Wastewater injection spurred biggest earthquake yet, study finds

Mar 26, 2013
A 2011 magnitude 5.7 quake near Prague, Okla., apparently triggered by wastewater injection, buckled U.S. Highway 62. Credit: (ohn Leeman

A new study in the journal Geology is the latest to tie a string of unusual earthquakes, in this case, in central Oklahoma, to the injection of wastewater deep underground. Researchers now say that the magnitude 5.7 earthquake near Prague, Okla., on Nov. 6, 2011, may also be the largest ever linked to wastewater injection. Felt as far off as Milwaukee, more than 800 miles away, the quake—the biggest ever recorded in Oklahoma—destroyed 14 homes, buckled a federal highway and left two people injured. Small earthquakes continue to be recorded in the area. The study appeared today in the journal's early online edition.

The recent boom in U.S. has produced massive amounts of wastewater. The water is used both in hydrofracking, which cracks open rocks to release natural gas, and in coaxing petroleum out of wells. In both cases, the brine and chemical-laced water has to be disposed of, often by injecting it back underground elsewhere, where it has the potential to trigger earthquakes. The water linked to the Prague quakes was a of at one set of oil wells, and was pumped into another set of depleted oil wells targeted for .

Scientists have linked a rising number of quakes in normally calm parts of Arkansas, Texas, Ohio and Colorado to below-ground injection. In the last four years, the number of quakes in the middle of the United States jumped 11-fold from the three decades prior, the authors of the Geology study estimate. Last year, a group at the U.S. Geological Survey also attributed a remarkable rise in small- to mid-size quakes in the region to humans. The risk is serious enough that the , in a report last year called for further research to "understand, limit and respond" to induced seismic events. Despite these studies, wastewater injection continues near the Oklahoma earthquakes.

The magnitude 5.7 quake near Prague was preceded by a 5.0 shock and followed by thousands of aftershocks. What made the swarm unusual is that wastewater had been pumped into abandoned oil wells nearby for 17 years without incident. In the study, researchers hypothesize that as wastewater replenished compartments once filled with oil, the pressure to keep the fluid going down had to be ratcheted up. As pressure built up, a known fault—known to geologists as the Wilzetta fault—jumped. "When you overpressure the fault, you reduce the stress that's pinning the fault into place and that's when earthquakes happen," said study coauthor Heather Savage, a geophysicist at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory.

The amount of wastewater injected into the well was relatively small, yet it triggered a cascading series of tremors that led to the main shock, said study co-author Geoffrey Abers, also a seismologist at Lamont-Doherty. "There's something important about getting unexpectedly large earthquakes out of small systems that we have discovered here," he said. The observations mean that "the risk of humans inducing large earthquakes from even small injection activities is probably higher" than previously thought, he said.

Hours after the first magnitude 5.0 quake on Nov. 5, 2011, University of Oklahoma seismologist Katie Keranen rushed to install the first three of several dozen seismographs to record aftershocks. That night, on Nov. 6, the magnitude 5.7 main shock hit and Keranen watched as her house began to shake for what she said felt like 20 seconds. "It was clearly a significant event," said Keranen, the Geology study's lead author. "I gathered more equipment, more students, and headed to the field the next morning to deploy more stations."

University of Oklahoma seismologist Katie Keranen (left) and Oklahoma State University geophysicist Estella Atekwana install a seismometer following a series of earlier quakes. Credit: Shannon Dulin

Keranen's recordings of the magnitude 5.7 quake, and the aftershocks that followed, showed that the first Wilzetta fault rupture was no more than 650 feet from active injection wells and perhaps much closer, in the same sedimentary rocks, the study says. Further, wellhead records showed that after 13 years of pumping at zero to low pressure, injection pressure rose more than 10-fold from 2001 to 2006, the study says.

The Oklahoma Geological Survey has yet to issue an official account of the sequence, and wastewater injection at the site continues. In a statement responding to the paper, Survey seismologist Austin Holland said the study showed the earthquake sequence could have been triggered by the injections. But, he said, "it is still the opinion of those at the Oklahoma Geological Survey that these earthquakes could be naturally occurring. There remain many open questions, and more scientific investigations are underway on this sequence of earthquakes and many others within the state of Oklahoma."

