Researchers outline ways to advance scientific thinking in children

Aug 18, 2011

Science educators aim to nurture, enrich and sustain children's natural and spontaneous interest in scientific knowledge using many different approaches. In a new paper published in "Science," Carnegie Mellon University's David Klahr and Jamie Jirout and Illinois State University's Corinne Zimmerman use psychology research to outline ways to advance the science of science instruction.

"Instead of looking at this issue from a education perspective, we looked at it from a cognitive and perspective," said Klahr, the Walter van Dyke Bingham Professor of and Education Sciences at CMU. "And from our point of view, it's clear that you can't understand how to teach unless you understand how children learn."

For the paper, Klahr and his colleagues reviewed literature on the early development of scientific thinking and then focused on recent research on how to best teach science to children from preschool to middle school. They characterized scientific thinking in terms of two features: content, which includes an array of domain-specific topics such as feedback; and processes, including formulation of hypotheses and designing experiments.

"When you're looking at how children should be taught, the instructional methods should be consistent with their ," Klahr said. "Children can get lost with too much open-ended instruction with too little structure. On the other hand, too much structure can get boring. There needs to be a between both."

Another problem Klahr and his team identified was in the way science educators classify their classroom instruction using global terms that are not clearly defined and therefore not uniformly used. The research team introduced a method for clearly describing the type of instruction used that covers aspect, materials, goal setting, physical manipulation of materials by child, design of each experiment, probe questions, explanations, summary, execution of experiments and observation of outcomes.

"Instruction labels don't matter — it's what actually happened in the classroom that matters," Klahr said. "Using clear descriptive explanations of what happens in the classroom are the only way to make advances in science education."

The team also advocates for increased use of intelligent tutors in science education. An example given is TED, which has successfully helped children learn how to design experiments. The tutor looks at mistakes that are made and asks questions to train the on how to create a solid experiment.

Explore further: Newlyweds, be careful what you wish for

Related Stories

For 4-year-olds, interactions with teacher key to gains

Sep 15, 2010

Pre-kindergartners who spend much of their classroom day engaged in so-called free-choice play with little input from teachers make smaller gains in early language and math skills than children who receive input from teachers ...

Teaching science: Is discovery better than telling?

Feb 16, 2009

Western Michigan University researchers have discovered that in the academic debate over whether young science students learn more through experimenting or direct instruction, there's little difference.

Recommended for you

Study finds law dramatically curbing need for speed

11 hours ago

Almost seven years have passed since Ontario's street-racing legislation hit the books and, according to one Western researcher, it has succeeded in putting the brakes on the number of convictions and, more importantly, injuries ...

Newlyweds, be careful what you wish for

Apr 17, 2014

A statistical analysis of the gift "fulfillments" at several hundred online wedding gift registries suggests that wedding guests are caught between a rock and a hard place when it comes to buying an appropriate gift for the ...

Can new understanding avert tragedy?

Apr 17, 2014

As a boy growing up in Syracuse, NY, Sol Hsiang ran an experiment for a school project testing whether plants grow better sprinkled with water vs orange juice. Today, 20 years later, he applies complex statistical ...

Creative activities outside work can improve job performance

Apr 16, 2014

Employees who pursue creative activities outside of work may find that these activities boost their performance on the job, according to a new study by San Francisco State University organizational psychologist Kevin Eschleman ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Nanobanano
5 / 5 (1) Aug 18, 2011
No, no no. That can't be what we need.

We need more football and sports entertainment and "wrastling", 'cause those choreographed fake take-downs and submissions are just so entertaining and educational.
ArtflDgr
1 / 5 (1) Aug 18, 2011
no what we need is a way for those interested to do something with the ideas they have and so on... what good is always hammering away that you want more X, when there is not much doing with what they produce.

if something happens to the ideas that they produce, they will come... just as the people line up around the block to get a chance at American idol (say what you may about its value or not), because at its core, its a chance to do something with what you have.

the system couldnt handle an increase of them, and those that wanted to be a part, and there wasnt room for, tended to go someplace else, and would contribute from a autodidactic means. but how? easier to sell a combination nuclear powered potato peeler that's green, than have someone understand the solution to a problem that we want but dont have (but for that presentation).

how many out of work researchers, and other applied sciences people that think up solutions?

how many have?
hush1
not rated yet Aug 18, 2011
"And from our point of view, it's clear that you can't understand how to teach unless you understand how children learn." - Carnegie Mellon University's David Klahr and Jamie Jirout and Illinois State University's Corinne Zimmerman

lol. Well, I insisted that my children never forget their first learning experience and how the experience occurred.
Of course, they forgot. And accused me of not being able to remember how and why I took my first breath of birth.
How can I forget the single, most important learning experience one will ever experience?, they ask.
There is always a chance I will remember learning again.
Isaacsname
5 / 5 (2) Aug 18, 2011
Need more passionate teachers. That was the only thing that kept my interest in a subject growing up, a good teacher.
Dug
5 / 5 (2) Aug 18, 2011
Whatever the methods being used to teach science up to K12 - they are totally inadequate - in spite of the constant flow of education theory (often contradictory) teachers are bombarded with. In the state college I'm associated with in FL (ranked #2 in the nation) the students we get from the high school systems that precede us - are clueless as to what constitutes the scientific method. We are now required to provide remedial scientific method content in all science courses at all levels. Why students aren't taught and required to master and actually employ the scientific method before junior high is a mystery to our faculty.

More news stories

Study finds law dramatically curbing need for speed

Almost seven years have passed since Ontario's street-racing legislation hit the books and, according to one Western researcher, it has succeeded in putting the brakes on the number of convictions and, more importantly, injuries ...

Treating depression in Parkinson's patients

A group of scientists from the University of Kentucky College of Medicine and the Sanders-Brown Center on Aging has found interesting new information in a study on depression and neuropsychological function in Parkinson's ...