New dinosaur fossil challenges bird evolution theory

Jan 24, 2013
This is a reconstruction of Eosinopteryx. Credit: Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences

(Phys.org)—The discovery of a new bird-like dinosaur from the Jurassic period challenges widely accepted theories on the origin of flight.

Co-authored by Dr Gareth Dyke, Senior Lecturer in Vertebrate Palaeontology at the University of Southampton, the paper describes a new feathered dinosaur about 30 cm in length which pre-dates bird-like dinosaurs that birds were long thought to have evolved from.

Over many years, it has become accepted among palaeontologists that birds evolved from a group of dinosaurs called theropods from the Early Cretaceous period of Earth's history, around 120-130 million years ago. Recent discoveries of from the older Middle-Late have reinforced this theory.

The new 'bird-dinosaur' Eosinopteryx described in Nature Communications this week provides additional evidence to this effect.

"This discovery sheds further doubt on the theory that the famous fossil – or "first bird" as it is sometimes referred to – was pivotal in the evolution of modern birds," says Dr Dyke, who is based at the National Oceanography Centre, Southampton.

"Our findings suggest that the origin of flight was much more complex than previously thought."

The fossilised remains found in north-eastern China indicate that, while feathered, this was a flightless dinosaur, because of its small and a that would have restricted its ability to flap its wings.

The dinosaur also had toes suited to walking along the ground and fewer feathers on its tail and lower legs, which would have made it easier to run.

Explore further: New branch added to European family tree

More information: www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/… full/ncomms2389.html

Related Stories

Feathers too weak for early bird flight

May 13, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- The evolution of flight took longer than previously thought with the ancestors of modern birds “rubbish” at flying, if they flew at all, according to a Manchester scientist.

Archaeopteryx and the dinosaur-bird family tree

Sep 15, 2011

The magpie-sized Archaeopteryx had bird and dinosaur features and helped show that birds evolved from dinosaurs. However, recent research in the journal Nature questions its position in the dinosaur-bird family ...

Dinosaur shook tail feathers for mating show

Jan 16, 2013

(Phys.org)—A University of Alberta researcher's examination of fossilized dinosaur tail bones has led to a breakthrough finding: some feathered dinosaurs used tail plumage to attract mates, much like modern-day ...

Early birds had an old-school version of wings

Nov 21, 2012

In comparison to modern birds, the prehistoric Archaeopteryx and bird-like dinosaurs before them had a more primitive version of a wing. The findings, reported on November 21 in Current Biology, lend support ...

Recommended for you

New hadrosaur noses into spotlight

7 hours ago

Call it the Jimmy Durante of dinosaurs – a newly discovered hadrosaur with a truly distinctive nasal profile. The new dinosaur, named Rhinorex condrupus by paleontologists from North Carolina State Univer ...

Militants threaten ancient sites in Iraq, Syria

14 hours ago

For more than 5,000 years, numerous civilizations have left their mark on upper Mesopotamia—from Assyrians and Akkadians to Babylonians and Romans. Their ancient, buried cities, palaces and temples packed ...

New branch added to European family tree

Sep 17, 2014

The setting: Europe, about 7,500 years ago. Agriculture was sweeping in from the Near East, bringing early farmers into contact with hunter-gatherers who had already been living in Europe for tens of thousands ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

C_elegans
5 / 5 (2) Jan 24, 2013
What? Archaeopteryx could have evolved from this "warm" species, no?
Why wouldn't feathers have evolved before flight? I'm missing something.

-elegans
evolution3
5 / 5 (2) Jan 25, 2013
Oh my...the title is a bit misleading isn't it?It maybe change how the evolution of flight worked...or maybe not.There was an article around a short time ago, which said that Archaeopteryx was bad at flying.So why exactly is it a problem, that this feathered dinosaur was supposedly flightless?
PJS
5 / 5 (2) Jan 25, 2013
just because Archaeopteryx may not have been the first feathered dinosaur doesn't mean it wasn't pivotal in the evolution of flight. in fact, ALL feathered dinosaurs were pivotal to the evolution of flight. duh
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
5 / 5 (1) Jan 25, 2013
Agree with PJS. Archaeopteryx was later, but shows how the clades around what was to become the surviving birds were birds of a feather flocking together.