iOS still safer than Android, according to Symantec report

Jun 29, 2011 by Katie Gatto weblog

(PhysOrg.com) -- Since the Android OS came out people have been comparing it to the iOS. One of the most important debates has been about the relative security of the two operating systems. The iOS is rather closed, with each of its apps needs to be vetted before it is released and the OS only coming from one vendor. Comparatively, the Android-based devices are a lot more open. Anyone can submit at app and have it included in the directory without vetting and many device makers use the Android OS.

Symantec has recently done a comparison of the two mobile device operating systems that showed some surprising results. As it turns out iOS currently has 182 more than the Android OS. While most of these are lower level flaws, they are still potentially harmful, since they allow full access to a devices data if they are exploited in the correct way. Yet, despite those extra flaws they still came to the conclusion that the iOS is significantly more secure than the Android OS in their overall analysis.

The two deciding factors in the analysis are the vetting process for applications, since Android has had a serious problem with trojanized applications being placed in the store in recent months, and the fact that the iOS devices all have data encryption. Android users only get a similar level of protection if they happen to be using a Honeycomb-powered tablet.

One other factor that specifically mentioned is the fact the iOS is "immune to traditional types of viruses and worms" because it can’t run desktop application code, which is how the majority of malicious code is programmed. Oddly enough, this same immunity does apply to Android-based devices of the current generation.

Explore further: Microsoft CEO is driving data-culture mindset

Related Stories

How Secure are iPhone and Android Apps

Apr 01, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Today's smartphones are pocket size computers that can be customized by downloading applications. This is what makes a smartphone vulnerable to cybercriminals. In this article we will examine ...

iOS 5 jailbroken before its release

Jun 07, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- The beta version of iOS has already been jailbroken, which is interesting when you consider that the iOS 5 was only announced 24 hours prior to the jailbreak, at the Apple keynote address ...

Android 2.3 Gingerbread expected in the next few days

Nov 09, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- While Google hasn't made any official announcements on the release date for Android 2.3 several clues online over the weekend point to an imminent release of Gingerbread. This may have to ...

Android to challenge Nokia's Symbian by 2014: Gartner

Sep 10, 2010

Google's open-source Android will become the number two mobile operating system this year, leapfrogging BlackBerry and challenging market leader Nokia's Symbian by 2014, a research firm said Friday.

Recommended for you

Microsoft CEO is driving data-culture mindset

4 hours ago

(Phys.org) —Microsoft's future strategy: is all about leveraging data, from different sources, coming together using one cohesive Microsoft architecture. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella on Tuesday, both in ...

Enabling dynamic prioritization of data in the cloud

Apr 14, 2014

IBM inventors have patented a cloud computing invention that can improve quality of service for clients by enabling data to be dynamically modified, prioritized and shared across a cloud environment.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

kaasinees
not rated yet Jun 30, 2011
I geuss they got payed by Apple.
Egnite
not rated yet Jun 30, 2011
Yeah I'd agree. The ability to jailbreak iOS I'd say the os is more open than closed.
kaasinees
5 / 5 (1) Jun 30, 2011
Yeah I'd agree. The ability to jailbreak iOS I'd say the os is more open than closed.

and it is your own responsibility what you install, just like any other os. if you jailbreak iOS you can still install some malicious software...

also there are some fallacies in the article, but i wont get into that because this article is utter shit.
gwargh
not rated yet Jun 30, 2011
Is this written by their high-school intern? Typos, odd syntax and all are expected in blogs, but I'd like to believe physorg has competent writers, or at least decent editors.

More news stories

Microsoft CEO is driving data-culture mindset

(Phys.org) —Microsoft's future strategy: is all about leveraging data, from different sources, coming together using one cohesive Microsoft architecture. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella on Tuesday, both in ...

Simplicity is key to co-operative robots

A way of making hundreds—or even thousands—of tiny robots cluster to carry out tasks without using any memory or processing power has been developed by engineers at the University of Sheffield, UK.

IBM posts lower 1Q earnings amid hardware slump

IBM's first-quarter earnings fell and revenue came in below Wall Street's expectations amid an ongoing decline in its hardware business, one that was exasperated by weaker demand in China and emerging markets.

Down's chromosome cause genome-wide disruption

The extra copy of Chromosome 21 that causes Down's syndrome throws a spanner into the workings of all the other chromosomes as well, said a study published Wednesday that surprised its authors.