Microsoft may have found unlikely cash cow: Android

Jul 13, 2011 By Sharon Pian Chan

In the hunt for the next billion-dollar business, Microsoft Corp. may have discovered one in mobile software. It costs Microsoft nothing to produce and sell, and it's not Windows Phone.

It's , the wildly popular - and free - mobile-phone software made by competitor Google Inc.

In the past nine months, has gone after a handful of companies that make Android phones and tablets.

It has either sued or persuaded the companies to pay it license fees for some technologies found in certain Android features. Microsoft contends it has patents on those technologies.

Four companies in the past few weeks said they will pay licensing fees to Microsoft for selling tablets and phones that run on Android.

HTC Corp., a major Taiwanese smartphone maker, entered into a licensing agreement in April to pay Microsoft a reported $5 per Android phone

Microsoft has begun talking to Co., the world's largest maker of Android phones, about a licensing agreement, Reuters reported recently, citing South Korean media reports.

Microsoft, Google and Samsung declined to comment for this story.

But Brad Smith, Microsoft's chief attorney, addressed the issue in a wide-ranging discussion with reporters in June. Asked whether Android is a new business for Microsoft, Smith said, "We've been open that we're happy to enter into a " with companies that make Android devices.

Asked about a Citi analyst report that was paying Microsoft $5 per Android phone, Smith said, "That seems like a fair price." He said $5 is less than how much Microsoft charges for each license.

"At Microsoft, we stand behind our products and customers," Smith said. "Google says it stands behind its products, but some days they stand so far behind, I'm not sure anyone can see them."

If Microsoft managed to get all Android phone and tablet makers to cough up $5 per device, Microsoft could make more than $913 million a year, using Google's figure of 500,000 new devices per day.

At Microsoft, any business that can bring in $1 billion annually is significant. In fiscal 2010, the Entertainment and Devices division, which includes the Xbox business and mobile software, made $8.1 billion in sales and $679 million in operating profit.

Google has said its mobile business, including search, advertising and services, is a $1 billion enterprise. The company gives away Android, but it sells deals to phone and tablet makers who want exclusive rights to offer the latest software for a limited period.

Android is the world's fastest-growing mobile operating system. Google said 100 million people are using Android devices and, by year's end, it's projected to have 40 percent of the worldwide smartphone market, according to Framingham, Mass. research firm IDC.

Nokia Corp.'s Symbian software, which topped the market for a long spell, is expected to shrink to 21 percent; Apple will maintain a share of 16 percent, and Research in Motion Ltd.'s BlackBerry will slip to 15 percent.

Microsoft's share, which includes both Windows Phone and its older Windows Mobile software, will grow slightly to 6 percent. Analysts think Microsoft has the potential for faster growth in the next few years because of a partnership with Nokia that makes Windows Phone the primary software for phones Nokia says it will start selling in the fourth quarter.

Tablet and phone makers flocked to Google because Android is a royalty-free alternative to Apple's iPhone and iPad software (Apple does not license its software to other companies, in any case). Android was more technologically advanced than Microsoft's previous phone software, Windows Mobile.

Microsoft has yet to develop an operating system designed specifically for tablets. It said it is building its next operating system, Windows 8, to run tablets and traditional PCs. That system is expected to be finished between October 2011 and 2012.

In October 2010, Microsoft launched the first volley at Android, suing Motorola Mobility Inc. in U.S. District Court of Western Washington and complaining to the International Trade Commission. Microsoft claims Motorola's Droid phones, which use the Android platform, infringe on nine of Microsoft's patents.

In November, Motorola countersued Microsoft in federal courts in California and Florida, saying Windows 7, Windows Vista, Windows Phone 7, Hotmail and Exchange Server software infringe on its patents.

Microsoft also sued Barnes & Noble Inc. in U.S. District Court in Western Washington over its Nook e-reader, claiming the book giant copied Microsoft's intellectual property as well. The Nook runs on Android.

Smaller companies Onkyo, Velocity Micro, General Dynamics Itronix and Wistron said in the past three weeks they will pay Microsoft license fees for devices they sell that run on Android.

Microsoft could potentially target many other companies with Android devices, including Dell, Sony, Sony Ericsson, Asus, Acer, LG and Toshiba.

One company is absent from Microsoft's cross hairs: Google.

Law professor Mark Lemley said large companies in the IT industry normally avoid suing each other directly.

"It's kind of like in the Cold War, this idea of mutually assured destruction," he said. "You have the power to take me out of the market and I have the power to take you out of the market, so why should either of us exercise that power?"

Lemley, the William H. Neukom professor at Stanford University, has represented Google's book-search business, but not its business. He said it's not unusual for companies to sue each other's customers.

