Unraveling the mysteries of exotic superconductors

Jun 25, 2012
Unraveling the mysteries of exotic superconductors
Scientists at the US Department of Energy's Ames Laboratory are using specialized techniques to help unravel the mysteries of iron-based superconductors. As part of an international collaboration, (from left) Kiyul Cho, Ruslan Prozorov and Makariy Tanatar found that magnetism may be helping or even responsible for superconductivity in iron-based superconductors. Credit: Ames Laboratory -- USDOE

In traditional electrical lines, a significant amount of energy is lost while the energy travels from its source to homes and businesses due to resistance. Superconductors, materials that when cooled have zero electric resistance, have the promise of someday increasing the efficiency of power distribution, but more must still be learned about superconductors before they can be widely used for that purpose.

Scientists at the U.S. Department of Energy's Ames Laboratory are using specialized techniques to help unravel the mysteries of a new type superconductor that was discovered in 2008. Ames Lab physicists were part of an international collaboration that also included scientists at Kyoto University in Japan, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and University of Bristol in the United Kingdom to study the materials.

The group found that magnetism may be helping or even responsible for in iron-based . The results were published in the June 22 issue of Science.

"The first step in designing superconductors for new technologies that will help save energy is better understanding of how superconductors work," says Ruslan Prozorov, who led the team at Ames Lab that also included Kiyul Cho and Makariy Tanatar.

Unfortunately, most conventional measurements of material parameters, such as resistivity, aren't useful in the state of superconductivity. But Prozorov several years ago helped developed a technique to measure how far the field penetrates into a superconductor. This length is called the London penetration depth, and it reveals basic information about a material, even in the .

"London penetration depth is one of the few quantities we can measure in a superconducting state to learn more about what's going on, so the technique we specialize in here at Ames Laboratory was particularly useful for this research project," said Prozorov, who is also an associate professor of physics and astronomy at Iowa State University. "In this collaboration, we studied a barium-iron-arsenic-phosphorus material at near zero Kelvin, and our London penetration depth measurements suggested that magnetism is responsible for superconductivity in iron-based superconductors. Typically, magnetism is detrimental to superconductivity, but when it is weakened enough, it might actually be helping."

The international team's research helps answer one of the central questions about how iron-based superconductors work.

"Iron-based superconductors may open the door to new energy technologies," said Prozorov. "But we'll only get there through materials science and understanding the mechanism of superconductivity in these new iron-based materials."

Explore further: Physicists unlock nature of high-temperature superconductivity

Related Stories

Iron-arsenic superconductors in class of their own

Apr 29, 2009

Physicists at the U.S. Department of Energy's Ames Laboratory have experimentally demonstrated that the superconductivity mechanism in the recently-discovered iron-arsenide superconductors is unique compared to all other ...

Secrets behind high temperature superconductors revealed

Feb 22, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Scientists from Queen Mary, University of London and the University of Fribourg (Switzerland) have found evidence that magnetism is involved in the mechanism behind high temperature superconductivity.

Stripes offer clues to superconductivity

May 17, 2010

New images of iron-based superconductors are providing telltale clues to the origin of superconductivity in a class of ceramic materials known as pnictides. The images reveal that electrons responsible for ...

Recommended for you

Mapping the optimal route between two quantum states

6 hours ago

As a quantum state collapses from a quantum superposition to a classical state or a different superposition, it will follow a path known as a quantum trajectory. For each start and end state there is an optimal ...

Spin-based electronics: New material successfully tested

10 hours ago

Spintronics is an emerging field of electronics, where devices work by manipulating the spin of electrons rather than the current generated by their motion. This field can offer significant advantages to computer technology. ...

Verifying the future of quantum computing

12 hours ago

Physicists are one step closer to proving the reliability of a quantum computer – a machine which promises to revolutionise the way we trade over the internet and provide new tools to perform powerful simulations.

A transistor-like amplifier for single photons

Jul 29, 2014

Data transmission over long distances usually utilizes optical techniques via glass fibres – this ensures high speed transmission combined with low power dissipation of the signal. For quite some years ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3.7 / 5 (3) Jun 25, 2012
This article is interesting but the presentation is short on details. In addition to the June 2012 article available as reported above, there is an article published 22 September 2011 by Prozorov and Kogan available publicly on the web entitled "London Penetration Depth in Iron-Based Superconductors." Plenty of info available there. Cho and Tanatar were also on that team.
5 / 5 (1) Jun 26, 2012
Found the abstract. But unfortunately the paper is pay only
1 / 5 (2) Jun 27, 2012
This is good research, and it seems consistent with other research on pnictide superconductivity, to the effect that magnetism is "responsible for superconductivity" (or at least helpful)in the pnictides. (The why? part remains unclear.) I think the second part of the statement deserves some discussion: "...when [magnetism] is weakened enough, it might actually be helping."

I see it a little differently. At low temperatures, everything else is subdued or suppressed as well. So the "weakened" magnetism might be relatively more influential than the forces
that prevailed in the self-organization of the material at points above the transition temperature. Greater relative strength and range of influence might be the key details, not the diminished absolute strength of the magnetic force per se.

The fact that superconductivity arises in iron based materials implies, as a matter of common sense, that magnetism must be beneficial as to pnictide superconductivity.