The risk of setting off earthquakes by injecting fluid underground has been known since at least the 1960s, when injection at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal near Denver was suspended after a quake estimated at magnitude 4.8 or greater struck nearby—the largest tied to wastewater disposal until the one near Prague, Okla. A series of similar incidents have emerged recently. University of Memphis seismologist Stephen Horton in a study last year linked a rise in earthquakes in north-central Arkansas to nearby injection wells. University of Texas, Austin, seismologist Cliff Frohlich in a 2011 study tied earthquake swarms at the Dallas-Fort Worth Airport to a brine disposal well a third of a mile away. In Ohio, Lamont-Doherty seismologists Won-Young Kim and John Armbruster traced a series of 2011 earthquakes near Youngstown to a nearby disposal well. That well has since been shut down, and Ohio has tightened its waste-injection rules.

Wastewater injection is not the only way that people can touch off quakes. Evidence suggests that geothermal drilling, impoundment of water behind dams, enhanced oil recovery, solution salt mining and rock quarrying also can trigger . (Hydrofracking itself is not implicated in significant earthquakes; the amount of water used is usually not enough to produce substantial shaking.) The largest known earthquakes attributed to humans may be the two magnitude 7.0 events that shook the Gazli gas fields of Soviet Uzbekistan in 1976, followed by a third magnitude 7.0 eight years later. In a 1985 study in the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Lamont-Doherty researchers David Simpson and William Leith hypothesized that the quakes were human-induced but noted that a lack of information prevented them from linking the events to gas production or other triggers. In 2009, a geothermal energy project in Basel, Switzerland, was canceled after development activities apparently led to a series of quakes of up to magnitude 3.4 that caused some $8 million in damage to surrounding properties.

In many of the injection cases documented so far, earthquakes followed within days or months of fluid injection starting. In contrast, the Oklahoma swarm happened years after injection began, similar to swarms at the Cogdell oil field in West Texas and the Fort St. John area of British Columbia.

The Wilzetta fault system remains under stress, the study's authors say, yet regulators continue to allow injection into nearby wells. Ideally, injection should be kept away from known faults and companies should be required to provide detailed records of how much fluid they are pumping underground and at what pressure, said Keranen. The study authors also recommend sub-surface monitoring of fluid pressure for warning signs. Further research is needed but at a minimum, "there should be careful monitoring in regions where you have injection wells and protocols for stopping pumping even when small earthquakes are detected," said Abers. In a recent op-ed in the Albany (N.Y.) Times Union, Abers argued that New York should consider the risk of induced earthquakes from fluid in weighing whether to allow hydraulic fracturing to extract the state's shale gas reserves.

Explore further: Magnitude-7.2 earthquake shakes Mexican capital

Related Stories

Expert: Wastewater well in Ohio triggered quakes

Jan 03, 2012

A northeast Ohio well used to dispose of wastewater from oil and gas drilling almost certainly caused a series of 11 minor quakes in the Youngstown area since last spring, a seismologist investigating the quakes said Monday.

Ohio quakes could incite fracking policy shift

Jan 03, 2012

(AP) -- In Ohio, geographically and politically positioned to become a leading importer of wastewater from gas drilling, environmentalists and lawmakers opposed to the technique known as fracking are seizing on a series ...

Recommended for you

Magnitude-7.2 earthquake shakes Mexican capital

Apr 18, 2014

A powerful magnitude-7.2 earthquake shook central and southern Mexico on Friday, sending panicked people into the streets. Some walls cracked and fell, but there were no reports of major damage or casualties.

User comments : 13

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

repudiator
3.2 / 5 (11) Mar 26, 2013
Ah, is there more than the author's opinion to base the assertions on? If so where is the data, including the uncertainty statistics?
Sean_W
2.8 / 5 (13) Mar 26, 2013
Ah, is there more than the author's opinion to base the assertions on? If so where is the data, including the uncertainty statistics?


