-it-yourself invisibility with 3-D printing

May 06, 2013
This is Yaroslav Urzhumov. Credit: Duke University

Seven years ago, Duke University engineers demonstrated the first working invisibility cloak in complex laboratory experiments. Now it appears creating a simple cloak has become a lot simpler.

"I would argue that essentially anyone who can spend a couple thousand dollars on a non-industry grade 3-D printer can literally make a plastic cloak overnight," said Yaroslav Urzhumov, assistant research professor in electrical and computer engineering at Duke's Pratt School of Engineering.

Three-dimensional printing, technically known as stereolithographic fabrication, has become increasingly popular, not only among industry, but for personal use. It involves a moving nozzle guided by a computer program laying down successive thin layers of a material—usually a —until a three-dimensional object is produced.

Urzhumov said that producing a cloak in this fashion is inexpensive and easy. He and his team made a small one at Duke which looks like a Frisbee™ disc made out of Swiss cheese. Algorithms determined the location, size and shape of the holes to deflect microwave beams. The fabrication process takes from three to seven hours.

The results of Urzhumov's experiments were published online in the journal Optics Letters, and the team's research was supported by the U.S. Army Research Office through a Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative grant.

Just like the 2006 cloak, the newer version deflects microwave beams, but researchers feel confident that in the not-so-distant future, the cloak can work for higher wavelengths, including visible light.

"We believe this approach is a way towards optical cloaking, including visible and infrared," Urzhumov said. "And nanotechnology is available to make these cloaks from transparent polymers or glass. The properties of transparent polymers and glasses are not that different from what we have in our polymer at ."

The disk-like cloak has an open area in its center where the researchers placed an opaque object. When microwave beams were aimed at the object through the side of the disk, the cloak made it appear that the object was not there.

"The design of the cloak eliminates the 'shadow' that would be cast, and suppresses the scattering from the object that would be expected," said Urzhumov. "In effect, the bright, highly reflective object, like a metal cylinder, is made invisible. The microwaves are carefully guided by a thin dielectric shell and then re-radiated back into free space on the shadow side of the ."

Urzhumov said that theoretically, the technique can be used to create much larger devices.

"Computer simulations make me believe that it is possible to create a similar polymer-based cloaking layer as thin as one inch wrapped around a massive object several meters in diameter," he said. "I have run some simulations that seem to confirm this point."

Explore further: Engineers make sound loud enough to bend light on a computer chip

More information: "Thin Low-Loss Dielectric Coatings for Free-Space Cloaking," Y. Urzhumov, et al. Optics Letters. Online May 3, 2013. DOI 10.1364/OL.38.001606

Related Stories

Effortless sailing with fluid flow cloak

Aug 11, 2011

Duke engineers have already shown that they can "cloak" light and sound, making objects invisible -- now, they have demonstrated the theoretical ability to significantly increase the efficiency of ships by tricking the surrounding ...

New invisibility cloak hides objects from human view

Jul 27, 2011

For the first time, scientists have devised an invisibility cloak material that hides objects from detection using light that is visible to humans. The new device is a leap forward in cloaking materials, according to a report ...

Researchers create first 3D invisibility cloak

Aug 11, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Science has taken one more step towards creating a true real-life cloaking device. Assistant Professor Andrea Alůin and his colleagues at the University of Texas at Austin have successfully ...

One size cloaks all

Nov 21, 2012

A metamaterial invisibility cloak that can adapt to hide different sized objects is demonstrated by in Nature Communications this week. The findings represent a useful advance for more practical applications of metamaterial cloaki ...

Invisibility cloak research moves forward at MTU

Mar 25, 2013

(Phys.org) —Michigan Technological University's invisibility cloak researchers have done it again. They've moved the bar on one of the holy grails of physics: making objects invisible. Just last month, ...

Researchers create 3-D invisibility cloak: study

Mar 18, 2010

European researchers have taken the world a step closer to fictional wizard Harry Potter's invisibility cape after they made an object disappear using a three-dimensional "cloak", a study published Thursday in the US-based ...