"What's interesting about litigation is that we're seeing that traditional detente in the IT industry breaks down," he said. "It's because companies are aggressively jockeying for market share, and nobody really knows how the market is going to shake out."

He said the lawsuits could stifle innovation; that happened during the early days of the aviation and radio industry.

Colleen Chien, a patent-law professor at Santa Clara University Law School in California, said Microsoft has become much more aggressive about intellectual property.

Microsoft and , along with other companies, recently bid against each other for a set of Nortel mobile-technology patents. Microsoft's consortium won.

"They're fighting over patents in the courtroom, and in the auction house, and for the customer in the marketplace," Chien said.

Explore further: NBCUniversal settles with unpaid interns for $6.4M

5 /5 (1 vote)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Microsoft reaches licensing deal on HTC phones

Apr 28, 2010

(AP) -- Microsoft Corp. says it has patents covering phones that use Google Inc.'s Android software - but unlike Apple Inc., Microsoft has reached a licensing deal rather than suing over the software.

Microsoft says Android e-reader violates patents

Mar 21, 2011

Microsoft on Monday accused Taiwan electronics colossus Foxconn and US book seller Barnes & Noble of using its patented technology in e-readers running on Google-backed Android software.

Recommended for you

NBCUniversal settles with unpaid interns for $6.4M

3 hours ago

NBCUniversal will pay $6.4 million to settle a class action lawsuit brought by unpaid interns who worked on "Saturday Night Live" and other shows who claim they are owed wages, according to court documents.

States ascend into the cloud

4 hours ago

Seven years ago, the state of Delaware started moving computer servers out of closets and from under workers' desks to create a consolidated data center and a virtual computing climate.

Microsoft drops Nokia name from smartphones

6 hours ago

Microsoft said Friday it was dropping the Nokia name from its Lumia smartphones, rebranding following the acquisition earlier this year of the Finnish group's handset division.

Amazon's loss makes holidays a question mark

6 hours ago

Amazon's trademark smile icon is becoming more of a grimace. The world's largest online retailer reported a wider third-quarter loss than analysts expected and gave a disappointing holiday forecast.

Ericsson profit down 10 pct despite higher sales

11 hours ago

Wireless equipment maker Ericsson says its third-quarter earnings slumped 10 percent despite higher sales due to increased operating costs and negative effects from currency hedging.

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gmurphy
1 / 5 (2) Jul 14, 2011
This is a protection racket. Microsoft will not publicly disclose the patents in question, that's their only 'innovation' in the process. They failed miserably to produce a viable mobile product themselves and instead leach off the industry of others. They're nothing more than a parasite, grrr.
kevinrtrs
1 / 5 (1) Jul 14, 2011
Must admit it sticks out a mile that there's no mention of what companies are getting sued for.
This is more than underhanded, it's extortion, because it allows MS to creep up to Android customers with a totally unknown charge, keeping their lawyers off guard and fueling the fear-of-the-unknown factor. Totally despicable. Even if I do have shares in the company.
Cave_Man
5 / 5 (2) Jul 14, 2011
I like windows phone alot better than android. It seems anyone who uses a device, apple android or whatever simply says the ones they are not using sucks. Well, ive had a chance to use all three and i personally like the feel of windows phone 6 over the iphone os and most android os i have tried.

haven't gotten around to trying windows phone 7
Temple
5 / 5 (1) Jul 14, 2011
gmurphy:
Microsoft will not publicly disclose the patents in question


Citation needed. There's no 'secret' patents in question. They're all publicly filed.

Cave Man:
Well, ive had a chance to use all three and i personally like the feel of windows phone 6 over the iphone os and most android os i have tried


That's the beauty of competition. Personally, I prefer the iOS devices, but there are still things I dislike about it that Android or Windows does better. Some of those things have been folded into iOS (just as many good ideas have been taken from iOS). The great thing about competition is that with several (somewhat) divergent approaches to mobile interface, the best elements shine and get adopted more widely with the the ideas that don't work being abandoned.

With several parties trying to innovate to compete, the quality of the experience goes way up. That's a very good thing for us consumers.
J-n
not rated yet Jul 14, 2011
With several parties trying to innovate to compete, the quality of the experience goes way up. That's a very good thing for us consumers.


a VERY good thing!! That's whey these lawsuits are such a BAD thing. Microsoft and Apple and RIM have purchased a lot of patents that android was based off of, and now they are looking to charge makers of android phones, and eventually they will try to stop google from making android altogether.

This reduces competition, and stifles innovation.

Imagine if car companies were able to do the same thing with, say, a steering wheel. "I bought the patent on the steering wheel, no other company but Mine can make cars with a steering wheel"