That's not how we do science anymore. We pronounce links. And a link has clearly been pronounced. Don't be a denier.
omatwankr
2.3 / 5 (15) Mar 26, 2013
Lets see, one of these should cover it
Earthquakes changed before
It's the sun"
Animals and plants can adapt
It hasn't quaked since 1998
It's cosmic rays
1934 - shakiest year on record
Mars has mars-quakes
It's a 1500 year cycle
Earthquakes are what plant crave
There's no empirical evidence
Earthquakes was higher in the past
Scientists can't even predict Earthquakes
It's the ocean
Greenland ice sheet won't collapse due to Earthquakes
Solar Cycle Length proves its the sun
Mauna Loa is a volcano
Turrets syndrome
ValeriaT
1.7 / 5 (6) Mar 26, 2013
was pumped into another set of depleted oil wells targeted for waste storage
In another words, it was just a hit-and-miss affair, that this earthquake wasn't caused with hydrofracing directly. Maybe it actually was a live production well - but the mining company doesn't want to admit it openly for not to raise the resistance of publics against hydrofracing as such. BTW I'm living in original Prague - it seems a large Czech community comes from Ohio...
VendicarE
3.8 / 5 (10) Mar 26, 2013
Stupidity produces it's own punishment.

I love it.
ScooterG
1.7 / 5 (12) Mar 26, 2013
"Further, wellhead records showed that after 13 years of pumping at zero to low pressure, injection pressure rose more than 10-fold from 2001 to 2006, the study says."

Rose to what pressure? 10" WC? 100psi? 10,000psi?

Not much info here for having been studied for 1.5 years.
Jotaf
4 / 5 (4) Mar 26, 2013
Mr. Scooter, don't confuse the pop news article with the research paper. I don't know how many times this has to be repeated.
Jayman
1.5 / 5 (8) Mar 27, 2013
Some things don't sound right. This is certainly one of them. You have to take this "research" with a pinch of salt.
Tomator
1.8 / 5 (5) Mar 27, 2013
If there was no energy stored in the fault, there would be no eartquake. If there was energy but no earthuake, the stress wa not enough to start the distaster byt the stress was probably building up. So, the water injection led to release the energy earlier. Instead we could wait until more energy is released with greater, naturally triggered, catastrophic disaster occur.
alq131
2 / 5 (4) Mar 27, 2013
@tomator,
Could actually be a good thing. Pump water into active faults as a lubricant to keep the fault moving and prevent the big build up of stresses that cause the huge quakes. A team swoops in after a big quake (so as not to be blamed for it) starts drilling and pumping. California could be the leader in a new industry.
Cursed
5 / 5 (3) Mar 27, 2013
I understand the point about releasing pressure before a larger event would occur, but does anybody else think it is unsafe to be fracking so close to a supervolcano?
PhyOrgSux
1 / 5 (5) Mar 27, 2013
They should pour in a jello mix instead of just water...it would absorb some of the energy;-)
rayalf
1 / 5 (1) Mar 31, 2013
If there were no risk why in the 1960's did the military stop waste water injection around the Rocky Mountain Arsenal near Denver?

More news stories

China says massive area of its soil polluted

A huge area of China's soil covering more than twice the size of Spain is estimated to be polluted, the government said Thursday, announcing findings of a survey previously kept secret.

UN weather agency warns of 'El Nino' this year

The UN weather agency Tuesday warned there was a good chance of an "El Nino" climate phenomenon in the Pacific Ocean this year, bringing droughts and heavy rainfall to the rest of the world.

NASA's space station Robonaut finally getting legs

Robonaut, the first out-of-this-world humanoid, is finally getting its space legs. For three years, Robonaut has had to manage from the waist up. This new pair of legs means the experimental robot—now stuck ...

Ex-Apple chief plans mobile phone for India

Former Apple chief executive John Sculley, whose marketing skills helped bring the personal computer to desktops worldwide, says he plans to launch a mobile phone in India to exploit its still largely untapped ...

Filipino tests negative for Middle East virus

A Filipino nurse who tested positive for the Middle East virus has been found free of infection in a subsequent examination after he returned home, Philippine health officials said Saturday.

Egypt archaeologists find ancient writer's tomb

Egypt's minister of antiquities says a team of Spanish archaeologists has discovered two tombs in the southern part of the country, one of them belonging to a writer and containing a trove of artifacts including reed pens ...