Recommended for you

User comments : 11

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gwrede
2.7 / 5 (7) May 06, 2013
So, now you can get an invisibility cloak by printing a frisbee in 3D. Wow! I guess I need to buy a 3D printer, too.

Print a car using a 3D printer, and it can fly, or so we are led to believe. Print a doll, and it gets a soul!

Yes, Real Soon Now we will all have Invisibility Cloaks! Whee! (Not that I can imagine what we'd do with them. Except for the criminals.)

My apologies for not being entirely exhilarated, yet.
antialias_physorg
2.9 / 5 (9) May 06, 2013
My apologies for not being entirely exhilarated, yet.

I think you should rather apologize for completely misunderstading the content and impact of the article.
axemaster
5 / 5 (2) May 06, 2013
I imagine one of the first uses for this will be to make radar invisible cars...
gerardo_villarreal1
5 / 5 (5) May 06, 2013
"...researchers feel confident that in the not-so-distant future, the cloak can work for higher wavelengths, including visible light."

I think you meant higher frequencies or lower wavelengths.
EyeNStein
1.8 / 5 (5) May 06, 2013
'to make radar invisible cars'
but you cant see out of the windows for the plastic ball you are encased in.
Huns
3.7 / 5 (3) May 06, 2013
A proof of concept that works only for microwaves? This will be impressive if humanity spontaneously switches to only being able to see in that spectrum. The title makes it sound like you can just print yourself something that's OPTICALLY invisible. The word "invisible" refers to VISIBLE LIGHT. When I can print an OPTICAL invisibility cloak with what... PVC? PLA?... sure, that will be impressive. Something that just bounces radio frequency around in useful ways is not news.
antialias_physorg
2.7 / 5 (3) May 07, 2013
A proof of concept that works only for microwaves?

That it works at all using an off-the-shelf 3D printer is pretty amazing. Until now research (and potential applications) were limited to highly specialized labs/factories. This can make the benefits available for all kinds of uses.
Something that just bounces radio frequency around in useful ways is not news.

It's useful and it's news. Especially science news. If YOU have no use for it then that is the subject for a different site only (your blog or homepage or whatever). But don't pretend like you have even an inkling of knowledge in this area that would allow you to decide what is useful or not.
Huns
1 / 5 (2) May 07, 2013
It's useful and it's news.

The statement "something that just bounces radio frequency around in useful ways is not news" is correct. The technology to do that is decades old. My main issue with this article is that the title says "invisibility" when the object he's holding up is quite visible.
antialias_physorg
3 / 5 (2) May 08, 2013
The statement "something that just bounces radio frequency around in useful ways is not news" is correct.

Well then you missed the point of the article: It doesn't just 'bounce radiowaves around'. It bounces them around in a highly specific manner that was, up until now, reserved for highly specialized/expensive setups. And that has now become available for manufacture by anyone who is willing to buy a 3D printer for a couple bucks. That's a pretty big advancement (and news).
My main issue with this article is that the title says "invisibility" when the object he's holding up is quite visible.

The article is not for you but for somone interested in the field. Anyone who is interested in the field knows how the term 'invisible' is used like in the field (just like stuff can be invisible to sonar, or stealth planes can be invisible to radar - neither of which is in the 390 to 700nm EM range)

As in the dictionary definition: visible: capable of being perceived.
antialias_physorg
1 / 5 (1) May 08, 2013
Sorry for harping on you like this, but lately there's been a lot of posts of people complaining that a word in the article doesn't mean what they think it should mean.

But instead of going to wiki-friggin-pedia and looking it up they insist that their narrow/inapplicable definition is correct and all of science please dumb down/rewrite their articles so that no one, ever, has to get off their lazy butts and learn one more word.

God forbid that people actually LEARN something from reading science articles!
nathj72
1 / 5 (1) May 08, 2013
For those of you that cannot see the use of something like this: The fact that a microwave invisibility cloak can be made using a 3D printer and with only dielectric material (plastic), rather than the traditional combination of dielectric and metallic, is extremely useful. This provides an economical route to hiding objects from rf/microwave radiation that would negatively affect communication or radar systems.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.