Actor Johnny Depp immortalized in ancient fossil find

May 16, 2013
Kooteninchela Deppi

A scientist has discovered an ancient extinct creature with 'scissor hand-like' claws in fossil records and has named it in honour of his favourite movie star.

The 505 million year old fossil called Kooteninchela deppi (pronounced Koo-ten-ee-che-la depp-eye), which is a distant ancestor of lobsters and scorpions, was named after the actor Johnny Depp for his starring role as Edward Scissorhands - a movie about an artificial man named Edward, an unfinished creation, who has scissors for hands.

Kooteninchela deppi is helping researchers to piece together more information about life on Earth during the when nearly all modern animal types emerged.

David Legg, who carried out the research as part of his PhD in the Department of Earth Science and Engineering at Imperial College London, says:

"When I first saw the pair of isolated claws in the of this species I could not help but think of Edward Scissorhands. Even the genus name, Kootenichela, includes the reference to this film as 'chela' is Latin for claws or scissors. In truth, I am also a bit of a Depp fan and so what better way to honour the man than to immortalise him as an ancient creature that once roamed the sea?"

Kooteninchela deppi lived in very shallow seas, similar to modern coastal environments, off the cost of British Columbia in Canada, which was situated much closer to the equator 500 million years ago. The would have been much hotter than it is today and although had not yet been established, Kooteninchela deppi would have lived in a similar environment consisting of sponges.

The researcher believes that Kooteninchela deppi would have been a hunter or scavenger. Its large Edward Scissorhands-like claws with their elongated spines may have been used to capture prey, or they could have helped it to probe the sea floor looking for hiding in sediment.

Kooteninchela deppi was approximately four centimetres long with an elongated trunk for a body and millipede-like legs, which it used to scuttle along the sea floor with the occasional short swim.

It also had large eyes composed of many lenses like the compound eyes of a fly. They were positioned on top of movable stalks called peduncles to help it more easily search for food and look out for predators.

The researcher discovered that Kooteninchela deppi belongs to a group known as the 'great-appendage' arthropods, or megacheirans, which refers to the enlarged pincer-like frontal claws that they share. The 'great-appendage' arthropods are an early relation of arthropods, which includes spiders, scorpions, centipedes, millipedes, insects and crabs.

David Legg adds: "Just imagine it: the prawns covered in mayonnaise in your sandwich, the spider climbing up your wall and even the fly that has been banging into your window and annoyingly flying into your face are all descendants of Kooteninchela deppi. Current estimates indicate that there are more than one million known insects and potentially 10 million more yet to be categorised, which potentially means that Kooteninchela Deppi has a huge family tree."

In the future, David Legg intends to further his research and study fossilised creatures from the Ordovician, the geological period that saw the largest increase in diversity of species on the planet. He hopes to understand why this happened in order to learn more about the current diversity of species on Earth.

Explore further: Violent aftermath for the warriors at Alken Enge

More information: "Multi-segmented arthropods from the middle Cambrian of British Columbia (Canada)" Journal of Palaeontology 2 May 2013

Related Stories

Origin of claws seen in 390-million-year-old fossil

Feb 05, 2009

A missing link in the evolution of the front claw of living scorpions and horseshoe crabs was identified with the discovery of a 390 million-year-old fossil by researchers at Yale and the University of Bonn, ...

Ancient harvestmen revealed in 3-D models

Aug 23, 2011

Two ancient types of harvestmen, or 'daddy long legs,' which skittered around forests more than 300 million years ago, are revealed in new three-dimensional virtual fossil models published today in the journal ...

Recommended for you

Violent aftermath for the warriors at Alken Enge

Jul 29, 2014

Denmark attracted international attention in 2012 when archaeological excavations revealed the bones of an entire army, whose warriors had been thrown into the bogs near the Alken Enge wetlands in East Jutland ...

Dinosaurs doing well before asteroid impact

Jul 29, 2014

A new analysis of fossils from the last years of the dinosaurs concludes that extra-terrestrial impact was likely the sole cause of extinction in most cases.

A word in your ear, but make it snappy

Jul 28, 2014

To most, crocodiles conjure images of sharp teeth, powerful jaws and ferocious, predatory displays – but they are certainly not famous for their hearing abilities. However, this could all change, as new ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

SolidRecovery
1.3 / 5 (6) May 16, 2013
They didn't mention the size of it and there is no scale on the picture. It's hard to tell whether or not I should be scared of this creature.
m8a8r8k
5 / 5 (1) May 16, 2013
Don't be scared. "Kooteninchela deppi was approximately four centimetres long"
SolidRecovery
1.7 / 5 (6) May 16, 2013
Don't be scared. "Kooteninchela deppi was approximately four centimetres long"

Thank you, and that's why I shouldn't skim through so many articles.
Lurker2358
1.6 / 5 (7) May 16, 2013
There should be some sort of rule that says names of new species should actually be descriptive or unique.

Like "Cat" or "Dog" may not be descriptive outside their own definitions, but the terms are unique so they work as labels.

You know, we don't need animals named after famous people, especially people who are famous for irrational reasons.
jsdarkdestruction
3 / 5 (4) May 16, 2013
"Kooteninchela deppi" In 1000 years I doubt anyone will remember this name was chosen after jonny depp.
seilgu
5 / 5 (2) May 17, 2013
It's very disturbing to see so many new species named after some irrelevant actor or singers..
Sinister1811
2.1 / 5 (7) May 17, 2013
How disappointing that they name these new discoveries after people who not only had nothing to do with the discoveries, but have no real interest in the field.
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (3) May 18, 2013
It's very disturbing to see so many new species named after some irrelevant actor or singers..

It's just a label. For all the scientists care it could have been named XY33542985-bdg.

Just as Feynman says: you can know the names of all the bird in the world - but that still doesn't mean you know anything about birds.

So don't get hung up over whether something gets this name or that. It doesn't mean diddly-squat. It's just a fun thing to do for a scientist (and they ARE allowed to have fun on the job).