Simple method of dealing with harmful radioactive iodine discovered

May 24, 2011

A novel way to immobilise radioactive forms of iodine using a microwave, has been discovered by an expert at the University of Sheffield.

Iodine are produced by of uranium fuel in a . is of concern because it is highly mobile in the environment and selective uptake by the can pose a significant following long term exposure. Furthermore, iodine-129, which is a type of radioactive iodine, has an extremely long half life of 15.7 million years, so is one of the most significant long term hazards faced by the population due to its emission during the geological disposal of nuclear waste.

Professor Neil Hyatt, from the University's Department of Materials Science and Engineering, has now found a way of locking up iodine radioisotopes in a durable, solid material suitable for ultimate disposal, like lead iodovanadinite(Pb5(VO4)3I). The research, which was published in the Journal of , demonstrates how his simple, inexpensive and rapid method can be done at .

Professor Hyatt and his team created a solid material for immobilisation of iodine with the formula Pb5(VO4)3I, by heating a mixture of lead iodide, lead oxide and vanadium oxide.

Previously, this has only been achieved using high pressure and a sealed container, because iodine is volatilised at high temperature. However, using the knowledge that vanadium is a good absorber of microwaves at 2.45 GHz – the frequency used in domestic microwave ovens – the team were able to heat the mixture of chemicals in a microwave oven to produce Pb5(VO4)3I in about three minutes.

The key to the method's success is that Pb5(VO4)3I is a poor of 2.45 GHz microwaves, so once this is formed, the sample cannot absorb microwaves, so the temperature does not get high enough for the iodine to volatilise.

Iodine-131 was the harmful gas emitted from the Fukushima power plant in Japan following the earthquake and tsunami last month, and was a significant contributor to the health effects from open-air atomic bomb testing in the 1950s, and was also emitted during the Chernobyl disaster. It is hoped the new research will reduce the public health impact associated with the release of radioactive iodine to the environment by providing a simple and inexpensive method of immobilisation in a solid material, which could be rapidly deployed in an accident scenario.

Professor Neil Hyatt, said: "In spent nuclear fuel, the iodine is not immobilised, so once the containment is breached it simply gets dispersed. At present, iodine-129 released by nuclear fuel reprocessing is discharged direct to the Irish Sea off the coast of Sellafield. Substantial quantities of this radioisotope were also released into the sea off the coast of Japan in the Fukushima incident. Our new method offers a way of safely and rapidly containing this radionuclide, reducing the potential long term impact on human health from discharge to the environment."

Explore further: Ionic liquids open door to better rare-earth materials processing

More information: Rapid synthesis of Pb5(VO4)3I, for the immobilisation of iodine radioisotopes, by microwave dielectric heating, doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.04.041

Abstract
Rapid synthesis of Pb5(VO4)3I, a potential immobilisation host for iodine radioisotopes, was achieved in an open container by microwave dielectric heating of a mixture of PbO, PbI2, and V2O5 at a power of 800 W for 180s (at 2.45 GHz). The resulting ceramic bodies exhibited a zoned microstructure, differentiated by inter-granular porosity and phase assemblage, as a consequence of the inverse temperature gradient characteristic of microwave dielectric heating. Liquid PbI2 within the interior of microwave processed ceramics assisted formation of Pb5(VO4)3I, and reduced inter-granular porosity. In contrast, the exterior of microwave processed ceramics comprised poorly sintered Pb5(VO4)3I with the presence of minor reagent relics. Quantitative microanalysis, electron diffraction and Rietveld analysis, confirmed the synthesis of stoichiometric Pb5(VO4)3I within precision. The crystal structure of Pb5(VO4)3I was found to adopt space group P63/m with a = 10.4429(3) Å and c = 7.4865(2) Å.

Provided by University of Sheffield

4 /5 (4 votes)

Related Stories

Aussies need more iodine

Aug 19, 2006

Health experts say a serious deficiency of iodine is emerging among people living in Australia's eastern states.

BUSM researchers encourage use of potassium iodide

Feb 25, 2009

Researchers from Boston University School of Medicine (BUSM) are strongly encouraging prenatal vitamin manufacturers to use only potassium iodide and not other sources of iodine in their products. According to the researchers, ...

Recommended for you

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

that_guy
5 / 5 (2) May 24, 2011
That is certainly a great way to deal with iodine when you have it in your hands, so to speak, but when you have a fukushima level disaster, I don't see how it would have helped much in the long term. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that it would only help with the immediate amount of iodine released at the beginning. If the plant is melting down, they might not have the ability or power available to corral and take care of any radioactive iodine being made.
Question
1 / 5 (1) May 24, 2011
Could building cell-phone towers around the Fukushima reactors be of any help?
Na_Reth
5 / 5 (2) May 24, 2011
What will they do? Microwave the planet?
that_guy
not rated yet May 24, 2011
What will they do? Microwave the planet?

comment of the day.
Eikka
not rated yet May 25, 2011
I think the point is that if the iodine from the spent nuclear fuel was contained in a solid in the first place, then it couldn't escape so easily in an accident.

The iodine is not leaking from the reactor, but from the spent fuel rods.
Na_Reth
not rated yet May 25, 2011
I think the point is that if the iodine from the spent nuclear fuel was contained in a solid in the first place, then it couldn't escape so easily in an accident.

The iodine is not leaking from the reactor, but from the spent fuel rods.

So basicly we spent lots of energy on making fuel rods, getting fuel, making safety measurements etc. So that we can get energy from this fuel, then to microwave its waste....

Even a combustion engine is more efficient than that..
Eikka
not rated yet May 25, 2011

Even a combustion engine is more efficient than that..


...he said without any consideration of how much energy is spent in each step.

Nuclear power still produces 60 times the energy invested in it. A combustion engine produces less than 1/4 the energy invested in it. Mainly because it's not a primary source of energy, unlike nuclear power.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.